Small doses of remifentanil or sufentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation: a double-blind comparison

Background and objective To compare the effects on cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation when small doses of either remifentanil or sufentanil are used in the presence of midazolam. Methods Thirty normotensive, ASA physical status I–II patients, receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery, received an intravenous midazolam premedication (0.05 mg kg−1) 10 min before induction. They were randomly allocated to receive in a double-blind fashion an intravenous bolus of either (a) remifentanil given as a bolus dose 1 µg kg−1 (n = 15), or else (b) sufentanil 0.1 µg kg−1 infused over 60 s (n = 15). In each instance this loading dose was followed by a continuous intravenous infusion (0.1 µg kg−1 min−1 or 0.01 µg kg−1 min−1 of remifentanil or sufentanil, respectively). General anaesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg kg−1), followed by atracurium besilate (0.5 mg kg−1) to facilitate tracheal intubation. Following intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated with a 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen mixture and a 1% inspired sevoflurane. Results Arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction of anaesthesia (baseline), immediately before intubation, immediately after tracheal intubation and every minute for the first five minutes thereafter. No differences in systolic and diastolic arterial pressures were observed between the two groups. At the end of the study period, systolic and diastolic pressures slightly decreased from preinduction values in both groups. Four patients in the remifentanil group (26%) and five patients in sufentanil group (33%) showed at least one systolic pressure value < 90 mmHg during the study period (P = not significant); however, the observed decreases in systolic pressure were transient and did not require treatment. Heart rate values were not affected by tracheal intubation in either group. Conclusions In healthy normotensive patients without cardiovascular disease the use of a relatively small dose of either remifentanil or sufentanil after standard midazolam premedication results in a similar and clinically acceptable effectiveness in blunting the cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation.

[1]  J. van Egmond,et al.  Evaluation of the electroencephalographic bispectral index during fentanyl-midazolam anaesthesia for cardiac surgery. Does it predict haemodynamic responses during endotracheal intubation and sternotomy? , 1999, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[2]  D. Mcatamney,et al.  Bolus dose remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  J. Russell,et al.  Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. , 1998, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  Dong-Chan Kim,et al.  Small-Dose Fentanyl: Optimal Time of Injection for Blunting the Circulatory Responses to Tracheal Intubation , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  J. Bennett,et al.  Difficult or Impossible Ventilation after Sufentanil‐induced Anesthesia Is Caused Primarily by Vocal Cord Closure , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[6]  S Howell,et al.  Drug interactions: volatile anesthetics and opioids. , 1997, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[7]  I. R. Thomson,et al.  Dose-response to anaesthetic induction with sufentanil: haemodynamic and electroencephalographic effects , 1997, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[8]  R. Howard-Griffin,et al.  Co‐induction and laryngeal mask insertion# A comparison of thiopentone versus propofol , 1997, Anaesthesia.

[9]  C. Kindler,et al.  Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: a double-blind, controlled clinical trial. , 1996, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[10]  P. Glass,et al.  Preliminary Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of an Ultra‐Short‐Acting Opioid: Remifentanil (GI87084B) , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  R. Martineau,et al.  Effects of Alfentanil on the Hemodynamic and Catecholamine Response to Tracheal Intubation , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  D. Reich,et al.  Haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation following etomidate and fentanyl for anaesthetic induction , 1992, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie.

[13]  D. Silverman,et al.  A comparison of fentanyl, esmolol, and their combination for blunting the haemodynamic responses during rapid-sequence induction , 1992, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[14]  R. Martineau,et al.  Bolus administration of esmolol for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: the canadian multicentre trial , 1991, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[15]  James C. Scott,et al.  Electroencephalographic quantitation of opioid effect: comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and sufentanil. , 1991, Anesthesiology.

[16]  N. Maekawa,et al.  The effect of diltiazem on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation , 1990, Anaesthesia.

[17]  S. Mostafa,et al.  Effects of nebulized lignocaine on the intraocular pressure responses to tracheal intubation. , 1990, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  K. A. East,et al.  Differences in Magnitude and Duration of Opioid‐Induced Respiratory Depression and Analgesia with Fentanyl and Sufentanil , 1990, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  A. Namiki,et al.  Attenuation of the pressor response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with intravenous verapamil , 1989, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  R. Stoelting Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Changes During Short‐Duration Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation: Influence of Viscous or Intravenous Lidocaine , 1978, Anesthesia and analgesia.