We present the equations for migrating inverse‐vertical‐seismic‐profile‐while‐drilling and common‐midpoint autocorrelograms. These equations partly generalize the 1D autocorrelation imaging methods of Katz and Claerbout to 2D and 3D media, and also provide a formal mathematical procedure for imaging the reflectivity distribution from autocorrelograms. The imaging conditions are designed to migrate specific events in the autocorrelograms, either the direct‐primary correlations or the direct‐ghost correlations. Here, direct stands for direct wave, primary stands for primary reflections, and ghost denotes free‐surface ghost reflections. The main advantage in migrating autocorrelograms is that the source wavelet does not need to be known, which is the case for seismic data generated by a rotating drill bit or for vibroseis data with a corrupted pilot signal. Another advantage is that the source and receiver static problems are mitigated by autocorrelation migration. Two limitations are that autocorrelation of...
[1]
Paul G. Richards,et al.
Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods
,
1980
.
[2]
Frank Scherbaum.
Seismic imaging of the site response using microearthquake recordings. Part I. Method
,
1987
.
[3]
Frank Scherbaum,et al.
Seismic imaging of the site response using microearthquake recordings. Part II. Application to the Swabian Jura, southwest Germany, Seismic network
,
1987
.
[4]
William S. French,et al.
TWO‐DIMENSIONAL AND THREE‐DIMENSIONAL MIGRATION OF MODEL‐EXPERIMENT REFLECTION PROFILES
,
1974
.
[5]
G. Schuster,et al.
Autocorrelogram migration: IVSPWD test
,
2003
.
[6]
Jon F. Claerbout,et al.
Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response
,
1968
.
[7]
Migration of Autocorrelograms
,
1997
.
[8]
Gerard T. Schuster.
Self-imaging oil fields
,
1996,
Optics & Photonics.
[9]
P. Morse,et al.
Methods of theoretical physics
,
1955
.