From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians

Objective: To document the Australian tobacco industry’s activities regarding youth smoking to support tobacco control. Method: 492 industry documents from primary and secondary websites were abstracted and analysed. Results: Australian legislation and rhetoric on youth and tobacco has changed dramatically over the last 50 years, from an unproblematic association of teenagers and smoking in the 1960s, through the industry’s aggressive attacks and denials in the 1980s, to the 1990s, when industry became newly compliant with “societal expectations” and youth became a dominant bargaining issue in the industry’s public relations strategy. The industry’s current policy is to simultaneously blame others for underage smoking, frame the industry as socially responsible via voluntary marketing codes, youth access programmes, and school education, and market actively to young adults. Conclusions: The arbitrary distinction between 17 and 18 year olds is, particularly in Australia’s dark market, a liability for tobacco control and an opportunity for the industry, which is attempting to claim the high moral ground traditionally occupied by tobacco control on the youth issue. The current review of Australia’s Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act of 1992 should prohibit all forms of industry communication targeting young people, including retail access and schools programmes and below-the-line marketing. Tobacco control advocacy should highlight the industry’s attempts to use the youth issue in its own favour while laying the blame elsewhere.

[1]  S. Carter,et al.  Going below the line: creating transportable brands for Australia’s dark market , 2003, Tobacco control.

[2]  A. Musk,et al.  Legislation for smoking control in Western Australia. , 1985, British medical journal.

[3]  R W Pollay,et al.  Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents , 2000, Tobacco control.

[4]  Is child-centered tobacco prevention a trap? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[5]  K M Cummings,et al.  Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents , 2002, Tobacco control.

[6]  Frank J. Chaloupka,et al.  Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco control , 1999, Tobacco control.

[7]  S. Carter,et al.  New frontier, new power: the retail environment in Australia's dark market. , 2003, Tobacco control.

[8]  A. Miller,et al.  Designing an effective counteradvertising campaign‐Massachusetts , 1998, Cancer.

[9]  D. Sly,et al.  Florida's "truth" campaign: a counter-marketing, anti-tobacco media campaign. , 2000, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[10]  D. Sly,et al.  The Florida “truth” anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations , 2001, Tobacco control.

[11]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Measuring the accumulated hazards of smoking: global and regional estimates for 2000 , 2003, Tobacco control.

[12]  D. Hill Why we should tackle adult smoking first , 1999, Tobacco control.

[13]  S. Glantz,et al.  It is time to abandon youth access tobacco programmes , 2002, Tobacco control.

[14]  Peter Messeri,et al.  Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[15]  Jane M. Moore,et al.  Designing an effective counteradvertising campaign‐oregon , 1998, Cancer.

[16]  Stacy M Carter Cooperation and control: the Tobacco Institute of Australia , 2003, Tobacco control.

[17]  S. Chapman A David and Goliath story: tobacco advertising and self-regulation in Australia. , 1980, British medical journal.

[18]  L. Stead,et al.  Interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  McCollom Jh,et al.  The Discussion , 1897 .

[20]  A. Charlton,et al.  Absence from school related to children's and parental smoking habits. , 1989, BMJ.

[21]  Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General--executive summary. , 2000, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[22]  L. Biener Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: what teenagers think , 2002, Tobacco control.

[23]  S Chapman,et al.  “Australia is one of the darkest markets in the world”: the global importance of Australian tobacco control , 2003, Tobacco control.

[24]  P. Macaskill,et al.  Evaluation of two school smoking education programmes under normal classroom conditions. , 1993, BMJ.

[25]  S. Carter The Australian cigarette brand as product, person, and symbol , 2003, Tobacco control.

[26]  S. L. Mann,et al.  Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention--results on smoking. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  G. Mudur Deaths trigger fresh controversy over vitamin A programme in India , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  S. Glantz,et al.  Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[29]  T. Riester,et al.  Designing an effective counteradvertising campaign‐Arizona , 1998, Cancer.

[30]  C. Perry,et al.  The tobacco industry and underage youth smoking: tobacco industry documents from the Minnesota litigation. , 1999, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.