The c-SMAC
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mark J. Miller,et al. Antigen-Engaged B Cells Undergo Chemotaxis toward the T Zone and Form Motile Conjugates with Helper T Cells , 2005, PLoS biology.
[2] Morgan Huse,et al. Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.
[3] Sebastian Amigorena,et al. Distinct T cell dynamics in lymph nodes during the induction of tolerance and immunity , 2004, Nature Immunology.
[4] Randall L. Lindquist,et al. Visualizing dendritic cell networks in vivo , 2004, Nature Immunology.
[5] Michael D. Cahalan,et al. Imaging the Single Cell Dynamics of CD4+ T Cell Activation by Dendritic Cells in Lymph Nodes , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[6] R. Germain,et al. Illuminating the landscape of in vivo immunity: insights from dynamic in situ imaging of secondary lymphoid tissues. , 2004, Immunity.
[7] C. Sumen,et al. ReviewIntravital Microscopy : Visualizing Immunity in Context , 2004 .
[8] Arup K Chakraborty,et al. CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.
[9] B. Nal,et al. Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse; involvement of SNARE complexes. , 2004, Immunity.
[10] Mark M Davis,et al. T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.
[11] I. Macara. Par Proteins: Partners in Polarization , 2004, Current Biology.
[12] Mark J. Miller,et al. T cell repertoire scanning is promoted by dynamic dendritic cell behavior and random T cell motility in the lymph node. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[13] S. Henrickson,et al. T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases , 2004, Nature.
[14] Olivier Lantz,et al. Dendritic Cell Maturation Controls Adhesion, Synapse Formation, and the Duration of the Interactions with Naive T Lymphocytes , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.
[15] Michael Loran Dustin,et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes form an antigen-independent ring junction. , 2004, The Journal of clinical investigation.
[16] Mark M. Davis,et al. T-cell-antigen recognition and the immunological synapse , 2003, Nature Reviews Immunology.
[17] M. Bonneville,et al. Uncoupling between Immunological Synapse Formation and Functional Outcome in Human γδ T Lymphocytes , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.
[18] Arup K Chakraborty,et al. The Immunological Synapse Balances T Cell Receptor Signaling and Degradation , 2003, Science.
[19] Mark M Davis,et al. Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential , 2003, Nature Immunology.
[20] Maciej J. Swat,et al. Cytoskeletal remodeling in lymphocyte activation. , 2003, Current opinion in immunology.
[21] Philippe Bousso,et al. Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes , 2003, Nature Immunology.
[22] Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al. T cell fitness determined by signal strength , 2003, Nature Immunology.
[23] Stephen P. Schoenberger,et al. Dynamic programming of CD8+ T lymphocyte responses , 2003, Nature Immunology.
[24] Mark J. Miller,et al. Autonomous T cell trafficking examined in vivo with intravital two-photon microscopy , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] M. Bonneville,et al. Uncoupling between immunological synapse formation and functional outcome in human gamma delta T lymphocytes. , 2003, Journal of immunology.
[26] M. Naramura,et al. c-Cbl and Cbl-b regulate T cell responsiveness by promoting ligand-induced TCR down-modulation , 2002, Nature Immunology.
[27] G. Bismuth,et al. Imaging antigen-induced PI3K activation in T cells , 2002, Nature Immunology.
[28] Michael D. Cahalan,et al. Two-photon tissue imaging: seeing the immune system in a fresh light , 2002, Nature Reviews Immunology.
[29] Mark M. Davis,et al. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.
[30] D. Cantrell,et al. Sustained and dynamic inositol lipid metabolism inside and outside the immunological synapse , 2002, Nature Immunology.
[31] R. Germain,et al. Dynamic Imaging of T Cell-Dendritic Cell Interactions in Lymph Nodes , 2002, Science.
[32] Michael Loran Dustin,et al. The immunological synapse , 2002, Arthritis research.
[33] R. Zaru,et al. Cutting Edge: TCR Engagement and Triggering in the Absence of Large-Scale Molecular Segregation at the T Cell-APC Contact Site1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.
[34] Mark M. Davis,et al. Imaging synapse formation during thymocyte selection: inability of CD3zeta to form a stable central accumulation during negative selection. , 2002, Immunity.
[35] Michael Loran Dustin,et al. T Cell Receptor Signaling Precedes Immunological Synapse Formation , 2002, Science.
[36] Christoph Wülfing,et al. Costimulation and endogenous MHC ligands contribute to T cell recognition , 2002, Nature Immunology.
[37] G. Griffiths,et al. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. , 2001, Immunity.
[38] S. Takahashi,et al. ERM-dependent movement of CD43 defines a novel protein complex distal to the immunological synapse. , 2001, Immunity.
[39] R. Germain,et al. Exclusion of CD43 from the immunological synapse is mediated by phosphorylation-regulated relocation of the cytoskeletal adaptor moesin. , 2001, Immunity.
[40] B. Freiberg,et al. Formation of supramolecular activation clusters on fresh ex vivo CD8+ T cells after engagement of the T cell antigen receptor and CD8 by antigen-presenting cells , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[41] Ira Mellman,et al. Dendritic Cells Specialized and Regulated Antigen Processing Machines , 2001, Cell.
[42] E. Ingulli,et al. Cutting Edge: In Vivo Identification of TCR Redistribution and Polarized IL-2 Production by Naive CD4 T Cells1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.
[43] L. Samelson,et al. Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. , 2001, Immunity.
[44] D. Wiest,et al. On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. , 2000, Immunity.
[45] T. Pawson,et al. A mammalian PAR-3–PAR-6 complex implicated in Cdc42/Rac1 and aPKC signalling and cell polarity , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.
[46] Michael L. Dustin,et al. The immunological synapse and the actin cytoskeleton: molecular hardware for T cell signaling , 2000, Nature Immunology.
[47] M. Jackson,et al. T Cells Can Use Either T Cell Receptor or Cd28 Receptors to Absorb and Internalize Cell Surface Molecules Derived from Antigen-Presenting Cells , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[48] B. Alarcón,et al. Internalization and intracellular fate of TCR-CD3 complexes. , 2000, Critical reviews in immunology.
[49] M. Jackson,et al. TCR-Mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. , 1999, Science.
[50] S. Bromley,et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.
[51] Michael Loran Dustin,et al. Costimulation: Building an Immunological Synapse , 1999, Science.
[52] Colin R. F. Monks,et al. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.
[53] G. Drewes,et al. MAPs, MARKs and microtubule dynamics. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[54] A. Lanzavecchia,et al. The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. , 1998, Immunity.
[55] H. Eisen,et al. Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. , 1996, Immunity.
[56] J. Chant,et al. Regulation of the polarization of T cells toward antigen-presenting cells by Ras-related GTPase CDC42. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[57] H. Grey,et al. The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. , 1990, Science.
[58] Emil R. Unanue,et al. Quantitation of antigen-presenting cell MHC class II/peptide complexes necessary for T-cell stimulation , 1990, Nature.
[59] Charles A. Janeway,et al. Receptor-directed focusing of lymphokine release by helper T cells , 1988, Nature.
[60] A. Weiss,et al. Ligand-receptor interactions required for commitment to the activation of the interleukin 2 gene. , 1987, Journal of immunology.
[61] C. Janeway,et al. The specific direct interaction of helper T cells and antigen-presenting B cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[62] A. Kupfer,et al. Reorientation of the microtubule-organizing center and the Golgi apparatus in cloned cytotoxic lymphocytes triggered by binding to lysable target cells. , 1984, Journal of immunology.
[63] G. Carpenter,et al. Down regulation of epidermal growth factor receptors: direct demonstration of receptor degradation in human fibroblasts , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.
[64] S. Singer,et al. Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center within cloned natural killer cells bound to their targets. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.