From occupying to inhabiting - A change in conceptualising comfort

The concept of 'comfort' has been influential in shaping aspects of our built environment. For the construction industry, comfort is predominantly understood in terms of the balance between an ideal human physiological state and a finite number of measurable environmental parameters that can be controlled (temperature, humidity, air quality, daylighting, noise). It is such a notion of comfort that has informed the establishment of universally applied comfort standards and guidelines for the built environment. When buildings rigidly conform to these standards, they consume vast quantities of energy and are responsible for higher levels of GHG emissions. Recent researchers have challenged such instrumental definitions of comfort on moral and environmental grounds. In this paper, we address this issue from two different standpoints: one empirical, one related to the design of technology.

[1]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Pattern-based support for interactive design in domestic settings , 2002, DIS '02.

[2]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Buildings, Culture and Environment , 2003 .

[3]  E. Shove Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[4]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design , 1999 .

[5]  Katharine C Kolcaba PhD Rn,et al.  Comfort Theory and Practice: A Vision for Holistic Health Care and Research , 2002 .

[6]  A Auliciems,et al.  Towards a psycho-physiological model of thermal perception , 1981, International journal of biometeorology.

[7]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Toward Sustainable Consumption: Two New Perspectives , 1997 .

[8]  Willett Kempton,et al.  «I always turn it on super» : user decisions about when and how to operate room air conditioners , 1992 .

[9]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  T. R. Fort,et al.  The effects of videotape modeling and daily feedback on residential electricity conservation, home temperature and humidity, perceived comfort, and clothing worn: Winter and summer. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Answering behavioral questions about energy efficiency in buildings , 1987 .

[12]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Devices of Engagement: On Borgmann's Philosophy of Information and Technology , 2002 .

[13]  R. Cole,et al.  Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort , 2008 .

[14]  S. Healy,et al.  Air-conditioning and the ‘homogenization’ of people and built environments , 2008 .

[15]  Ellen Lupton,et al.  Case Study House: Comfort and Convenience , 1994 .

[16]  E. Shove Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[17]  Johan Redström,et al.  Switch! Energy Ecologies in Everyday Life , 2008 .

[18]  J. P. Djajadiningrat,et al.  A lost cause: the ever-improving developer's map , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.