Physics-model-based nonlinear actuator trajectory optimization and safety factor profile feedback control for advanced scenario development in DIII-D

DIII-D experimental results are reported to demonstrate the potential of physics-model-based safety factor profile control for robust and reproducible sustainment of advanced scenarios. In the absence of feedback control, variability in wall conditions and plasma impurities, as well as drifts due to external disturbances, can limit the reproducibility of discharges with simple pre-programmed scenario trajectories. The control architecture utilized is a feedforward + feedback scheme where the feedforward commands are computed off-line and the feedback commands are computed on-line. In this work, a first-principles-driven (FPD), physics-based model of the q profile and normalized beta () dynamics is first embedded into a numerical optimization algorithm to design feedforward actuator trajectories that steer the plasma through the tokamak operating space to reach a desired stationary target state that is characterized by the achieved q profile and . Good agreement between experimental results and simulations demonstrates the accuracy of the models employed for physics-model-based control design. Second, a feedback algorithm for q profile control is designed following an FPD approach, and the ability of the controller to achieve and maintain a target q profile evolution is tested in DIII-D high confinement (H-mode) experiments. The controller is shown to be able to effectively control the q profile when is relatively close to the target, indicating the need for integrated q profile and control to further enhance the ability to achieve robust scenario execution. The ability of an integrated q profile + feedback controller to track a desired target is demonstrated through simulation.

[1]  F. Hinton,et al.  Theory of plasma transport in toroidal confinement systems , 1976 .

[2]  R. J. Hawryluk,et al.  An Empirical Approach to Tokamak Transport , 1981 .

[3]  Robert James Goldston Energy confinement scaling in Tokamaks: some implications of recent experiments with Ohmic and strong auxiliary heating , 1984 .

[4]  S. Wolfe,et al.  A new look at density limits in tokamaks , 1988 .

[5]  P. Politzer,et al.  Power threshold for neutral beam current drive , 1990 .

[6]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  A Unified Computational Approach to Optimal Control Problems , 1991 .

[7]  H. E. St. John,et al.  Transport simulation of negative magnetic shear discharges , 1994 .

[8]  Gregory W. Hammett,et al.  Advances in the simulation of toroidal gyro Landau fluid model turbulence , 1995 .

[9]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[10]  T. S. Taylor,et al.  Physics of advanced tokamaks , 1997 .

[11]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Real time equilibrium reconstruction for tokamak discharge control , 1998 .

[12]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Experimental constraints on transport from dimensionless parameter scaling studies , 1998 .

[13]  D. J. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 1999 .

[14]  W. Kerner,et al.  Plasma confinement in JET H?mode plasmas with H, D, DT and T isotopes , 1999 .

[15]  F. G. Rimini,et al.  Isotope scaling of the H mode power threshold on JET , 1999 .

[16]  G. Giruzzi,et al.  GENERATION OF LOCALIZED NONINDUCTIVE CURRENT BY ELECTRON CYCLOTRON WAVES ON THE DIII-D TOKAMAK , 1999 .

[17]  O. Sauter,et al.  Neoclassical conductivity and bootstrap current formulas for general axisymmetric equilibria and arbitrary collisionality regime , 1999 .

[18]  A. G. Peeters,et al.  The bootstrap current and its consequences , 2000 .

[19]  O. Sauter,et al.  Erratum: “Neoclassical conductivity and bootstrap current formulas for general axisymmetric equilibria and arbitrary collisionality regime” [Phys. Plasmas 6, 2834 (1999)] , 2002 .

[20]  P. C. de Vries,et al.  Real-time control of the q-profile in JET for steady state advanced tokamak operation , 2003 .

[21]  C. M. Greenfield,et al.  Optimization of DIII-D advanced tokamak discharges with respect to the β limita) , 2005 .

[22]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Chapter 6: Steady state operation , 2007 .

[23]  E. Joffrin,et al.  A control-oriented model of the current profile in tokamak plasma , 2007 .

[24]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Towards model-based current profile control at DIII-D , 2007 .

[25]  J. Manickam,et al.  Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 2007 .

[26]  K. Ikeda Progress in the ITER Physics Basis , 2007 .

[27]  M. Walker,et al.  Design and simulation of extremum-seeking open-loop optimal control of current profile in the DIII-D tokamak , 2008 .

