Investigating the links between the process parameters and their influence on the aesthetic evaluation of selective laser melted parts

This study is a precursor to gaining a deeper understanding of how each parameter of the Additive Manufacturing (AM) process influences the aesthetic properties of 3D printed products. Little research has been conducted on this specific aspect of AM. Using insights from the work presented in this paper, we intend to develop design support tools to give the designer more control over the printed products in terms of aesthetics. In this initial work, we fabricated samples using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technology, and investigated the parameters geometry, building strategy, and post-processing. We asked participants to evaluate the visual and physical interaction with the manufactured samples. Results show that, in addition to geometry and post-processing, the aesthetic evaluation can also be strongly influenced by the SLM process’ building strategy. This understanding will enable us to develop tools to give designers more control over the part’s aesthetic appearance. In addition, we present a systematic procedure and setup to evaluate the aesthetic appearance of products manufactured using AM.

[1]  Daniel Thomas.  The development of design rules for selective laser melting , 2009 .

[2]  T. V. Rompay,et al.  Expressions: Embodiment in the experience of design , 2005 .

[3]  Bernhard Mueller,et al.  Additive Manufacturing Technologies – Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing , 2012 .

[4]  Binh Pham,et al.  Design for aesthetics: interactions of design variables and aesthetic properties , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  L. Rampino,et al.  Digital aesthetic of new products obtained by selective laser melting process , 2015 .

[6]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[7]  Vimal Dhokia,et al.  A Surface Modification Decision Tree to Influence Design in Additive Manufacturing , 2016 .

[8]  P. Hekkert,et al.  Meanings of materials through sensorial properties and manufacturing processes , 2009 .

[9]  Richard J.M. Hague,et al.  Integration of Solid Freeform Fabrication in Design , 2001 .

[10]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  D. I. Wimpenny,et al.  On Optimization of Surface Roughness of Selective Laser Melted Stainless Steel Parts: A Statistical Study , 2014, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[12]  Johann Sienz,et al.  Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting , 2014, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[13]  Christiane B. Wiebel,et al.  Perceptual qualities and material classes. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[14]  J. Eckert,et al.  Comparison of different post processing technologies for SLM generated 316l steel parts , 2013 .

[15]  Jouke Verlinden,et al.  Optimal Design for Additive Manufacturing: Opportunities and Challenges , 2011 .

[16]  Babak Kianian,et al.  Wohlers Report 2016: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry, Annual Worldwide Progress Report: Chapter title: The Middle East , 2016 .

[17]  Maria Vittoria Diamanti,et al.  Production and Anodic Colouring of Newly-Designed Titanium Jewels , 2010 .

[18]  Eujin Pei,et al.  Development of a design feature database to support design for additive manufacturing , 2012 .

[19]  Thomas Vietor,et al.  A new methodological framework for design for additive manufacturing , 2016 .

[20]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Computer-Aided Design for Additive Manufacturing of Cellular Structures , 2007 .

[21]  Vimal Dhokia,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR TESTING THE FINISHING OF ADDITIVE PARTS , 2015 .

[22]  David W. Rosen,et al.  A HYBRID GEOMETRIC MODELING METHOD FOR LARGE SCALE CONFORMAL CELLULAR STRUCTURES , 2005 .

[23]  Elvin Karana,et al.  A tool for meaning driven materials selection , 2010 .

[24]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  A designer's guide for dimensioning and tolerancing SLS parts , 2012 .

[25]  R. Everson,et al.  Surface roughness analysis, modelling and prediction in selective laser melting , 2013 .