Massive immigration balances high anthropogenic mortality in a stable eagle owl population: Lessons for conservation

Abstract The modern anthropized landscape is a major source of hazards for large animals such as raptors. Collisions with cables, vehicles and trains, as well as electrocution cause casualties, which may negatively impact populations. Yet, demographic studies of that impact remain scarce, which is an impediment to evidence-based conservation action. We studied the dynamics of an eagle owl ( Bubo bubo ) population in the northwestern Alps (Switzerland). We estimated, firstly, its demographic parameters using a Bayesian integrated population model; secondly, the frequency of different types of casualty through radio-tracking. Thirdly, we investigated the effects of reductions of human-related mortality on population trends. The breeding population was small but remained fairly stable during 20 years, suggesting that it was apparently in a good shape. However, survival probabilities of all age classes were very low (⩽0.61), productivity fairly good (0.93), and immigration very high (1.6 females per pair and year), indicating that the population operated as a sink. Half of the mortality was caused by infrastructure, with electrocution accounting for 24% of all fatalities. The elimination of electrocution would result in a strong population increase (17% annually). Under that scenario, immigration rate could decline by 60% and the population would still remain stable. Given that the supply of recruits from elsewhere is likely to continue, we can expect a rapid local population recovery if dangerous electric pylons are mitigated systematically. Our study demonstrates that detailed demographic analyses are necessary to diagnose problems occurring in populations and to identify efficient conservation actions.

[1]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Consequences of large‐scale processes for the conservation of bird populations , 2000 .

[2]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[3]  M. Conroy,et al.  Modeling demographic processes in marked populations , 2009 .

[4]  James E. Hines,et al.  Population dynamics of the California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis): a meta-analysis , 2004 .

[5]  Kai Curry-Lindahi,et al.  Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas , 1970 .

[6]  P. Pedrini,et al.  Costs and benefits of breeding in human‐altered landscapes for the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo , 2002 .

[7]  P Besbeas,et al.  Integrating Mark–Recapture–Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters , 2002, Biometrics.

[8]  Jean-Dominique Lebreton,et al.  DYNAMICAL AND STATISTICAL MODELS FOR EXPLOITED POPULATIONS † , 2005 .

[9]  R. Ricklefs COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF NEW WORLD POPULATIONS OF THRUSHES (TURDUS SPP.) , 1997 .

[10]  S. Brooks,et al.  A Bayesian approach to combining animal abundance and demographic data , 2004 .

[11]  M. Schaub,et al.  Local population dynamics and the impact of scale and isolation: a study on different little owl populations , 2006 .

[12]  B. Ballachey,et al.  Estimating survival rates with age-structure data , 1998 .

[13]  Roger Pradel,et al.  ASSESSING THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF MORTALITY FROM RECOVERIES OF MARKED ANIMALS , 2004 .

[14]  O. Gimenez,et al.  Use of Integrated Modeling to Enhance Estimates of Population Dynamics Obtained from Limited Data , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[16]  R. Arlettaz,et al.  Wide-range dispersal in juvenile Eagle Owls (Bubo bubo) across the European Alps calls for transnational conservation programmes , 2009, Journal of Ornithology.

[17]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[18]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  An assessment of integrated population models: bias, accuracy, and violation of the assumption of independence. , 2010, Ecology.

[19]  M. T. Murphy Habitat-specific demography of a long-distance, neotropical migrant bird, the eastern kingbird , 2001 .

[20]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[21]  V. Penteriani,et al.  Electrocution alters the distribution and density of a top predator, the eagle owl Bubo bubo , 2004 .

[22]  J. Nichols,et al.  Comparative demography of new world populations of thrushes (Turdus spp.): Comment , 2005 .

[23]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Tests of Compensatory vs. Additive Hypotheses of Mortality in Mallards , 1984 .

[24]  J. Lebreton,et al.  Testing the additive versus the compensatory hypothesis of mortality from ring recovery data using a random effects model , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[25]  P H Harvey,et al.  THE NATAL AND BREEDING DISPERSAL OF BIRDS , 1982 .

[26]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .

[27]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Estimation of immigration rate using integrated population models , 2010 .

[28]  J. Ortego Consequences of Eagle Owl nest-site habitat preference for breeding performance and territory stability , 2007 .

[29]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  State-space modelling of data on marked individuals , 2007 .

[30]  William A. Link,et al.  Bayesian Inference: With Ecological Applications , 2009 .