Best ManageMent Practices for Pathogen control in Manure ManageMent systeMs

Livestock waste contains many microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. Some of these microorganisms do not cause sickness in animals or humans. However, some others are pathogens, meaning they are capable of causing disease in animals and/or humans. Irrespective of the size of their farms, all livestock producers have an important role in limiting pathogen movement from their operation to the environment. The purpose of this bulletin is to provide livestock producers with tools to help control pathogens in their production system. The best management practices (BMPs) addressed in this paper will focus on animal management and housing, dietary modifications, production management, land application of manure, and the chemical and biological treatment of stored manure. The number and types of pathogens present in livestock waste varies with animal species, feedstuff sources, health status of the animals, and characteristics of the manure and manure storage facilities. Not all pathogens are the same. Some are able to survive for long periods of time in manure. Others are susceptible to temperature extremes and manure processing. Therefore, adequate control of pathogens may require multiple management interventions to achieve significant reduction of pathogens in a manure management system.

[1]  P. Levett,et al.  The effect of slurry storage and anaerobic digestion on survival of pathogenic bacteria. , 1993, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[2]  W. Sandine,et al.  Effect of Feeding Lactobacilli on the Coliform and Lactobacillus Flora of Intestinal Tissue and Feces from Piglets 1. , 1977, Journal of food protection.

[3]  T. Besser,et al.  Multiple sources of Escherichia coli O157 in feedlots and dairy farms in the northwestern USA. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  R. Holley,et al.  The effect of different grain diets on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by steers. , 2000, Journal of food protection.

[5]  Cathy A. Brown,et al.  Reduction of Carriage of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Cattle by Inoculation with Probiotic Bacteria , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  A. Wingstrand,et al.  The effect of feeding pellets, meal and heat treatment on the Salmonella-prevalence of finishing pigs , 1999 .

[7]  R. H. Bailey,et al.  Effect of lactic acid administration in the drinking water during preslaughter feed withdrawal on Salmonella and Campylobacter contamination of broilers. , 2001, Poultry science.

[8]  M. Hutchison,et al.  Effect of Length of Time before Incorporation on Survival of Pathogenic Bacteria Present in Livestock Wastes Applied to Agricultural Soil , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  K. Shea Antibiotic resistance: what is the impact of agricultural uses of antibiotics on children's health? , 2003, Pediatrics.

[10]  T. Marubashi,et al.  Significance of fecal volatile fatty acids in shedding of Escherichia coli O157 from calves: experimental infection and preliminary use of a probiotic product. , 2000, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[11]  A. Metzler,et al.  In situ inactivation of animal viruses and a coliphage in nonaerated liquid and semiliquid animal wastes , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  B. B. Jensen,et al.  Effects of Nondigestible Oligosaccharides onSalmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and NonpathogenicEscherichia coli in the Pig Small Intestine In Vitro , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  S. Bicknell Salmonella aberdeen infection in cattle associated with human sewage , 1972, Journal of Hygiene.

[14]  L. Williams,et al.  Reduction of fecal shedding of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in lambs by feeding microbial feed supplement. , 2001, Small ruminant research : the journal of the International Goat Association.