Parametric distance weighting of landscape influence on streams

We present a parametric model for estimating the areas within watersheds whose land use best predicts indicators of stream ecological condition. We regress a stream response variable on the distance-weighted proportion of watershed area that has a specific land use, such as agriculture. Distance weighting functions model the declining influence of landscape elements as a function of their flowpath distances, first to the stream channel (to-stream distance), and then down the channel to the location at which stream condition was sampled (in-stream distance). Model parameters specify different distance scales over which to-stream and in-stream influences decline. As an example, we predict an index of biotic integrity (IBI) for the fish communities in 50 small streams of the Willamette Basin of Oregon, USA, from distance-weighted proportions of agricultural or urban land use in their watersheds. The weighting functions of best-fitting models (R 2 = 0.57) represent landscape influence on IBI as extending upstream tens of kilometers along the stream channel network, while declining nearly to zero beyond a distance of 30 m from the channel. Our example shows how parametric distance weighting can identify the distance scales, and hence the approximate areas within watersheds, for which land use is most strongly associated with a stream response variable. In addition, distance-weighting parameters offer a simple and direct language for comparing the scales of landscape influence on streams across different land uses and stream ecosystem components.

[1]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Statistical Modeling of Livestock Waste in Streams , 1996 .

[2]  David Hulse,et al.  Willamette River Basin planning atlas : trajectories of environmental and ecological change , 2002 .

[3]  Carl Richards,et al.  Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems , 1997 .

[4]  Stanley V. Gregory,et al.  Modeling inputs of large woody debris to streams from falling trees , 1990 .

[5]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SCALE OF WATERSHED INFLUENCE ON LAKES AND RIVERS , 1999 .

[6]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient interception by riparian buffers , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones , 2007 .

[8]  J. Beaman,et al.  Watershed land use is strongly linked to PCBs in white perch in Chesapeake Bay subestuaries. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Henry A. Froehlich,et al.  Designing Stable Buffer Strips for Stream Protection , 1984, Journal of Forestry.

[10]  Puneet Srivastava,et al.  Stream ecosystem responses to spatially variable land cover: an empirically based model for developing riparian restoration strategies , 2007 .

[11]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  HEURISTIC MODELS FOR MATERIAL DISCHARGE FROM LANDSCAPES WITH RIPARIAN BUFFERS , 1998 .

[12]  J. W. Kehmeier,et al.  A spatially explicit method for determining the effects of watershed scale land use on stream conditions , 2000 .

[13]  R. Hughes,et al.  Landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages , 2006 .

[14]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[15]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data , 1997 .

[16]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[17]  J. Baker,et al.  ALTERNATIVE-FUTURES ANALYSIS FOR THE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON 1 , 2004 .

[18]  R. Sponseller,et al.  Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities , 2001 .

[19]  Richard C. Lathrop,et al.  Phosphorus Loads to Surface Waters: A Simple Model to Account for Spatial Pattern of Land Use , 1996 .

[20]  John Van Sickle,et al.  ANALYZING CORRELATIONS BETWEEN STREAM AND WATERSHED ATTRIBUTES 1 , 2003 .

[21]  G. Helfman,et al.  Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Michael T. Barbour,et al.  Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers , 1989 .

[23]  Alexander H. Elliott,et al.  Estimating the sources and transport of nutrients in the Waikato River Basin, New Zealand , 2002 .

[24]  J. Hoef,et al.  Spatial statistical models that use flow and stream distance , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[25]  P. J. Wigington,et al.  Stream network expansion: a riparian water quality factor , 2005 .

[26]  Michael J. Wiley,et al.  Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed , 1988 .

[27]  P. J. Wigington,et al.  Development of Landscape Metrics for Characterizing Riparian-Stream Networks , 1999 .

[28]  J. Sickle.  ERRATA.: "Analyzing Correlations Between Stream and Watershed Attributes" , 2005 .

[29]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[31]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[32]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[33]  R. Hughes,et al.  A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity , 1998 .

[34]  John F. Paul,et al.  Relationships between watershed Stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Carolyn T. Hunsaker,et al.  Hierarchical Approaches to the Study of Water Quality in RiversSpatial scale and terrestrial processes are important in developing models to translate research results to management practices , 1995 .

[36]  John Van Sickle,et al.  PROJECTING THE BIOLOGICAL CONDITION OF STREAMS UNDER ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS OF HUMAN LAND USE , 2004 .

[37]  W. Cohen,et al.  Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data , 2001 .

[38]  J. Lyons,et al.  Impacts of Urbanization on Stream Habitat and Fish Across Multiple Spatial Scales , 2001, Environmental management.

[39]  A. Covich,et al.  Scales of observation of riparian forests and distributions of suspended detritus in a prairie river , 1997 .

[40]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  RAPID COMMUNICATION / COMMUNICATION RAPIDE Determination of optimal riparian forest buffer dimensions for stream biota-landscape association models using multimetric and multivariate responses , 2005 .

[41]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Effects of Land Cover on Stream Ecosystems: Roles of Empirical Models and Scaling Issues , 2003 .

[42]  Judy A. Horwatich,et al.  INFLUENCES OF WATERSHED, RIPARIAN‐CORRIDOR, AND REACH‐SCALE CHARACTERISTICS ON AQUATIC BIOTA IN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS 1 , 2001 .

[43]  J. David Allan,et al.  Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Effects of stream map resolution on measures of riparian buffer distribution and nutrient retention potential , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  J. Kirchner.  Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology , 2006 .

[46]  Denis White,et al.  ALTERNATIVE FUTURES FOR THE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON , 2004 .

[47]  J. Allan.  Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[48]  George P. Malanson,et al.  Riparian landscapes: Frontmatter , 1993 .

[49]  D. Parkinson,et al.  Bayesian Methods in Cosmology: Model selection and multi-model inference , 2009 .

[50]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Comparison of automated watershed delineations: effects on land cover areas, percentages, and relationships to nutrient discharge , 2006 .