Cross-Cultural Differences in Cyberbullying Behavior

The current study tested the relation between culture and cyberbullying using a short-term longitudinal research design. College-aged participants from the United States (n = 293) and Japan (n = 722) completed several questionnaires at Wave 1 that measured cyberbullying frequency, cyberbullying reinforcement, positive attitudes toward cyberbullying, and interdependent self-construal. Approximately 2 months later, participants completed the cyberbullying frequency questionnaire again. Results showed higher levels of cyberbullying change for the U.S. sample compared with the Japanese sample. Follow-up analyses showed that cyberbullying reinforcement and interdependent self-construal moderated this effect. Specifically, cyberbullying change was the highest (showing an increase over time) for the U.S. sample when reinforcement was highest and when interdependent self-construal was the lowest. Theoretical implications are discussed.

[1]  R. Florida,et al.  Creativity and Prosperity: The Global Creativity Index , 2015 .

[2]  J. Bryant,et al.  Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences. , 2012 .

[3]  Paul E. Jose,et al.  The Joint Development of Traditional Bullying and Victimization With Cyber Bullying and Victimization in Adolescence , 2012 .

[4]  Douglas A. Gentile,et al.  Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. , 2012 .

[5]  Mike Boulton,et al.  Predicting Undergraduates' Self-Reported Engagement in Traditional and Cyberbullying from Attitudes , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  A. Demetriou,et al.  A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors , 2012 .

[7]  Erkan Yaman,et al.  Cyber victim and bullying scale: A study of validity and reliability , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Kit-Aun Tan,et al.  Normative Beliefs About Aggression as a Mediator of Narcissistic Exploitativeness and Cyberbullying , 2011, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[9]  D. Cross,et al.  Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents , 2010, Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health.

[10]  Lourdes Villardón-Gallego,et al.  Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors' profile , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  I. Rivers,et al.  ‘I h8 u’: Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying , 2010 .

[12]  Özgür Erdur-Baker,et al.  Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools , 2010, New Media Soc..

[13]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  G. Steffgen.  COST-Action IS0108: Cyber bullying: Coping with negative and enhancing positive uses of new technologies, in relationships in educational settings , 2009 .

[15]  C. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Prosocial Video Games on Prosocial Behaviors: International Evidence From Correlational, Longitudinal, and Experimental Studies , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[16]  Anna Ševčíková,et al.  Online harassment and cyberbullying in the Czech Republic: Comparison across age groups. , 2009 .

[17]  Qing Li.  A cross-cultural comparison of adolescents' experience related to cyberbullying , 2008 .

[18]  Heidi Vandebosch,et al.  Defining Cyberbullying: A Qualitative Research into the Perceptions of Youngsters , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Francine Dehue,et al.  Cyberbullying: Youngsters' Experiences and Parental Perception , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. , 2008, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[21]  Katherine E. Buckley,et al.  Creating Your Own Hostile Environment: A Laboratory Examination of Trait Aggressiveness and the Violence Escalation Cycle , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  The Relationship between Cyberbullying and School Bullying , 2008 .

[23]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization , 2008 .

[24]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[25]  Jonathon Sargeant,et al.  Children being children: The value of an importance filter , 2007 .

[26]  Batja Mesquita,et al.  The cultural psychology of emotion. , 2007 .

[27]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Handbook of Cultural Psychology , 2007 .

[28]  Katherine E. Buckley,et al.  A Theoretical Model of the Effects and Consequences of Playing Video Games. , 2006 .

[29]  B. Schneider,et al.  Explaining cross-national differences in peer-directed aggression: A quantitative synthesis , 2005 .

[30]  T. Li.  Cyber-Harassment: A Study of a New Method for an Old Behavior , 2005 .

[31]  L. R. Huesmann,et al.  Human aggression: A social-cognitive view , 2003 .

[32]  C. Anderson,et al.  Human Aggression , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  R. Nisbett,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans , 2004 .

[34]  Peter K. Smith.  The nature of school bullying : a cross-national perspective , 1999 .

[35]  B. Zumbo.  A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING AS A UNITARY FRAMEWORK FOR BINARY AND LIKERT-TYPE (ORDINAL) ITEM SCORES , 1999 .

[36]  S. Cross,et al.  Models of the self: self-construals and gender. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  H. Silfverhielm,et al.  Sweden , 1996, The Lancet.

[38]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[39]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .