The Internet and Campaign Finance in the U.S. and the UK: An Institutional Comparison

ABSTRACT While much literature on the Internet has drawn heavily on the ideas of normalization or optimism, this article seeks to define a more complex relationship between existing political institutions and new technology. With reference to the development of campaign finance strategies in the U.S. and the UK, it will aim to show that existing political circumstances and technology share a dialectic relationship when it comes to generating outcomes. The success of online fundraising in the U.S. is certainly reforming political life, but it is the product of longstanding arrangements and beliefs that have catalyzed its impact. In contrast in the United Kingdom, institutional arrangements have retarded the potential of the Web in this area.

[1]  R. Klotz.  The politics of Internet communication , 2003 .

[2]  B. Towers.  Running the Gauntlet: British Trade Unions under Thatcher, 1979–1988 , 1989 .

[3]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Soft Money, Hard Money, Strong Parties , 2000 .

[4]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Parties, Election Campaigning and the Internet:Toward A Comparative Institutional Approach , 2008 .

[5]  J. Bryce,et al.  The American Commonwealth , 1973 .

[6]  P. Filene.  An Obituary for "The Progressive Movement" , 1970 .

[7]  D. Resnick,et al.  Politics on the Internet: The Normalization of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[8]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Active participation or just more information? , 2005 .

[9]  Richard S. Katz,et al.  Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy , 1995 .

[10]  D. Kavanagh.  Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics , 1995 .

[11]  M. Pinto-Duschinsky.  British Political Finance 1830-1980 , 1981 .

[12]  Paul Webb.  The Modern British Party System , 2000 .

[13]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study , 1964 .

[14]  Rachel K. Gibson,et al.  Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects 1 , 2005 .

[15]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , 1964 .

[16]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Parties Without Partisans , 2002 .

[17]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[18]  J. Fisher.  Party Finance: Is More Reform Still Needed? , 2002 .

[19]  J. Fisher,et al.  Comparative Party Finance Reform , 2004 .

[20]  R. Johnston,et al.  Funding Local Political Parties in England and Wales: Donations and Constituency Campaigns , 2007 .

[21]  Douglas Rushkoff,et al.  Open Source Democracy: How Online Communication is Changing Offline Politics , 2003 .

[22]  D. Adamany.  The New Faces of American Politics , 1986 .

[23]  M. Duverger.  Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State , 1964 .

[24]  J. Curtis,et al.  Voluntary Association Membership in Fifteen Countries : a Comparative Analysis , 1992 .

[25]  M. Linton.  Money and votes , 1994 .

[26]  Alan Brinkley,et al.  Richard Hofstadter's the Age of Reform: A Reconsideration@@@The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. , 1985 .

[27]  J. Fisher.  The political parties, elections and referendums act 2000 , 2001 .

[28]  Asghar Zardkoohi.  On the Political Participation of the Firm in the Electoral Process , 1985 .

[29]  Michael J. Malbin.  A Public Funding System in Jeopardy: Lessons from the Presidential Nomination Contest of 2004 , 2006 .

[30]  R. Heffernan.  Political Parties and the Party System , 2003 .

[31]  R. Boatright.  Situating the New 527 Organizations in Interest Group Theory , 2007 .

[32]  Donald J. Pierce,et al.  Democracy in America , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[33]  S. Scarrow.  Explaining Political Finance Reforms , 2004 .

[34]  J. Trippi.  The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the Overthrow of Everything , 2005 .