Carlomat, Version 2 of the Program for Automatic Computation of Lowest Order Cross Sections

Abstract Version 2 of carlomat , a program for automatic computation of the lowest order cross sections of multiparticle reactions, is described. The substantial modifications with respect to version 1 of the program include: generation of a single phase space parameterization for the Feynman diagrams of the same topology, an interface to parton density functions, improvement of the color matrix computation, the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa mixing in the quark sector, the effective models including scalar electrodynamics, the W t b interaction with operators of dimension up to 5 and a general top–Higgs coupling. Moreover, some minor modifications have been made and several bugs in the program have been corrected. Program summary Program title: carlomat, version 2.0 Catalogue identifier: AEDQ_v2_0 Program summary URL: http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEDQ_v2_0.html Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 49058 No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 25748755 Distribution format: tar.gz Programming language: Fortran 90/95 Computer: All Operating system: Linux Classification: 4.4, 11.2 Catalogue identifier of previous version: AEDQ_v1_0 Journal reference of previous version: Comput. Phys. Comm. 180 (2009) 1671 Does the new version supersede the previous version?: Yes Nature of problem: Leading order predictions for reactions of two particle scattering into a final state with up to 10 particles within the Standard Model and some effective models. Solution method: As in version 1 of the program, the matrix element in the helicity basis and multichannel Monte Carlo phase space integration routine are generated automatically for a user specified process. The color matrix is divided into smaller routines and written down as a stand alone program that is calculated prior to compilation and execution of the Monte Carlo program for computation of the cross section. The phase space integration routine is substantially shortened in order to speed up its compilation. The code generation part of the program is modified to incorporate the scalar electrodynamics and effective Lagrangians of the top quark interactions with the W and Higgs bosons. Routines necessary for computing the helicity amplitudes of new couplings are added. Reasons for new version: The main reasons for the revision are: 1. To adjust the program for the description of hadron collisions. 2. To facilitate computation of the color matrix that is usually much more involved for processes of the hadron–hadron collision than for processes of electron–positron annihilation. 3. To shorten compilation time of the generated kinematical routines. 4. To implement some extensions of the standard model in the program. Summary of revisions: A few substantial modifications are introduced with respect to version 1.0 of the program. First, a single phase space parameterization is generated for the Feynman diagrams of the same topology taking into account possible differences in mappings of peaks in the individual diagrams, which speeds up a compilation time of the Monte Carlo program for multiparticle reactions by a factor 4–5 with respect to the previous version. Second, an interface to parton density functions is added that allows predictions to be made for hadron collisions. Third, calculation of the color matrix is facilitated. Fourth, the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa mixing in the quark sector is implemented. Fifth, the effective models including scalar electrodynamics, the W t b interaction with operators of dimension up to 5 and a general top–Higgs coupling are implemented. Moreover, some minor modifications have been made and several bugs in the program have been corrected. Restrictions: Although the compilation time has been shortened in the current version, it still may be quite long for processes with 8 or more final state particles. Another limitation is the size of the color matrix that, if too big, may prevent compilation or result in a very long execution time of the color compilation program. This actually may happen already for some QCD processes with 7 partons such as g g → 5 g , the commutation time of the color matrix of which, is about 200 h. Running time: Depends strongly on the selected process and, to a lesser extent, on the Fortran compiler used. The following amounts of time are needed at different computation stages of the top quark pair production parton level process g g → b u d b μ − ν μ , to produce the appended test output files on a PC with the Pentium 4 3.0 GHz processor with Absoft (GNU, Intel) Fortran compilers: code generation takes 3.7 s (3.7 s, 2.4 s), compilation, computation and simplification of the color matrix takes about 1 s (1 s, 1 s), compilation of all the generated routines takes just a few seconds and execution of the Monte Carlo program takes about 44 s (41 s, 23 s).

[1]  K. Abe Particle physics experiments at JLC , 2001 .

[2]  TESLA Technical Design Report Part III: Physics at an e+e- Linear Collider , 2001, hep-ph/0106315.

[3]  M. Davier,et al.  ANOMALOUS MAGNETIC MOMENT OF THE MUON , 2008 .

[4]  W. Kilian,et al.  WHIZARD—simulating multi-particle processes at LHC and ILC , 2007, 0708.4233.

[5]  A. Sherstnev,et al.  CompHEP 4.4 - Automatic Computations from Lagrangians to Events , 2004, hep-ph/0403113.

[6]  Mikhail Dubinin,et al.  CompHEP - a package for evaluation of Feynman diagrams and integration over multi-particle phase space. User's manual for version 33 , 1999 .

[7]  Karol Kolodziej carlomat: A program for automatic computation of lowest order cross sections , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[8]  Yuan,et al.  Using the top quark for testing standard-model polarization and CP predictions. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[9]  Ryszard S. Romaniuk,et al.  Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , 2012 .

[10]  T. Stelzer,et al.  Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes , 1994, hep-ph/9401258.

[11]  K. Kołodziej Anomalous Wtb Coupling at the LHC , 2012, 1212.6733.

[12]  K. Kołodziej An anomalous Wtb coupling at a linear collider , 2003, hep-ph/0312168.

[13]  Predictions for all processes e + e - → fermions + γ , 1999, hep-ph/9904472.

[14]  A. Denner,et al.  Feyn Arts ― computer-algebraic generation of Feynman graphs and amplitudes , 1990 .

[15]  Thorsten Ohl,et al.  O’Mega: An optimizing matrix element generator , 2000, hep-ph/0102195.

[16]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  GRACE at ONE-LOOP: Automatic calculation of 1-loop diagrams in the electroweak theory with gauge parameter independence checks , 2003, hep-ph/0308080.

[17]  Michal Czakon,et al.  Helac-nlo , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[18]  Costas G. Papadopoulos,et al.  PHEGAS : A phase-space generator for automatic cross-section computation , 2000, hep-ph/0007335.

[19]  J. Huston,et al.  New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis , 2002, hep-ph/0201195.

[20]  R. Pittau,et al.  ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions , 2002, hep-ph/0206293.

[21]  Alan D. Martin,et al.  Review of Particle Physics (RPP) , 2012 .

[22]  T. Hahn,et al.  Generating Feynman Diagrams and Amplitudes with FeynArts 3 , 2001 .

[23]  T. Gleisberg,et al.  Comix, a new matrix element generator , 2008, 0808.3674.

[24]  Yoshimitsu Shimizu,et al.  Numerical calculation of Feynman amplitudes for electroweak theories and an application to e+e−→W+W−γ , 1991 .

[25]  F. Siegert,et al.  Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 , 2008, 0811.4622.

[26]  J. T. Childers,et al.  Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , 2012 .

[27]  Aggeliki Kanaki,et al.  HELAC: A package to compute electroweak helicity amplitudes , 2000, hep-ph/0002082.

[28]  F. Maltoni,et al.  MadGraph 5: going beyond , 2011, 1106.0522.

[29]  J. Winter,et al.  SHERPA 1., a proof-of-concept version , 2003 .

[30]  et al,et al.  ILC Reference Design Report Volume 1 - Executive Summary , 2007, 0712.1950.

[31]  P. Zerwas,et al.  SECONDARY REACTIONS IN ELECTRON-POSITRON (ELECTRON) COLLISIONS* , 1975 .

[32]  K. Kołodziej Secondary lepton distributions as a probe of the top-Higgs coupling at the LHC , 2013, 1303.4962.

[33]  Alessandro Cafarella,et al.  Helac-Phegas: A generator for all parton level processes , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[34]  J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra A minimal set of top-Higgs anomalous couplings , 2009, 0904.2387.

[35]  A. Martin,et al.  Parton distributions for the LHC , 2009, 0901.0002.

[36]  Alexander Belyaev,et al.  CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[37]  Yoshimitsu Shimizu,et al.  Automatic Computation of Cross Sections in HEP , 2000 .

[38]  K. Kołodziej Anomalous Wtb coupling and forward–backward asymmetry of top quark production at the Tevatron , 2011, 1110.2103.

[39]  T. Hahn,et al.  Automatic loop calculations with FeynArts, FormCalc, and LoopTools , 2000 .

[40]  F. Maltoni,et al.  MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph , 2002, hep-ph/0208156.