The Researched Opinions on Research: Disabled people and disability research

Thirty-five disabled people with a range of physical, sensory and mental impairments were interviewed about (1) their experiences of research; (2) their general opinions concerning research; (3) whether they thought research had served/was serving disabled people well; (4) how research on disability should be conducted; (5) who should conduct research on disability; and, finally, (6) what they would like to be researched. In this paper, the results of aspects two to five are reported. It was found that the opinions of disabled people mirror quite strongly the recent arguments forwarded by disabled academics concerning the need for emancipatory and empowering research strategies. In particular, the respondents articulated a need for inclusive, action-based research strategies, where disabled people are involved as consultants and partners not just as research subjects, There were few arguments, however, for an exclusive approach, where disability research would be conducted solely by researchers who were themselves disabled.

[1]  Paul Routledge,et al.  The Third Space as Critical Engagement , 1996 .

[2]  M. Oliver,et al.  Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future , 1997 .

[3]  M. El-den,et al.  Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1993 .

[4]  Ruth E. Butler.  Geography and Vision-Impaired and Blind Populations , 1994 .

[5]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Conducting Research in Human Geography: theory, methodology and practice , 1999 .

[6]  R. Golledge.  Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations , 1993 .

[7]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Ableist Geographies, Disablist Spaces: Towards a Reconstruction of Golledge's 'Geography and the Disabled' , 1996 .

[8]  V. Chouinard.  Reinventing Radical Geography: Is All That's Left Right? , 1994 .

[9]  C. Barnes,et al.  Breaking the Mould ? An introduction to doing disability research , 2002 .

[10]  Michael Oliver,et al.  The Politics of Disablement , 1990 .

[11]  P. Sample.  Beginnings: Participatory action research and adults with developmental disabilities , 1996 .

[12]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal , 1993 .

[13]  T. Shakespeare.  Rules of Engagement: Doing disability research , 1996 .

[14]  B. Gleeson,et al.  A Geography for Disabled People , 1996 .

[15]  E. Stone,et al.  Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. , 1996, The British journal of sociology.

[16]  M. Oliver.  Changing the Social Relations of Research Production , 1992 .

[17]  Kristi Johansen,et al.  Teaching to Transgress , 1997 .

[18]  Colin Barnes,et al.  Qualitative Research: Valuable or Irrelevant? , 1992 .

[19]  Paul Abberley.  Counting Us Out: A Discussion of the OPCS Disability Surveys , 1992 .

[20]  I. Dey.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[21]  Michael Preston-Shoot,et al.  Whose Project is it Anyway? Sharing and shaping the research and development agenda , 1996 .

[22]  P. Beresford,et al.  It's our problem too ! Challenging the exclusion of poor people from poverty discourse , 1995 .

[23]  P. Beresford,et al.  Psychiatric System Survivors and Emancipatory research : Issues , overlaps and differences , 2002 .

[24]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Disability, Access to Education, and Future Opportunities , 1998 .

[25]  C. Katz,et al.  All the World is Staged: Intellectuals and the Projects of Ethnography , 1992 .