Minimal basilar membrane motion in low-frequency hearing

Significance To perceive speech, the brain relies on inputs from sensory cells located near the top of the spiral-shaped cochlea. This low-frequency region of the inner ear is anatomically difficult to access, and it has not previously been possible to study its mechanical response to sound in intact preparations. Here, we used optical coherence tomography to image sound-evoked vibration inside the intact cochlea. We show that low-frequency sound moves a small portion of the basilar membrane, and that the motion declines in an exponential manner across the basilar membrane. Hence, the response of the hearing organ to speech-frequency sounds is different from the one evident in high-frequency cochlear regions. Low-frequency hearing is critically important for speech and music perception, but no mechanical measurements have previously been available from inner ears with intact low-frequency parts. These regions of the cochlea may function in ways different from the extensively studied high-frequency regions, where the sensory outer hair cells produce force that greatly increases the sound-evoked vibrations of the basilar membrane. We used laser interferometry in vitro and optical coherence tomography in vivo to study the low-frequency part of the guinea pig cochlea, and found that sound stimulation caused motion of a minimal portion of the basilar membrane. Outside the region of peak movement, an exponential decline in motion amplitude occurred across the basilar membrane. The moving region had different dependence on stimulus frequency than the vibrations measured near the mechanosensitive stereocilia. This behavior differs substantially from the behavior found in the extensively studied high-frequency regions of the cochlea.

[1]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Minimally invasive surgical method to detect sound processing in the cochlear apex by optical coherence tomography , 2016, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  Audrey K. Ellerbee,et al.  Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Effects of salicylate on sound-evoked outer hair cell stereocilia deflections , 2015, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

[4]  T. Ren,et al.  Light-induced vibration in the hearing organ , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Ruikang K. Wang,et al.  Filtering of Acoustic Signals within the Hearing Organ , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Tobias Reichenbach,et al.  The Spatial Pattern of Cochlear Amplification , 2012, Neuron.

[7]  W. Brownell,et al.  Sound-induced length changes in outer hair cell stereocilia , 2012, Nature Communications.

[8]  Sripriya Ramamoorthy,et al.  Persistence of past stimulations: storing sounds within the inner ear. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[9]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Dual contribution to amplification in the mammalian inner ear. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[10]  Tobias Reichenbach,et al.  A ratchet mechanism for amplification in low-frequency mammalian hearing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Ulfendahl,et al.  A digital heterodyne laser interferometer for studying cochlear mechanics , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  J. Ashmore Cochlear outer hair cell motility. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[13]  Ombeline de La Rochefoucauld,et al.  The role of organ of Corti mass in passive cochlear tuning. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[14]  N. Cooper,et al.  An experimental study into the acousto-mechanical effects of invading the cochlea , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  Mats Ulfendahl,et al.  Imaging hair cell transduction at the speed of sound: dynamic behavior of mammalian stereocilia. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  R. Fettiplace,et al.  Force generation by mammalian hair bundles supports a role in cochlear amplification , 2005, Nature.

[17]  Mathematical modeling of the radial profile of basilar membrane vibrations in the inner ear. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Philip X Joris,et al.  Cochlear Phase and Amplitude Retrieved from the Auditory Nerve at Arbitrary Frequencies , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Ren Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  H. Kennedy,et al.  FM1-43 Dye Behaves as a Permeant Blocker of the Hair-Cell Mechanotransducer Channel , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[23]  S. Khanna,et al.  Amplification in the apical turn of the cochlea with negative feedback , 2000, Hearing Research.

[24]  S. Khanna,et al.  Vibrations of the guinea pig organ of Corti in the apical turn , 2000, Hearing Research.

[25]  Jing Zheng,et al.  Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells , 2000, Nature.

[26]  W Hemmert,et al.  Three-dimensional motion of the organ of Corti. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Werner Hemmert,et al.  Characteristics of the travelling wave in the low-frequency region of a temporal-bone preparation of the guinea-pig cochlea , 2000, Hearing Research.

[28]  Anthony W. Gummer,et al.  Evidence for active, nonlinear, negative feedback in the vibration response of the apical region of the in-vivo guinea-pig cochlea , 2000, Hearing Research.

[29]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S. Khanna,et al.  Mechanical response characteristics of the hearing organ in the low-frequency regions of the cochlea. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  W Hemmert,et al.  Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Steady-state sinusoidal velocity responses of the basilar membrane in guinea pig. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  William S. Rhode,et al.  Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[35]  J. Conlee,et al.  Turn-specific differences in the endocochlear potential between albino and pigmented guinea pigs , 1993, Hearing Research.

[36]  W. Brownell,et al.  Effects of salicylate on shape, electromotility and membrane characteristics of isolated outer hair cells from guinea pig cochlea. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[37]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing , 1990 .

[38]  J. Kelly Cellular organization of the guinea pig's cochlea. , 1989, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[39]  Comparison of the tuning of outer hair cells and the basilar membrane in the isolated cochlea. , 1989, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[40]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[41]  P. Coleman,et al.  Experiments in hearing , 1961 .