Mutation Drift and Repertoire Shift in the Maturation of the Immune Response

The halltnark of the immune response is its specificity and the specificity is directly correlated with the affinity of the antigen-antibody interaction. The requirement for high affinity antibodies may be more important than specificity alone, since antibodies are designed to detect soluble antigens which are sometimes capable of inflicting great harm at very low concentrations (e.g. toxins). This may not be required by. or may even be a disadvantage to T-cell responses where the affinity for the ligand involves interactions of the T-cell receptor not only with antigen, but also with other molecules, e.g. those involved in MHC restriction (Yague et al. 1985. Dembic et al. 1986). T cells therefore may not have developed the equivalent of the elaborate mechanism which is the object of this paper. During the course of an antigen-specific immune response, the affinity of the serum increases with time, a phenomenon commonly referred to as maturation of the response (Jerne 1951, Siskind & Benaceraff 1969). Such a maturation results from specific alterations of the structure of the antibody molecules (Steiner & Eisen 1967). What is the precise nature of these alterations, which are the root of the production of high affinity antibodies? There is no doubt that somatic mutation contributes to antibody diversity (Weigert et al. 1970. Bernard et al. 1978, Griffiths et al. 1984). There are many reasons to believe that a mechanism of hypermutation operates within restricted stretches of the DNA to further diversify the genes encoding the antibody molecules (Kim et al. 1981, Gearhart & Bogenhagen 1983). This mutational drift is, however, not the full extent of the change. Major changes in the antibody structures involved result from a shift in the antigen-specific B-cell repertoire over the course of the immune response. In the primary response the most frequent B-cell clones already expressing antibody molecules with a relatively

[1]  C. Milstein,et al.  Molecular analysis of spontaneous somatic mutants , 1977, Nature.

[2]  S. Brenner,et al.  Origin of Antibody Variation , 1966, Nature.

[3]  Leroy Hood,et al.  A single VH gene segment encodes the immune response to phosphorylcholine: Somatic mutation is correlated with the class of the antibody , 1981, Cell.

[4]  D. Wood,et al.  Different joining region J elements of the murine kappa immunoglobulin light chain locus are used at markedly different frequencies. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  R. Dildrop,et al.  A new classification of mouse VH sequences. , 1984, Immunology today.

[6]  R. Levy,et al.  Clustering of extensive somatic mutations in the variable region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain gene from a human B cell lymphoma , 1986, Cell.

[7]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  Somatic mutation and clonal expansion of B cells in an antigen‐driven immune response. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[8]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Antibody diversity: Somatic hypermutation of rearranged VH genes , 1981, Cell.

[9]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Sequences of mouse immunoglobulin light chain genes before and after somatic changes , 1978, Cell.

[10]  T. Manser,et al.  Influence of clonal selection on the expression of immunoglobulin variable region genes. , 1984, Science.

[11]  C. Milstein,et al.  Light chain germ‐line genes and the immune response to 2‐phenyloxazolone. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[12]  H. Zachau,et al.  Differences between germ-line and rearranged immunoglobulin Vκ coding sequences suggest a localized mutation mechanism , 1981, Nature.

[13]  C. Milstein,et al.  The Analysis of Structural Diversity in the Antibody Response , 1985 .

[14]  O. Mäkelä,et al.  Several V genes participate in the early phenyloxazolone response in various combinations , 1986, European journal of immunology.

[15]  J. Yagüe,et al.  The T cell receptor: the α and β chains define idiotype, and antigen and MHC specificity , 1985, Cell.

[16]  J. Lederberg Genes and antibodies. , 1959, Science.

[17]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Somatic generation of antibody diversity. , 1976, Nature.

[18]  M. Scharff,et al.  Antigen-binding mutants of mouse myeloma cells. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  G W Siskind,et al.  Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. , 1969, Advances in immunology.

[20]  A. Coutinho,et al.  Lymphocyte Population Kinetics in the Mouse , 1986, Immunological reviews.

[21]  H. Eisen,et al.  SEQUENTIAL CHANGES IN THE RELATIVE AFFINITY OF ANTIBODIES SYNTHESIZED DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE , 1967, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  C. Milstein,et al.  Somatic mutation and the maturation of immune response to 2-phenyl oxazolone , 1984, Nature.

[23]  L. Staudt,et al.  Generation of antibody diversity in the immune response of BALB/c mice to influenza virus hemagglutinin. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  D. Gray,et al.  Antigen‐Driven Selection of Virgin and Memory B Cells , 1986, Immunological reviews.

[25]  C. de Préval,et al.  Specific interaction between VH and VL regions of human monoclonal immunoglobulins. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  M. Wabl,et al.  Hypermutation at the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in a pre-B-cell line. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Bogenhagen,et al.  Clusters of point mutations are found exclusively around rearranged antibody variable genes. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  C. Milstein,et al.  mRNA sequences define an unusually restricted IgG response to 2-phenyloxazolone and its early diversification , 1983, Nature.

[29]  P. Richter,et al.  A network theory of the immune system , 1975, European journal of immunology.

[30]  M. Cohn,et al.  Variability in the Lambda Light Chain Sequences of Mouse Antibody , 1970, Nature.

[31]  C. Chothia,et al.  Domain association in immunoglobulin molecules. The packing of variable domains. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  F. Alt,et al.  Preferential utilization of the most JH-proximal VH gene segments in pre-B-cell lines , 1984, Nature.

[33]  A. Cumano,et al.  Clonal recruitment and somatic mutation in the generation of immunological memory to the hapten NP. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[34]  L. Staudt,et al.  Inter- and intraclonal diversity in the antibody response to influenza hemagglutinin , 1985, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[35]  G. M. Griffiths,et al.  Molecular events during maturation of the immune response to oxazolone , 1985, Nature.

[36]  Molecular events during the onset and maturation of the antibody response. , 1986, Biochemical Society symposium.

[37]  J. McCubrey,et al.  Transfer of specificity by murine α and β T-cell receptor genes , 1986, Nature.

[38]  T. Rabbitts,et al.  Effect of somatic mutation within translocated c-myc genes in Burkitt's lymphoma , 1984, Nature.

[39]  C. Milstein,et al.  Complete sequence of constant and 3′ noncoding regions of an immunoglobulin mRNA using the dideoxynucleotide method of RNA sequencing , 1978, Cell.

[40]  C. Milstein,et al.  Somatic Mutants and Antibody Diversity , 1977, Immunological reviews.

[41]  C. Milstein,et al.  Anti-oxazolone hybridomas and the structure of the oxazolone idiotype. , 1983, Journal of immunology.

[42]  N. K. Jerne,et al.  A study of avidity based on rabbit skin responses to diphtheria toxin-antitoxin mixtures. , 1951, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.