Low energy values of fish as a probable cause of a major seabird breeding failure in the North Sea

Many seabirds in the North Sea feed on lesser sandeels Ammodytes marinus during the breed- ing season. Unprecedented breeding failures were recorded at many seabird colonies on the east coast of Britain in 2004. We used demographic, dietary and behavioural data from a long-term study of a colony of common guillemots Uria aalge, the most abundant seabird species in the North Sea, to set the 2004 season in context. Birds at this colony showed greatly reduced breeding success and those chicks that did survive left the colony in very poor condition. The main prey item fed to chicks in 2004 was sprat Sprattus sprattus rather than sandeels, and parents increased the amount of time spent foraging, frequently leaving chicks unat- tended in order to maintain a normal feeding rate. The calculated daily food intake of chicks derived from these values did not differ markedly from previous years and therefore the magnitude of the impact on chick growth and breeding success appeared dispro- portionately large. However, nutrient analyses of fish collected from birds in 2004 revealed them to be of sig- nificantly lower energy value than expected. Poor food quality therefore appeared to be the proximate cause of seabird breeding failure in 2004 giving support to the 'junk-food' hypothesis. Single-prey loaders such as guillemots will be particularly sensitive to reductions in the energy value of food items. The reasons for the poor fish condition in this part of the North Sea are currently unknown, but the results provide further evidence of major changes in the North Sea food web.

[1]  D. Elston,et al.  Evidence for decrease in size of lesser sandeels Ammodytes marinus in a North Sea aggregation over a 30-yr period , 2004 .

[2]  M. Edwards,et al.  Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch , 2004, Nature.

[3]  Grégory Beaugrand,et al.  The North Sea regime shift: Evidence, causes, mechanisms and consequences , 2004 .

[4]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Seabird populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998-2002) , 2004 .

[5]  P. C. Reid,et al.  Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea , 2003, Nature.

[6]  W. Montevecchi,et al.  Signals from seabirds indicate changing biology of capelin stocks , 2003 .

[7]  J. Piatt,et al.  Variance in prey abundance influences time budgets of breeding seabirds: evidence from pigeon guillemots Cepphus columba , 2003 .

[8]  J. Piatt,et al.  Response of pigeon guillemots to variable abundance of high-lipid and low-lipid prey , 2002, Oecologia.

[9]  P. C. Reid,et al.  Reorganization of North Atlantic Marine Copepod Biodiversity and Climate , 2002, Science.

[10]  O. Olsson,et al.  A decrease in fledging body mass in common guillemot Uria aalge chicks in the Baltic Sea , 2001 .

[11]  T. Kunz,et al.  Body Composition Analysis of Animals: Standard methods for destructive body composition analysis , 2001 .

[12]  William J. Sydeman,et al.  Climate change, reproductive performance and diet composition of marine birds in the southern California Current system, 1969-1997 , 2001 .

[13]  R. Furness,et al.  Seabird-fishery interactions : quantifying the sensitivity of seabirds to reductions in sandeel abundance, and identification of key areas for sensitive seabirds in the North Sea , 2000 .

[14]  S. Wanless,et al.  Foraging ranges, diets and feeding locations of gannets Morus bassanus in the North Sea:evidence from satellite telemetry , 2000 .

[15]  David A. S. Rosen,et al.  Pollock and the decline of Steller sea lions: testing the junk-food hypothesis. , 2000 .

[16]  Aj. Upton,et al.  Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 1999 , 2000 .

[17]  Anthony,et al.  Lipid content and energy density of forage fishes from the northern Gulf of Alaska. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[18]  J. Wingfield,et al.  The adrenocortical stress-response of Black-legged Kittiwake chicks in relation to dietary restrictions , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[19]  J. Piatt,et al.  Proximate Composition and Energy Density of Some North Pacific Forage Fishes , 1997 .

[20]  R. Merrick,et al.  Diet diversity of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) and their population decline in Alaska: a potential relationship , 1997 .

[21]  M. Heubeck,et al.  Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 1995 , 1996 .

[22]  P. J. Anderson,et al.  Response of common murres to the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill and long-term changes in the Gulf of Alaska marine ecosystem , 1996 .

[23]  M. Harris,et al.  Variation in the calorific value and total energy content of the lesser sandeel (Ammodytes marinus) and other fish preyed on by seabirds , 1991 .

[24]  J. Piatt,et al.  Flexible time budgets in breeding Common Murres: Buffers against variable prey availability , 1990 .

[25]  W. Montevecchi,et al.  Dehydration of seabird prey during transport to the colony: effects on wet weight energy densities , 1987 .

[26]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Ecological relationships between Common Murres, Uria aalge, and Thick-billed Murres, Uria lomvia, at the Gannet Islands, Labrador. III. Feeding ecology of the young , 1987 .

[27]  S. Wanless,et al.  Two cases of guillemots, Uria aalge helping to rear neighbours' chicks on the Isle of May , 1985 .

[28]  D. Crisp.  Energy flow measurements. , 1984 .

[29]  S. Hedgren,et al.  Growth of Guillemot Uria aalge chicks in relation to time of hatching , 1979 .

[30]  T. Birkhead.  Behavioural adaptations to high density nesting in the common guillemot Uria aalge , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  T. Pearson.  The feeding biology of seabird species breeding on the Farne Islands, Northumberland. , 1968 .