Influence of gaze observation on random number generation.

Recent findings suggest that number processing is intimately linked to space and attention orienting processes. For example, processing numbers induces shifts of spatial attention, with small numbers causing leftward shifts and large numbers causing rightward shifts, suggesting that number magnitude might be represented on a left-to-right mental number line. However, whether inducing spatial attention shifts would in turn influence number production, and whether such influence, if observed, would be restricted to the left-to-right orientation or would extend to an up-to-down orientation in space, remains a matter of debate. The present study assessed whether observing gaze movements, known to moderate spatial attention, was able to influence a random number generation task, and how different directions of the gaze moderated this influence. Participants were asked to randomly produce a number between 1 and 10 after they observed either a horizontal or a vertical eye gaze, or after they observed color changes as a control condition. The results revealed that number production was influenced by the prior presentation of specific gaze changes. Observing leftward or downward gaze led participants to produce more small than large numbers, whereas observing gaze oriented rightward and upward or observing color changes did not influence the magnitude of the numbers produced. These results show that the characteristics of the observed gaze changes primed number magnitude, but that this only held true for some movements, and these were not restricted to the left-to-right axis.

[1]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[2]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Exploring number space by random digit generation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Random Generation , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.

[6]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  F. Mast,et al.  Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[10]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[12]  H. Ehrlichman,et al.  Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: a critical review. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Greg L. West,et al.  Testing whether gaze cues and arrow cues produce reflexive or volitional shifts of attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[17]  W. Gevers,et al.  The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  G. Vallar Spatial hemineglect in humans , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Joseph Costermans An Analysis of the Association Rates Between Numbers From 1 To 20 , 1990 .

[21]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Impairments of the mental number line for two-digit numbers in neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[22]  H. H. Clark SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[23]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Spatial representations in number processing--evidence from a pointing task , 2003 .

[24]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Head turns bias the brain's internal random generator , 2008, Current Biology.

[25]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention? , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[30]  Franco Cauda,et al.  Mental number line disruption in a right-neglect patient after a left-hemisphere stroke , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Interference between number processing and line bisection: a methodology , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[35]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Eye position predicts what number you have in mind , 2010, Current Biology.

[36]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The Capacity for Generating Information by Randomization , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  G. Galfano,et al.  Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows) , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[39]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Eye and Head Turning Indicates Cerebral Lateralization , 1972, Science.

[40]  Wim Fias,et al.  Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[41]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  The Number Space and Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[43]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.