Changes of effective connectivity between the lateral and medial parts of the prefrontal cortex during a visual task

Structural equation modelling was used to study the change of connectivity during a visual task with continuous variation of the attention load. The model was based on areas defined by the haemodynamic responses described elsewhere [Mazoyer, P., Wicker, B. & Fonlupt, P. (2002) A neural network elicited by parametric manipulation of the attention load. Neuroreport, 13, 2331–2334], including occipitotemporal, parietal, temporal and prefrontal (lateral and medial areas) cortices. We have studied stationary‐ (which does not depend on the attentional load) and attention‐related coupling between areas. This allowed the segregation of two subsystems. The first could reflect a system performing the integration step of the visual signal and the second a system participating in response selection. The major finding is the mutual negative influence between the lateral and medial parts of the prefrontal cortex. This negative influence between these two brain regions increased with the attention load. This is interpreted as a modification of the balance between integration and decision processes that are needed for the task to be efficiently completed.

[1]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[2]  L. Parsons,et al.  Interregional connectivity to primary motor cortex revealed using MRI resting state images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Attention to Action: Specific Modulation of Corticocortical Interactions in Humans , 2001, NeuroImage.

[4]  T. Hanakawa,et al.  Transient Neural Activity in the Medial Superior Frontal Gyrus and Precuneus Time Locked with Attention Shift between Object Features , 1999, NeuroImage.

[5]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Nobre,et al.  The Large-Scale Neural Network for Spatial Attention Displays Multifunctional Overlap But Differential Asymmetry , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[11]  G. Shulman,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Turken,et al.  Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Two Modulatory Effects of Attention That Mediate Object Categorization in Human Cortex , 1997, Science.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing interactions among neuronal systems using functional neuroimaging , 2000, Neural Networks.

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Noradrenergically Mediated Plasticity in a Human Attentional Neuronal Network , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  R. Passingham,et al.  Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  J. Bullier.  Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[22]  E. Tulving,et al.  Network Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Data: Ensemble Inhibition during Episodic Memory Retrieval , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Learning-related neuronal responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  P. Fonlupt,et al.  A neural network elicited by parametric manipulation of the attention load , 2002, Neuroreport.

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.