Beyond technical smartness: Rethinking the development and implementation of sociotechnical smart grids in India

Abstract How smart grids are understood and defined will influence the kinds of smart grids users will encounter in the future and their potential impacts. Practitioners and policymakers largely perceive smart grids as technological interventions. However, a number of social, financial and governmental interventions can also make grids smart, i.e., more efficient, more responsive, more inclusive and more robust. Drawing on qualitative research done using elite interviews, site visits and document analysis of eight micro-grids in India, this paper provides concrete examples of what could be understood as social, financial and governmental smartness, and in doing so, broadens the knowledge on smart grids beyond the technical understanding. This paper argues that social, financial and governmental interventions are central to ‘smartness’, and that multifaceted and relational sociotechnical approaches will build cheaper, just, more democratic and sustainable smart grids. The paper observes that smart grids are not conceived as smart grids but rather develop incrementally. An incremental approach, rather than pushing a premeditated set of ideas and technologies, reduces adoption of non-contextual interventions as well as unnecessary investments in new technologies. The paper recommends that policymakers and practitioners should understand and develop smart grids as sociotechnical and incremental grids.

[1]  J. Beaulieu.  What Are Smart Grids? Epistemology, Interdisciplinarity and Getting Things Done , 2016 .

[2]  Johannes Kester,et al.  Conducting a Smarter Grid: Reflecting on the Power and Security Behind Smart Grids with Foucault , 2016 .

[3]  William Throndsen,et al.  What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid , 2017 .

[4]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Constructing users in the smart grid—insights from the Danish eFlex project , 2013 .

[5]  S. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Viability of Off-Grid Electricity Supply Using Rice Husk: A Case Study from South Asia , 2014 .

[6]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  J. Nuckolls.  THE CASE FOR SOUND SYMBOLISM , 1999 .

[8]  P. Bardouille.  From gap to opportunity : business models for scaling up energy access , 2012 .

[9]  F. Geels,et al.  Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways , 2010 .

[10]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  New thinking on the agentive relationship between end-use technologies and energy-using practices , 2008 .

[11]  U. Hansen,et al.  The uptake and diffusion of solar power in Africa: Socio-cultural and political insights on a rapidly emerging socio-technical transition , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[12]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  Enabling Mini-grid Development in Rural India , 2017 .

[13]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure , 2013 .

[14]  B. V. Vliet,et al.  Households as change agents in a Dutch smart energy transition: On power, privacy and participation , 2015 .

[15]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  Smart grid initiative for power distribution utility in India , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[16]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Metering: EU policy and implications for fuel poor households , 2012 .

[17]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: New empirical and conceptual insights , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[18]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change , 2014 .

[19]  Gopal K. Sarangi.  Renewable energy-based rural electrification : The mini-grid experience from India , 2014 .

[20]  Colin McFarlane,et al.  The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space , 2011 .

[21]  Debajit Palit,et al.  The Solar Transitions research on solar mini-grids in India: Learning from local cases of innovative socio-technical systems , 2011 .

[23]  G. Rose.  Posthuman Agency in the Digitally Mediated City: Exteriorization, Individuation, Reinvention , 2017 .

[24]  Marc Busch,et al.  Consumers’ privacy concerns and implications for a privacy preserving Smart Grid architecture—Results of an Austrian study , 2015 .

[25]  D. Ockwell,et al.  Financing sustainable energy for all: pay-as-you-go vs. traditional solar finance approaches in Kenya , 2014 .

[26]  G. Walker,et al.  Carbon reduction, 'the public' and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. , 2007 .

[27]  A. Lösch,et al.  How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices , 2017 .

[28]  H. W. V. Dijk,et al.  Towards an ethnography of electrification in rural India: Social relations and values in household energy exchanges , 2017 .

[29]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Getting Smart? Climate Change and the Electric Grid , 2013 .

[30]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  "What's the meaning of 'smart'? A study of smart grids":Sociotechnical Report , 2015 .

[31]  Sam Wong,et al.  Overcoming obstacles against effective solar lighting interventions in South Asia , 2012 .

[32]  S. K. Sarma,et al.  The Best Model for Micro-lending: Self-help Group or Joint Liability Group? , 2014 .

[33]  Kush R. Varshney,et al.  Predictive Modeling of Customer Repayment for Sustainable Pay-As-You-Go Solar Power in Rural India , 2015 .

[34]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1934, Microbial pathogenesis.

[35]  Ratri Sryantoro Wakeling,et al.  Attracting private investments into rural electrification — A case study on renewable energy based village grids in Indonesia , 2013 .

[36]  Lea Schick,et al.  Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—A study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy , 2015 .

[37]  Krishan K. Pandey,et al.  Of pilferers and poachers: Combating electricity theft in India , 2016 .

[38]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Smart and Just Grids for sub-Saharan Africa : Exploring options , 2013 .

[39]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Material participation and the smart grid: Exploring different modes of articulation , 2015 .

[40]  T. Pallesen,et al.  Organizing consumers for a decarbonized electricity system: Calculative agencies and user scripts in a Danish demonstration project , 2018 .

[41]  B. Sovacool.  The political economy of energy poverty: A review of key challenges , 2012 .

[42]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[43]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Grid and off-grid electrification: An integrated model with applications to India , 2014 .

[44]  Zbigniew A. Styczynski,et al.  Smart Grids – Fundamentals and Technologies in Electricity Networks , 2014 .

[45]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[46]  Marc Poumadère,et al.  When meters start to talk: The public’s encounter with smart meters in France , 2015 .

[47]  Kirsten E H Jenkins,et al.  Energy justice : a conceptual review , 2016 .

[48]  A. Vasudevan.  The makeshift city , 2015 .

[49]  Ankit Kumar,et al.  Energy Access in an Era of Low Carbon Transitions: Politicising Energy for Development Projects in India , 2015 .

[50]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Smart grids and the constitution of solar electricity conduct , 2016 .

[51]  Matthias Wissner,et al.  The Smart Grid – A saucerful of secrets? , 2011 .

[52]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Mini-grid based off-grid electrification to enhance electricity access in developing countries: What policies may be required? , 2016 .

[53]  Jon Silver.  Incremental infrastructures: material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra , 2014 .

[54]  Ash Amin,et al.  Lively Infrastructure , 2014 .

[55]  Ankit Kumar.  Justice and politics in energy access for education, livelihoods and health: How socio-cultural processes mediate the winners and losers , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.