Standardized guidelines for the interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography reduce interinstitutional variance in interpretation.

[1]  M. Takeuchi,et al.  Reproducibility of dobutamine digital stress echocardiography. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  L Weinert,et al.  Segmental analysis of color kinesis images: new method for quantification of the magnitude and timing of endocardial motion during left ventricular systole and diastole. , 1997, Circulation.

[3]  J Gorcsan,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the segmental left ventricular response to dobutamine stress by tissue Doppler echocardiography. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  L Hatle,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation for analysis of left ventricular wall motion at baseline and during low- and high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with high prevalence of wall motion abnormalities at rest. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  R Erbel,et al.  Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  H. Kelbæk,et al.  Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in asymptomatic healthy individuals. The relativity of stress-induced hyperkinesia. , 1995, Circulation.

[7]  H. Egeblad,et al.  Reproducibility of digital exercise echocardiography. , 1995, European heart journal.

[8]  A. Djordjević-Dikić,et al.  Stress Echocardiography in the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia: Head‐to‐Head Comparison of Exercise, Dobutamine, and Dipyridamole Tests , 1994, Circulation.

[9]  T. Porter,et al.  Improved Endocardial Border Resolution During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography with Intravenous Sonicated Dextrose Albumin , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Factors affecting uniformity in interpretation of planar thallium-201 imaging in a multicenter trial. The Multicenter Study on Silent Myocardial Ischemia (MSSMI) Thallium-201 Investigators. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  T. Marwick,et al.  Selection of the Optimal Nonexercise Stress for the Evaluation of Ischemic Regional Myocardial Dysfunction and Malperfusion Comparison of Dobutamine and Adenosine Using Echocardiography and 99mTc‐MIBI Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 1993, Circulation.

[12]  W. Armstrong,et al.  Accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  E. Picano,et al.  Stress echocardiography and the human factor: the importance of being expert. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  N. Nanda,et al.  Reproducibility of two-dimensional exercise echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[16]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Agreement in Human Interpretation of Analog Thallium Myocardial Perfusion Images , 1981, Circulation.

[17]  J. Murray,et al.  Variability in the Analysis of Coronary Arteriograms , 1977, Circulation.

[18]  R. Dinsmore,et al.  Interobserver Variability in Coronary Angiography , 1976, Circulation.

[19]  L. T. Sheffield,et al.  The exercise electrocardiogram: differences in interpretation. Report of a technical group on exercise electrocardiography. , 1968, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  H BLACKBURN,et al.  THE EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; EXPERIENCE IN ANALYSIS OF "NOISY" CARDIOGRAMS WITH A SMALL COMPUTER. , 1965, American heart journal.

[21]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[22]  H N SEGALL,et al.  The electrocardiogram and its interpretation: a study of reports by 20 physicians on a set of 100 electrocardiograms. , 1960, Canadian Medical Association journal.