[28]  Tomonori Takizuka,et al.  Power requirement for accessing the H-mode in ITER , 2008 .

[29]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  A two-time-scale dynamic-model approach for magnetic and kinetic profile control in advanced tokamak scenarios on JET , 2008 .

[30]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  On the stability of receding horizon control of bilinear parabolic PDE systems , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[31]  E. Schuster,et al.  Ramp-Up-Phase Current-Profile Control of Tokamak Plasmas via Nonlinear Programming , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[32]  Yongsheng Ou,et al.  Robust Control Design for the Poloidal Magnetic Flux Profile Evolution in the Presence of Model Uncertainties , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[33]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Optimal Tracking Control of Current Profile in Tokamaks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[34]  T. L. Rhodes,et al.  Optimization of the safety factor profile for high noninductive current fraction discharges in DIII-D , 2011 .

[35]  Yury Orlov,et al.  Sliding mode stabilization of the current profile in Tokamak plasmas , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[36]  F. Felici,et al.  Real-time physics-model-based simulation of the current density profile in tokamak plasmas , 2011 .

[37]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Receding-horizon optimal control of the current profile evolution during the ramp-up phase of a tokamak discharge , 2011 .

[38]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Modern Anti-windup Synthesis: Control Augmentation for Actuator Saturation , 2011 .

[39]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Sequential linear quadratic control of bilinear parabolic PDEs based on POD model reduction , 2011, Autom..

[40]  F. Felici,et al.  Non-linear model-based optimization of actuator trajectories for tokamak plasma profile control , 2012 .

[41]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  A two-time-scale model-based combined magnetic and kinetic control system for advanced tokamak scenarios on DIII-D , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[42]  Mazen Alamir,et al.  Bootstrap current optimization in Tokamaks using sum-of-squares polynomials , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[43]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Optimal feedback control of the poloidal magnetic flux profile in the DIII-D tokamak based on identified plasma response models , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[44]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Toroidal current profile control during low confinement mode plasma discharges in DIII-D via first-principles-driven model-based robust control synthesis , 2012 .

[45]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Multivariable robust control of the plasma rotational transform profile for advanced tokamak scenarios in DIII-D , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[46]  Experts,et al.  Integrated magnetic and kinetic control of advanced tokamak plasmas on DIII-D based on data-driven models , 2013 .

[47]  Christophe Prieur,et al.  Lyapunov-based distributed control of the safety-factor profile in a tokamak plasma , 2013 .

[48]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  First-principles-driven model-based current profile control for the DIII-D tokamak via LQI optimal control , 2013 .

[49]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  PTRANSP simulation and experimental test of a robust current profile and βN controller for off-axis current drive scenarios in the DIII-D tokamak , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[50]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Robust control of the safety factor profile and stored energy evolutions in high performance burning plasma scenarios in the ITER tokamak , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[51]  1 Integrated Magnetic and Kinetic Control of Advanced Tokamak Scenarios Based on Data-Driven Models , 2013 .

[52]  Laurent Lefèvre,et al.  An IDA-PBC approach for the control of 1D plasma profile in tokamaks , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[53]  J. Ferron,et al.  Optimization of the Current Ramp-up Phase in DIII-D via Physics-model-based Control of Plasma Safety Factor Profile Dynamics , 2014 .

[54]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Closed-loop control of the safety factor profile in the TCV tokamak , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[55]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Experimental and Simulation Testing of Physics-model-based Safety Factor Profile and Internal Energy Feedback Controllers in DIII-D Advanced Tokamak Scenarios , 2014 .

[56]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Backstepping Control of the Toroidal Plasma Current Profile in the DIII-D Tokamak , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[57]  Wanying Wang,et al.  Conclusions and Discussion , 2014 .

[58]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Simultaneous closed-loop control of the current profile and the electron temperature profile in the TCV tokamak , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).

[59]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  First-principles-driven model-based optimal control of the current profile in NSTX-U , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA).

[60]  J. Barton Physics-model-based Optimization and Feedback Control of the Current Profile Dynamics in Fusion Tokamak Reactors , 2015 .

[61]  F. Verheest Symmetries and charge neutrality of electromagnetic solitons in perfect pair plasmas , 2015 .