Modelling ordinal relations with SVMs: An application to objective aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment

The cosmetic result is an important endpoint for breast cancer conservative treatment (BCCT), but the verification of this outcome remains without a standard. Objective assessment methods are preferred to overcome the drawbacks of subjective evaluation. In this paper a novel algorithm is proposed, based on support vector machines, for the classification of ordinal categorical data. This classifier is then applied as a new methodology for the objective assessment of the aesthetic result of BCCT. Based on the new classifier, a semi-objective score for quantification of the aesthetic results of BCCT was developed, allowing the discrimination of patients into four classes.

[1]  Jian-xiong Dong,et al.  Fast SVM training algorithm with decomposition on very large data sets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Klaus Obermayer,et al.  Regression Models for Ordinal Data: A Machine Learning Approach , 1999 .

[3]  S. Sarna,et al.  [Regression models]. , 1988, Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja.

[4]  Klaus Obermayer,et al.  Support vector learning for ordinal regression , 1999 .

[6]  S Hellman,et al.  Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Amnon Shashua,et al.  Ranking with Large Margin Principle: Two Approaches , 2002, NIPS.

[8]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Shigeo Abe DrEng.  Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[10]  M. Noguchi,et al.  Breast deformity, its correction, and assessment of breast conserving surgery , 1991, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[11]  Maria João Cardoso,et al.  Interobserver agreement and consensus over the esthetic evaluation of conservative treatment for breast cancer. , 2006, Breast.

[12]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system. , 1989, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Incremental training of support vector machines , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[14]  Václav Hlavác,et al.  Multi-class support vector machine , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[15]  Vasant Dhar.  Book Review: "Neural Networks in Financial Engineering: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Neural Networks in the Capital Markets (NNCM-95)", by A.-P. N. Refenes, Y. Abu-Mostafa, J. Moody, A. Weigend , 1997, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[16]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Classification by Pairwise Coupling , 1997, NIPS.

[17]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[18]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  Choosing observers for evaluation of aesthetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[20]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[21]  John C. Platt,et al.  Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization, advances in kernel methods , 1999 .

[22]  J. F. Pinto Da Costa,et al.  SVMs applied to objective aesthetic evaluation conservative breast cancer treatment , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[23]  J R Yarnold,et al.  Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  R W Blamey,et al.  The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. , 1999, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[25]  J. Borger,et al.  Conservative breast cancer treatment: analysis of cosmetic results and the role of concomitant adjuvant chemotherapy. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support vector learning , 1997 .

[27]  J O Archambeau,et al.  Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  J. Mazeron,et al.  Conservative treatment for breast cancer: long-term results (15 years). , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  Yi Lin,et al.  Support Vector Machines for Classification in Nonstandard Situations , 2002, Machine Learning.

[30]  Jason Weston,et al.  Multi-Class Support Vector Machines , 1998 .

[31]  D. Signorini,et al.  Neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[32]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[33]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[34]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[35]  H. Bingham.  Cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer , 1985 .

[36]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[37]  A. Luini,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative cosmetic evaluation after conservative treatment for breast cancer. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[38]  Tomas Kron,et al.  A comparison of methods of cosmetic assessment in breast conservation treatment , 1996 .