Relevance Sensitive Non-Monotonic Inference on Belief Sequences

We present a method for relevance sensitive non-monotonic inference from belief sequences which incorporates insights pertaining to prioritized inference and relevance sensitive, inconsistency tolerant belief revision. Our model uses a finite, logically open sequence of propositional formulas as a representation for beliefs and defines a notion of inference from maxiconsistent subsets of formulas guided by two orderings: a temporal sequencing and an ordering based on relevance relations between the putative conclusion and formulas in the sequence. The relevance relations are ternary (using context as a parameter) as opposed to standard binary axiomatizations. The inference operation thus defined easily handles iterated revision by maintaining a revision history, blocks the derivation of inconsistent answers from a possibly inconsistent sequence and maintains the distinction between explicit and implicit beliefs. In doing so, it provides a finitely presented formalism and a plausible model of reasoning for automated agents.

[1]  Konstantinos Georgatos Ju l 2 00 0 Ordering-based Representations of Rational Inference ∗ Konstantinos Georgatos , 2008 .

[2]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  Belief Revision and Rational Inference , 2002, ArXiv.

[3]  Norman Y. Foo,et al.  Changing conditional beliefs unconditionally , 1996 .

[4]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[5]  Odinaldo Teixeira Rodrigues A methodology for iterated information change , 1998 .

[6]  Judea Pearl,et al.  On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Andreas Herzig,et al.  Propositional Belief Base Update and Minimal Change , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Rohit Parikh,et al.  An Inconsistency Tolerant Model for Belief Representation and Belief Revision , 1999, IJCAI.

[9]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment , 1988, TARK.

[10]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Belief Revision: Syntax based approaches to belief revision , 1992 .

[11]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  Belief Revision, Revised , 1995, IJCAI.

[12]  R. Parikh Beliefs, belief revision, and splitting languages , 1999 .

[13]  Renata Wassermann Resource Bounded Belief Revision , 1999 .

[14]  Gerhard Brewka,et al.  Belief revision in a framework for default reasoning , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.

[15]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (Vol. 4): epistemic and temporal reasoning , 1995 .

[16]  Jon Doyle,et al.  A Truth Maintenance System , 1979, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Konstantinos Georgatos,et al.  Entrenchment Relations: A Uniform Approach to Nonmonotonicity , 1997, ECSQARU-FAPR.