Input-output substitutability and strongly monotonic p-norm least distance DEA measures

In DEA, there are two frameworks for efficiency assessment and targeting: the greatest and the least distance framework. The greatest distance framework provides us with the efficient targets that are determined by the farthest projections to the assessed decision making unit via maximization of the p-norm relative to either the strongly efficient frontier or the weakly efficient frontier. Non-radial measures belonging to the class of greatest distance measures are the slacks-based measure (SBM) and the range-adjusted measure (RAM). Whereas these greatest distance measures have traditionally been utilized because of their computational ease, least distance projections are quite often more appropriate than greatest distance projections from the perspective of managers of decision-making units because closer efficient targets may be attained with less effort. In spite of this desirable feature of the least distance framework, the least distance (in) efficiency versions of the additive measure, SBM and RAM do not even satisfy weak monotonicity. In this study, therefore, we introduce and investigate least distance p-norm inefficiency measures that satisfy strong monotonicity over the strongly efficient frontier. In order to develop these measures, we extend a free disposable set and introduce a tradeoff set that implements input–output substitutability.

[1]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA , 1999 .

[2]  Akiko Takeda,et al.  On measuring the inefficiency with the inner-product norm in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Decomposing the efficient frontier of the DEA production possibility set into a smallest number of convex polyhedrons by mixed integer programming , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[5]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA , 2007 .

[7]  Gleb A. Koshevoy,et al.  On the existence of a technical efficiency criterion , 1991 .

[8]  Eduardo González,et al.  From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  An efficiency measure satisfying the Dmitruk–Koshevoy criteria on DEA technologies , 2012 .

[10]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  On the Functional Form of an Efficiency Index , 1998 .

[11]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure: Comment , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[12]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Measures of technical efficiency , 1985 .

[13]  Atsuhiko Kai,et al.  LEAST DISTANCE BASED INEFFICIENCY MEASURES ON THE PARETO-EFFICIENT FRONTIER IN DEA , 2012 .

[14]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies , 2003 .

[15]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Continuity of measures of technical efficiency , 1990 .

[16]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Multiple Output Production Technologies , 1983 .

[17]  Walter Briec,et al.  Hölder Distance Function and Measurement of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[18]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Axiomatic foundations of efficiency measurement on data-generated technologies , 2009 .

[19]  G. Bol On technical efficiency measures: A remark , 1986 .

[20]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..

[21]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[23]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[24]  J. Pastor,et al.  On how to properly calculate the Euclidean distance-based measure in DEA , 2014 .

[25]  Chulwoo Baek,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[26]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[27]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[28]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Variations on the theme of slacks-based measure of efficiency in DEA , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..