Supporting peer interaction in online learning environments.

This paper reports two studies into the efficacy of sentence openers to foster online peer-to-peer interaction. Sentence openers are pre-defined ways to start an utterance that are implemented in communication facilities as menu’s or buttons. In the first study, typical opening phrases were derived from naturally occurring online dialogues. The resulting set of sentence openers was implemented in a semi-structured chat tool that allowed students to compose messages in a freetext area or via sentence openers. In the second study, this tool was used to explore the students’ appreciation and unprompted use of sentence openers. Results indicate that students hardly used sentence openers and were skeptical of their usefulness. Because both measures were negatively correlated with students’ prior chat experience, optional use of sentence openers may not be the best way to support students’ online interaction. Based on these findings, alternative ways of using sentence openers are discussed and topics for further research are advanced.

[1]  Jos Beishuizen,et al.  FILE: a tool for the study of inquiry learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Design Principles for Distributed Knowledge Building Processes , 1998 .

[3]  M. Matessa.  Interactive Models of Collaborative Communication , 2001 .

[4]  Janet E. Cahn,et al.  A Psychological Model of Grounding and Repair in Dialog , 1999 .

[5]  Stephanie Jarboe,et al.  Procedures for Enhancing Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[6]  Judy Robertson,et al.  BetterBlether: The Design and Evaluation of a Discussion Tool for education , 1998 .

[7]  Mark K. Singley,et al.  Algebra jam: supporting teamwork and managing roles in a collaborative learning environment , 2000, CSCW '00.

[8]  Robert M. Aiken,et al.  Monitoring computer-based collaborative problem solving , 1995 .

[9]  Naomi S. Baron.  Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email. , 1998 .

[10]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 1997 .

[11]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[12]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum , 2000 .

[13]  John Cook.  Cooperative Problem-Seeking Dialogues in Learning , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[14]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Communication and Group Decision-Making , 1986 .

[15]  A. E. Veldhuis-Diermanse,et al.  Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education , 2001 .

[16]  Robert M. Aiken,et al.  Teaching collaborative skills with a group leader computer tutor , 1996, Education and Information Technologies.

[17]  Amy Soller,et al.  Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System , 2001 .

[18]  CHRISTINE HOWE,et al.  Computer support for learning in collaborative contexts: prompted hypothesis testing in physics , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[19]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone , 1999 .

[20]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes: Testing the Connections in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .

[22]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Carol K. K. Chan.  Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information , 2001 .

[24]  A. King.  ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning , 1997 .

[25]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .