A Web-Based Intervention to Encourage Walking (StepWise): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Despite Internet-based interventions that incorporate pedometers with appropriate goal-setting processes and other theoretically-based behavior change strategies being proposed as a means of increasing walking behavior, few have incorporated all of these key features or assessed maintenance of behavior change. Objective The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of a 12-week pedometer step goal walking program individually tailored to baseline step counts, combined with an interactive support website for step counts, health parameters and motivation over 12 and 24 weeks. Methods Low active participants (mean [SD] 46.2 [11.2] years) were randomly assigned to the Stepwise (SW) intervention group (n=49) or a comparison (CP) group (n=48). SW received a pedometer, step goal walking program and access to the SW website (containing interactive self-monitoring and goal feedback tools, motivational messages and action and coping planning strategies). CP received a pedometer and locally available physical activity information. Step counts, BMI, resting heart rate, blood pressure and glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride levels, psychological well-being, perceived health, self-efficacy and self-determined motivation were measured at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Results Linear mixed model analysis found that both groups’ step counts increased from baseline to week 12 (β = 11,002, CI 5739-16,266, P<.001) and 24 (β = 6810, CI 1190-12,431; P=.02). Group step counts were significantly different at week 24 with SW taking 8939 (CI 274-17604, P=.04) more steps compared to CP. Compared to baseline, both groups had improved triglyceride levels (0.14 mmol/L, CI -0.25 to -0.02, P=.02) at week 12, decreased diastolic blood pressure (4.22 mmHg, CI -6.73 to -1.72) at weeks 12 and 24 (3.17 mmHg, CI -5.55 to -0.78), improved positive (β = .21, CI 0.03-0.38, P=.02) and negative affect (β = -.15, CI -0.28 to -0.03, P=.02) at week 12, and perceived health at week 12 (β = 6.37, CI 2.10-10.65, P=.004) and 24 (β = 8.52, CI 3.98-13.06, P<.001). Total cholesterol increased at week 12 (0.26 mmol/L, CI 0.099-0.423, P=.006) and week 24 (0.38 mmol/L, CI 0.20-0.56, P<.001). Repeated measures ANOVA found motivation for walking improved from baseline with higher task self-efficacy (P<.001, η2 = .13) and autonomous motivation (P<.001, η2=.14) at weeks 12 and 24 and decreased controlled motivation (P=.004, η2=.08) at week 24. Conclusions Both groups had similar improvements in step counts and physical and psychological health after 12 weeks but only the SW group successfully maintained the increased step-counts 24 weeks post-intervention. This suggests the step-goal based walking program combined with Internet-based behavior change tools were important for sustained behavior change.

[1]  S. Marshall,et al.  Effect of Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Interventions , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[2]  G. Cardon,et al.  The effect of pedometer use in combination with cognitive and behavioral support materials to promote physical activity. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  A. Kasuya.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[4]  Graham Baker,et al.  Does physical activity counselling enhance the effects of a pedometer-based intervention over the long-term: 12-month findings from the Walking for Wellbeing in the west study , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[5]  D. French,et al.  What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. , 2010, British journal of health psychology.

[6]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  Lucas J Carr,et al.  Eight-month follow-up of physical activity and central adiposity: results from an Internet-delivered randomized control trial intervention. , 2009, Journal of physical activity & health.

[8]  Natasha Carraro,et al.  Spontaneous and experimentally induced action planning and coping planning for physical activity: A meta-analysis , 2013 .

[9]  Tom Loney,et al.  Does exercise motivation predict engagement in objectively assessed bouts of moderate-intensity exercise? A self-determination theory perspective. , 2008, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[10]  N. Mutrie,et al.  The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West" on physical activity levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[11]  Nanette Mutrie,et al.  Recruiting participants to walking intervention studies: a systematic review , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[12]  R. Ryan,et al.  Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[13]  Z. Tran,et al.  Walking, lipids, and lipoproteins: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[14]  David R Bassett,et al.  Increasing daily walking improves glucose tolerance in overweight women. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[15]  Jennifer L. Pomeranz,et al.  The Delivery of Public Health Interventions via the Internet: Actualizing Their Potential , 2011 .

