Higher-order behavior classes: contingencies, beliefs, and verbal behavior.

The concepts of reinforcement and of higher-order classes of behavior are reviewed and applied to analyses of self-reinforcement, self-efficacy, the causal status of private events, and the role of verbal behavior in human action. The analyses support the case that Bandura's criticisms of behavior analytic thought rest upon several misunderstandings, the most important of which are the distinctions between theories and phenomena and a neglect of the process of ontogenic selection. Bandura's persistence in promoting these misunderstandings is puzzling, because over a period of at least two decades he has repeated without substantial correction arguments that were refuted at the time he first made them. Bandura's views on these concepts can be interpreted as a contemporary variety of creationism in behavioral science.

[1]  C. Shimp.  Contemporary behaviorism versus the old behavioral straw man in Gardner's The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution1. , 1989 .

[2]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. , 1973 .

[3]  W H MORSE,et al.  Some factors involved in the stimulus control of operant behavior. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  B. Skinner,et al.  The operational analysis of psychological terms , 1945, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  B. Hart,et al.  Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[6]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[7]  Right-left and up-down are equally discriminable in the absence of directional words , 1979 .

[8]  A C Catania,et al.  Editorial: On the vocabulary and the grammar of behavior. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  S. Hayes,et al.  Rule-Governed Behavior: A Potential Theoretical Framework for Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy , 1982 .

[10]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. , 1986 .

[11]  A. Catania.  Some Darwinian lessons for behavior analysis: A review of Bowler's The Eclipse of Darwinism1. , 1987 .

[12]  B. F. Skinner, organism. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[13]  C F Lowe,et al.  The role of verbal behavior in human learning: III. Instructional effects in children. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  L. Squire.  Encyclopedia of learning and memory. , 1992 .

[15]  J. Greenspoon,et al.  The reinforcing effect of two spoken sounds on the frequency of two responses. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  A. Bandura,et al.  Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Rescorla.  Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. , 1991 .

[19]  C F Lowe,et al.  The role of verbal behavior in human learning: II. Developmental differences. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Self-Reinforcement: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations , 1976 .

[21]  B. Skinner.  Contingencies Of Reinforcement , 1969 .

[22]  J. Schooler,et al.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  H. Schlinger,et al.  Function-Altering Effects of Contingency-Specifying Stimuli , 1987, The Behavior analyst.

[24]  J Czubaroff.  Criticism and response in the Skinner controversies. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-reinforcement in pigeons , 1972 .

[26]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Self-control: Beyond commitment. , 1995 .

[27]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[28]  A C Catania,et al.  Nonverbal behavior correlated with the shaped verbal behavior of children , 1990, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[29]  B. Skinner.  An operant analysis of problem solving , 1984, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  O. I. Lovaas,et al.  CUE PROPERTIES OF WORDS: THE CONTROL OF OPERANT RESPONDING BY RATE AND CONTENT OF VERBAL OPERANTS. , 1964, Child development.

[31]  A Bandura,et al.  Comments on the crusade against the causal efficacy of human thought. , 1995, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[32]  W M Baum,et al.  The correlation-based law of effect. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[33]  B. Iwata,et al.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[34]  C. Poulson.  Operant theory and methodology in infant vocal conditioning. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Increasing intrinsic interest with superfluous extrinsic constraints. , 1982 .

[36]  S. Hayes.  Rule-governed behavior : cognition, contingencies, and instructional control , 1989 .

[37]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  Properties of rule-governed behaviour and their implications. , 1990 .

[38]  R. Baer,et al.  On the functional role of the verbalization in correspondence training procedures. , 1988, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Rule-Governed Behavior , 1989 .

[40]  Advances in Cognitive-Behavioral Research and Therapy , 1982, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[41]  E. Kymissis,et al.  Generalized imitation in infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[42]  A. Catania.  The Gifts of Culture and of Eloquence: An Open Letter to Michael J. Mahoney in Reply to His Article, “Scientific Psychology and Radical Behaviorism” , 1991, The Behavior analyst.

[43]  J. L. Gewirtz,et al.  Learning of generalized imitation as the basis for identification. , 1968, Psychological review.

[44]  E K Morris,et al.  Misconception and Miseducation: Presentations of Radical Behaviorism in Psychology Textbooks , 1983, The Behavior analyst.

[45]  O. I. Lovaas,et al.  Interaction between verbal and nonverbal behavior. , 1961, Child development.

[46]  R. Dawkins.  The Blind Watchmaker , 1986 .

[47]  David K. Simkin,et al.  Quantitative Analyses of Behavior. Volume IV. Discrimination Processes , 1985 .

[48]  F. Svartdal.  Shaping of rule-governed behaviour. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[49]  P. Hineline.  The origins of environment-based psychological theory. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[50]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. , 1976 .

[51]  R. Rescorla.  Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is. , 1988 .