Uncertainty in aerosol–cloud radiative forcing is driven by clean conditions

Abstract. Atmospheric aerosols and their impact on cloud properties remain the largest uncertainty in the human forcing of the climate system. By increasing the concentration of cloud droplets (Nd), aerosols reduce droplet size and increase the reflectivity of clouds (a negative radiative forcing). Central to this climate impact is the susceptibility of cloud droplet number to aerosol (β), the diversity of which explains much of the variation in the radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions (RFaci) in global climate models. This has made measuring β a key target for developing observational constraints of the aerosol forcing. While the aerosol burden of the clean, pre-industrial atmosphere has been demonstrated as a key uncertainty for the aerosol forcing, here we show that the behaviour of clouds under these clean conditions is of equal importance for understanding the spread in radiative forcing estimates between models and observations. This means that the uncertainty in the aerosol impact on clouds is, counterintuitively, driven by situations with little aerosol. Discarding clean conditions produces a close agreement between different model and observational estimates of the cloud response to aerosol but does not provide a strong constraint on the RFaci. This makes constraining aerosol behaviour in clean conditions an important goal for future observational studies.

[1]  H. Jia Addressing the difficulties in quantifying droplet number response to aerosol from satellite observations , 2022 .

[2]  J. Quaas,et al.  Addressing the difficulties in quantifying the Twomey effect for marine warm clouds from multi-sensor satellite observations and reanalysis , 2021 .

[3]  A. Sorooshian,et al.  The impact of sampling strategy on the cloud droplet number concentration estimated from satellite data , 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[4]  J. Quaas,et al.  Significant underestimation of radiative forcing by aerosol–cloud interactions derived from satellite-based methods , 2021, Nature Communications.

[5]  E. Gryspeerdt,et al.  Observing the timescales of aerosol–cloud interactions in snapshot satellite images , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[6]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[7]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2020, Reviews of geophysics.

[8]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates , 2019, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[9]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Analysis of polarimetric satellite measurements suggests stronger cooling due to aerosol-cloud interactions , 2019, Nature Communications.

[10]  Sonoyo Mukai,et al.  Polarimetric remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols: Instruments, methodologies, results, and perspectives , 2019, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer.

[11]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Observational constraint on cloud susceptibility weakened by aerosol retrieval limitations , 2018, Nature Communications.

[12]  Hartwig Deneke,et al.  Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives , 2018, Reviews of geophysics.

[13]  R. Bennartz,et al.  Global and regional estimates of warm cloud droplet number concentration based on 13 years of AQUA-MODIS observations , 2017 .

[14]  S. Ghan,et al.  Constraining the instantaneous aerosol influence on cloud albedo , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  R. Wood,et al.  The global aerosol‐cloud first indirect effect estimated using MODIS, MERRA, and AeroCom , 2017 .

[16]  Kerry Meyer,et al.  A framework based on 2‐D Taylor expansion for quantifying the impacts of subpixel reflectance variance and covariance on cloud optical thickness and effective radius retrievals based on the bispectral method , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[17]  N. Bellouin,et al.  Constraining the aerosol influence on cloud fraction , 2016 .

[18]  Antti Arola,et al.  Artificial bias typically neglected in comparisons of uncertain atmospheric data , 2016 .

[19]  S. Ghan,et al.  Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Chien Wang,et al.  Metamodeling of Droplet Activation for Global Climate Models , 2016 .

[21]  L. Lee,et al.  Occurrence of pristine aerosol environments on a polluted planet , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  K. Taylor,et al.  Quantifying components of aerosol‐cloud‐radiation interactions in climate models , 2014 .

[23]  Ilan Koren,et al.  From aerosol-limited to invigoration of warm convective clouds , 2014, Science.

[24]  G. Mann,et al.  Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing , 2013, Nature.

[25]  P. Stier,et al.  Regime‐based analysis of aerosol‐cloud interactions , 2012 .

[26]  Roy G. Grainger,et al.  A sea surface reflectance model for (A)ATSR, and application to aerosol retrievals , 2010 .

[27]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data , 2009 .

[28]  H. Wernli,et al.  Aerosol- and updraft-limited regimes of cloud droplet formation: influence of particle number, size and hygroscopicity on the activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) , 2009 .

[29]  Meinrat O. Andreae,et al.  Aerosol cloud precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols , 2008 .

[30]  O. Boucher,et al.  Satellite-based estimate of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing , 2008 .

[31]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Constraining the total aerosol indirect effect in the LMDZ and ECHAM4 GCMs using MODIS satellite data , 2005 .

[32]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Relationship between surface reflectance in the visible and mid‐IR used in MODIS aerosol algorithm ‐ theory , 2002 .

[33]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[34]  S. Twomey Pollution and the Planetary Albedo , 1974 .

[35]  S. Twomey,et al.  The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration , 1959 .