[16]  Lucas J Carr,et al.  Internet-delivered behavior change program increases physical activity and improves cardiometabolic disease risk factors in sedentary adults: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[17]  B. Resnick,et al.  Testing the reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale. , 2000, Nursing research.

[18]  D. Markland,et al.  A Modification to the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire to Include an Assessment of Amotivation , 2004 .

[19]  D. Warburton,et al.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[20]  N. Mutrie,et al.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[22]  J. Tolstrup,et al.  A population-based randomized controlled trial of the effect of combining a pedometer with an intervention toolkit on physical activity among individuals with low levels of physical activity or fitness. , 2012, Preventive medicine.

[23]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). , 2001, JAMA.

[24]  Kristiann C Heesch,et al.  Experiences of Women in a Minimal Contact Pedometer-Based Intervention: A Qualitative Study , 2005, Women & health.

[25]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[26]  Ananda Sen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss , 2008, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[27]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[28]  M. Murphy,et al.  The effect of walking on fitness, fatness and resting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[29]  Catherine B. Chan,et al.  Participant experiences in a workplace pedometer-based physical activity program. , 2008, Journal of physical activity & health.

[30]  E. Leventhal,et al.  Self-regulation, health, and behavior: A perceptual-cognitive approach , 1998 .

[31]  J. Spence,et al.  How many steps/day are enough? for adults , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[32]  N. Cook,et al.  Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[33]  C. Richardson.  Objective monitoring and automated coaching: a powerful combination in physical activity interventions , 2010 .

[34]  D. French,et al.  What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour--and are they the same? , 2011, Health education research.

[35]  Takeshi Osonoi,et al.  Relationship between urinary sodium excretion and pioglitazone‐induced edema , 2010, Journal of diabetes investigation.

[36]  A. Booth,et al.  Evaluation of an interactive, Internet-based weight loss program: a pilot study. , 2008, Health education research.

[37]  S. Clemes,et al.  Increasing our understanding of reactivity to pedometers in adults. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[39]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  What makes people decide to visit and use an internet-delivered behavior-change intervention? A qualitative study among adults. , 2009 .

[40]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  A. Williams.  EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[42]  Roger Holder,et al.  The effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials. , 2015, Preventive medicine.

[43]  R. Dishman,et al.  Reliability and validity of expected outcomes and barriers for habitual physical activity. , 1989, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[44]  Boris P. Kovatchev,et al.  A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions , 2009, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[45]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[46]  M Hillsdon,et al.  A systematic review of physical activity promotion strategies. , 1996, British journal of sports medicine.

[47]  R J Shephard,et al.  Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). , 1992, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[48]  R. Shephard.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2008 .

[49]  P. O'Malley,et al.  Management of Dyslipidemia for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction: Synopsis of the 2014 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[50]  C. Shields,et al.  Social Support in Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Maintenance: Associations with Self‐Efficacy and Health‐Related Quality of Life , 2007 .

[51]  Caroline R Richardson,et al.  A randomized trial comparing structured and lifestyle goals in an internet-mediated walking program for people with type 2 diabetes , 2007, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[52]  Claire F Fitzsimons.  Scottish physical activity research collaboration , 2009 .

[53]  David Ogilvie,et al.  The 'Walking for Wellbeing in the West' randomised controlled trial of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with physical activity consultation with 12 month follow-up: rationale and study design , 2008, BMC public health.

[54]  Z. Tran,et al.  Walking and resting blood pressure in adults: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[55]  S. Blair,et al.  Physical activity for health: What kind? How much? How intense? On top of what? , 2011, Annual review of public health.

[56]  Jane,et al.  Behavior Change Techniques Used to Promote Walking and Cycling , 2013, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[57]  S. Michie,et al.  Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[58]  C. Abraham,et al.  Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[59]  Gregory M Dominick,et al.  Randomized controlled trial testing an internet physical activity intervention for sedentary adults. , 2013, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.