Performance of Wavefront-Guided Soft Lenses in Three Keratoconus Subjects

Purpose. To examine whether custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses provide visual and optical performance equivalent to habitual gas permeable (GP) corrections in three keratoconus subjects. Methods. Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses were produced and evaluated at the Visual Optics Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston for three habitual GP-wearing keratoconus subjects. Photopic high and mesopic low contrast logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (logMAR VA) and residual second to tenth order optical aberrations experienced with these custom soft lenses were recorded and compared with the subjects’ habitual GP correction. Results. All three subjects wearing custom soft lenses reached the established exit criterion of photopic high contrast (HC) logMAR VA equal to or better than values recorded with their habitual GP lens. HC logMAR VA for GP and custom soft lens correction was 0.01 ± 0.05 and 0.00 ± 0.02 for KC1, 0.20 ± 0.02 and 0.14 ± 0.02 for KC2, and 0.04 ± 0.09 and −0.05 ± 0.05 for KC3, respectively. In addition, KC2 reached the exit criterion of high-order aberration levels equal to or less than values with their habitual GP lens (GP lens: 0.394 ± 0.024 &mgr;m, custom lens: 0.381 ± 0.074 &mgr;m). Conclusions. Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses have been demonstrated to provide equivalent photopic HC logMAR VA to that achieved with habitual GP correction in three keratoconus subjects. Future emphasis will be placed on surpassing habitual GP performance and reaching a normal age-matched criterion for both VA and aberration measures. Achieving these goals may require a more thorough understanding of the relationship between visual performance and residual aberration experienced during custom lens wear through the use of image quality metrics predictive of visual performance.

[1]  N. Château,et al.  Simulated Optical Performance of Custom Wavefront Soft Contact Lenses for Keratoconus , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  Raymond A Applegate,et al.  Making sense out of wavefront sensing. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  T T McMahon,et al.  Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Edwin J Sarver,et al.  Are all aberrations equal? , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  David R Williams,et al.  Method for optimizing the correction of the eye's higher-order aberrations in the presence of decentrations. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  David R Williams,et al.  Calculated impact of higher-order monochromatic aberrations on retinal image quality in a population of human eyes. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[8]  Katrina E. Parker,et al.  Uncorrected Wavefront Error and Visual Performance During RGP Wear in Keratoconus , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Jason D Marsack,et al.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  E. Sarver,et al.  Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  Kazuno Negishi,et al.  Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  L Carney,et al.  Masking of irregular corneal topography with contact lenses. , 1998, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[13]  D Williams,et al.  Visual benefit of correcting higher order aberrations of the eye. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[14]  Edwin J Sarver,et al.  Visual Acuity as a Function of Zernike Mode and Level of Root Mean Square Error , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Correcting anterior corneal aberration and variability of lens movements in keratoconic eyes with back-surface customized soft contact lenses. , 2007, Optics letters.

[16]  D Whitaker,et al.  Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Vision improvement by correcting higher-order aberrations with customized soft contact lenses in keratoconic eyes. , 2007, Optics letters.

[19]  D R Williams,et al.  Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye's higher-order aberrations. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  Norberto López-Gil,et al.  Aberration generation by contact lenses with aspheric and asymmetric surfaces. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[21]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of Retinal Image Quality Predict Visual Performance in Eyes With 20/17 or Better Visual Acuity , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  Takashi Fujikado,et al.  Magnitude and orientation of Zernike terms in patients with keratoconus. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[24]  Xu Cheng,et al.  Design Principles and Limitations of Wave-Front Guided Contact Lenses , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[25]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Applying wavefront sensors and corneal topography to keratoconus. , 2002, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.