The effect of perceived indoor air quality on productivity loss

This theoretical study reports on the impact of perceived indoor air quality for productivity loss in air-conditioned office buildings. A new derivation of productivity calculation model based on pollution loads and contaminant removal effectiveness is applied and the effect of the improved ventilation efficiency on productivity is estimated. The findings show that the proportion dissatisfied is a good predictor of productivity loss due to indoor air quality in different kinds of office work. It is possible to calculate the proportion dissatisfied from olf and decipol units. Productivity is possible to improve by increasing outdoor airflow rate, decreasing emissions and improving ventilation efficiency e.g. with displacement ventilation. In a case of one person per 10 m 2 (0.1 olf/m2) and low-emitted material (0.1 olf/m 2), the total sensory pollution load is 0.2 olf/m 2. Normally, the minimum admissible outdoor airflow rate is 0.5–1.5 l/s per m 2 in office spaces. This means that 5–9% productivity loss should be accepted using the minimum airflow rate design method. With displacement ventilation, it is possible to improve indoor air quality in a manner that significantly increases productivity compared with traditional mixing system. The effect of the contaminant removal effectiveness on the productivity loss is about 0.5–2% between these systems using the same airflow rate. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  P. Fanger,et al.  The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. , 2000, Indoor air.

[2]  Pawel Wargocki,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY IS AFFECTED BY THE AIR QUALITY IN OFFICES , 2000 .

[3]  P. Fanger.  Introduction of the olf and the decipol units to quantify air pollution perceived by humans indoors and outdoors , 1988 .

[4]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Estimates of Improved Productivity and Health from Better Indoor Environments , 1997 .

[5]  Birgit Müller,et al.  Pollution from ducts: What is the reason, how to measure it and how to prevent it? , 2000 .

[6]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  European Indoor Air Quality Audit Project in 56 Office Buildings , 1996 .

[7]  P Wargocki,et al.  Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads. , 1999, Indoor air.

[8]  Shinichi Tanabe,et al.  INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON HUMAN OLFACTORY SENSATION , 1990 .

[9]  Woods Je.  Cost avoidance and productivity in owning and operating buildings. , 1989 .

[10]  E. Mayer,et al.  Sensory evaluation of the air in 14 office buildings: Part of an interdisciplinary SBS study in Germany , 1999 .

[11]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF IMPROVED AIR QUALITY IN AN OFFICE BUILDING , 2002 .

[12]  O. Valbjørn,et al.  Determination of exposure-response relationships for emissions from building products , 1998 .

[13]  A. H. Rosenfeld,et al.  Potential Nationwide Improvements in Productivity and Health From Better Indoor Environments , 1998 .

[14]  J. Woods.  Cost avoidance and productivity in owning and operating buildings. , 1989, Occupational medicine.

[15]  J. Eto,et al.  The HVAC costs of increased fresh air ventilation rates in office buildings , 1988 .