The c-SMAC

T cells integrate and transduce the key signals necessary to mount an appropriate immune response. To do this, they rely on both secreted factors as well as physical cell-cell contact. Much attention has focused on the organization of proteins at the contact area between a T cell and an antigen-presenting cell, known as the immunological synapse. It has been shown in vitro that proteins segregate into two distinct regions within this contact area, a central area referred to as the c-SMAC, where the T cell receptor and associated signaling molecules are enriched, and a peripheral region called the p-SMAC containing LFA-1 and the scaffolding protein talin. Whether or not these structures form in vivo and how they function in T cell activation remain issues of great interest. Here, we review recently published work and propose several possible functions for the role of the c-SMAC in T cell activation.

[1]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  Antigen-Engaged B Cells Undergo Chemotaxis toward the T Zone and Form Motile Conjugates with Helper T Cells , 2005, PLoS biology.

[2]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[3]  Sebastian Amigorena,et al.  Distinct T cell dynamics in lymph nodes during the induction of tolerance and immunity , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[4]  Randall L. Lindquist,et al.  Visualizing dendritic cell networks in vivo , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[5]  Michael D. Cahalan,et al.  Imaging the Single Cell Dynamics of CD4+ T Cell Activation by Dendritic Cells in Lymph Nodes , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[6]  R. Germain,et al.  Illuminating the landscape of in vivo immunity: insights from dynamic in situ imaging of secondary lymphoid tissues. , 2004, Immunity.

[7]  C. Sumen,et al.  ReviewIntravital Microscopy : Visualizing Immunity in Context , 2004 .

[8]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[9]  B. Nal,et al.  Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse; involvement of SNARE complexes. , 2004, Immunity.

[10]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[11]  I. Macara Par Proteins: Partners in Polarization , 2004, Current Biology.

[12]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  T cell repertoire scanning is promoted by dynamic dendritic cell behavior and random T cell motility in the lymph node. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Henrickson,et al.  T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases , 2004, Nature.

[14]  Olivier Lantz,et al.  Dendritic Cell Maturation Controls Adhesion, Synapse Formation, and the Duration of the Interactions with Naive T Lymphocytes , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[15]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Cytotoxic T lymphocytes form an antigen-independent ring junction. , 2004, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  T-cell-antigen recognition and the immunological synapse , 2003, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[17]  M. Bonneville,et al.  Uncoupling between Immunological Synapse Formation and Functional Outcome in Human γδ T Lymphocytes , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[18]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  The Immunological Synapse Balances T Cell Receptor Signaling and Degradation , 2003, Science.

[19]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[20]  Maciej J. Swat,et al.  Cytoskeletal remodeling in lymphocyte activation. , 2003, Current opinion in immunology.

[21]  Philippe Bousso,et al.  Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[22]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T cell fitness determined by signal strength , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[23]  Stephen P. Schoenberger,et al.  Dynamic programming of CD8+ T lymphocyte responses , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[24]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  Autonomous T cell trafficking examined in vivo with intravital two-photon microscopy , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Bonneville,et al.  Uncoupling between immunological synapse formation and functional outcome in human gamma delta T lymphocytes. , 2003, Journal of immunology.

[26]  M. Naramura,et al.  c-Cbl and Cbl-b regulate T cell responsiveness by promoting ligand-induced TCR down-modulation , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[27]  G. Bismuth,et al.  Imaging antigen-induced PI3K activation in T cells , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[28]  Michael D. Cahalan,et al.  Two-photon tissue imaging: seeing the immune system in a fresh light , 2002, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[29]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[30]  D. Cantrell,et al.  Sustained and dynamic inositol lipid metabolism inside and outside the immunological synapse , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[31]  R. Germain,et al.  Dynamic Imaging of T Cell-Dendritic Cell Interactions in Lymph Nodes , 2002, Science.

[32]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  The immunological synapse , 2002, Arthritis research.

[33]  R. Zaru,et al.  Cutting Edge: TCR Engagement and Triggering in the Absence of Large-Scale Molecular Segregation at the T Cell-APC Contact Site1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[34]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Imaging synapse formation during thymocyte selection: inability of CD3zeta to form a stable central accumulation during negative selection. , 2002, Immunity.

[35]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  T Cell Receptor Signaling Precedes Immunological Synapse Formation , 2002, Science.

[36]  Christoph Wülfing,et al.  Costimulation and endogenous MHC ligands contribute to T cell recognition , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[37]  G. Griffiths,et al.  The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. , 2001, Immunity.

[38]  S. Takahashi,et al.  ERM-dependent movement of CD43 defines a novel protein complex distal to the immunological synapse. , 2001, Immunity.

[39]  R. Germain,et al.  Exclusion of CD43 from the immunological synapse is mediated by phosphorylation-regulated relocation of the cytoskeletal adaptor moesin. , 2001, Immunity.

[40]  B. Freiberg,et al.  Formation of supramolecular activation clusters on fresh ex vivo CD8+ T cells after engagement of the T cell antigen receptor and CD8 by antigen-presenting cells , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Ira Mellman,et al.  Dendritic Cells Specialized and Regulated Antigen Processing Machines , 2001, Cell.

[42]  E. Ingulli,et al.  Cutting Edge: In Vivo Identification of TCR Redistribution and Polarized IL-2 Production by Naive CD4 T Cells1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[43]  L. Samelson,et al.  Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. , 2001, Immunity.

[44]  D. Wiest,et al.  On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. , 2000, Immunity.

[45]  T. Pawson,et al.  A mammalian PAR-3–PAR-6 complex implicated in Cdc42/Rac1 and aPKC signalling and cell polarity , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  Michael L. Dustin,et al.  The immunological synapse and the actin cytoskeleton: molecular hardware for T cell signaling , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[47]  M. Jackson,et al.  T Cells Can Use Either T Cell Receptor or Cd28 Receptors to Absorb and Internalize Cell Surface Molecules Derived from Antigen-Presenting Cells , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[48]  B. Alarcón,et al.  Internalization and intracellular fate of TCR-CD3 complexes. , 2000, Critical reviews in immunology.

[49]  M. Jackson,et al.  TCR-Mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. , 1999, Science.

[50]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[51]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Costimulation: Building an Immunological Synapse , 1999, Science.

[52]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[53]  G. Drewes,et al.  MAPs, MARKs and microtubule dynamics. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[54]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. , 1998, Immunity.

[55]  H. Eisen,et al.  Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. , 1996, Immunity.

[56]  J. Chant,et al.  Regulation of the polarization of T cells toward antigen-presenting cells by Ras-related GTPase CDC42. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  H. Grey,et al.  The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. , 1990, Science.

[58]  Emil R. Unanue,et al.  Quantitation of antigen-presenting cell MHC class II/peptide complexes necessary for T-cell stimulation , 1990, Nature.

[59]  Charles A. Janeway,et al.  Receptor-directed focusing of lymphokine release by helper T cells , 1988, Nature.

[60]  A. Weiss,et al.  Ligand-receptor interactions required for commitment to the activation of the interleukin 2 gene. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[61]  C. Janeway,et al.  The specific direct interaction of helper T cells and antigen-presenting B cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  A. Kupfer,et al.  Reorientation of the microtubule-organizing center and the Golgi apparatus in cloned cytotoxic lymphocytes triggered by binding to lysable target cells. , 1984, Journal of immunology.

[63]  G. Carpenter,et al.  Down regulation of epidermal growth factor receptors: direct demonstration of receptor degradation in human fibroblasts , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[64]  S. Singer,et al.  Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center within cloned natural killer cells bound to their targets. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.