Psychometric functions of uncertain template matching observers

This theoretical note describes a simple equation that closely approximates the psychometric functions of template-matching observers with arbitrary levels of position and orientation uncertainty. We show that the approximation is accurate for detection of targets in white noise, 1/f noise, and natural backgrounds. In its simplest form, this equation, which we call the uncertain normal integral (UNI) function, has two parameters: one that varies only with the level of uncertainty and one that varies only with the other properties of the stimuli. The UNI function is useful for understanding and generating predictions of uncertain template matching (UTM) observers. For example, we use the UNI function to derive a closed-form expression for the detectability (d′) of UTM observers in 1/f noise, as a function of target amplitude, background contrast, and position uncertainty. As a descriptive function, the UNI function is just as flexible and simple as other common descriptive functions, such as the Weibull function, and it avoids some of their undesirable properties. In addition, the estimated parameters have a clear interpretation within the family of UTM observers. Thus, the UNI function may be the better default descriptive formula for psychometric functions in detection and discrimination tasks.

[1]  Quick Rf A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[2]  R. Quick A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection , 2004, Kybernetik.

[3]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.

[4]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. , 2008, Psychological review.

[5]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[6]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[7]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[8]  David Jaarsma,et al.  More on the Detection of One of M Orthogonal Signals , 1967 .

[9]  W. P. Tanner PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[11]  W. Geisler,et al.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research , 2011, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[13]  Melchi M. Michel,et al.  Intrinsic position uncertainty explains detection and localization performance in peripheral vision. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[14]  Marilyn L Shaw,et al.  Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  P F Judy,et al.  Detection of noisy visual targets: Models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[19]  W. Geisler,et al.  Constrained sampling experiments reveal principles of detection in natural scenes , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[21]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: Effects of spatial scale and retinal eccentricity , 1994, Vision Research.

[23]  M. Banks,et al.  Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision , 1987, Nature.