A Cognitive Framework for Mate Choice and Species Recognition
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Stewart H. Hulse,et al. The comparative psychology of audition : perceiving complex sounds , 1989 .
[2] M. Ritchie,et al. The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[3] M. Morris,et al. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues , 2003 .
[4] C. Manski. The structure of random utility models , 1977 .
[5] M. Ryan,et al. Female Responses to Ancestral Advertisement Calls in T�ngara Frogs , 1995, Science.
[6] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[7] T. Birdsall,et al. Theory of Signal Detectability: Deferred‐Decision Theory , 1965 .
[8] M. Ryan,et al. Neural networks predict response biases of female túngara frogs , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[9] R. Luce,et al. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .
[10] J. Endler. Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[11] L. Jones. Measurement of Values , 1959, Nature.
[12] Mark Kirkpatrick,et al. Speciation by Natural and Sexual Selection: Models and Experiments , 2002, The American Naturalist.
[13] M. Ryan,et al. SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[14] M. Ryan,et al. Sexual selection and signal evolution : the ghost of biases past , 1993 .
[15] R. Pike,et al. Response latencies in the yes/no detection task: An assessment of two basic models , 1973 .
[16] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .
[17] C. Boake,et al. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] R. Johnstone,et al. CONSPIRATORIAL WHISPERS AND CONSPICUOUS DISPLAYS: GAMES OF SIGNAL DETECTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[19] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .
[20] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[21] WALTER WILCZYNSKI,et al. The processing of spectral cues by the call analysis system of the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[22] R. Johnstone. Honest signalling, perceptual error and the evolution of ‘all-or-nothing’ displays , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[23] Johannes Schul,et al. Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[24] J. Bradbury,et al. Economic models of animal communication , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[25] Barney Luttbeg,et al. A Comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice , 1996 .
[26] M. Ryan,et al. Signal variation and call preferences for whine frequency in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[27] Peter Marler,et al. The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. , 1990 .
[28] H. Reeve,et al. The Evolution of Conspecific Acceptance Thresholds , 1989, The American Naturalist.
[29] M. Ryan,et al. Generalization in Response to Mate Recognition Signals , 2003, The American Naturalist.
[30] M. Higgie,et al. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. , 2000, Science.
[31] K. Pfennig. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate–quality recognition , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[32] A. Grafen,et al. Error-prone signalling , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[33] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[34] John A. Doherty,et al. Phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer: comparisons of choice and no-choice paradigms , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[35] D. von Helversen,et al. Selective phonotaxis in Tettigonia cantans and T. viridissima in song recognition and discrimination , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[36] M. Ryan,et al. Vestigial preference functions in neural networks and túngara frogs. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[37] M. Ryan,et al. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.
[38] H. Gerhardt. Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .
[39] Jack W. Bradbury,et al. Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .
[40] William E. Wagner. Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.