A postponement model to determine the customisation degree applied to the notebook computer industry

Facing an increasingly intense and competitive environment, the information industry must design a global service chain for its self-development and also to make its global development more efficient. The application of the postponement concept has become an efficient method to help enterprises reach this goal. With the aim of building and analysing a postponement structure from the viewpoint of added value and demand uncertainty, this study constructed a multi-objective postponement model. The model was then analysed, using three quantifying objects: the overall cost, product types and the average assembly time; and two decision variables: the variety of parts and inventory quantity. In an indeterminate function, both the application demanding frequency and demanded quantity submit to a Poisson distribution and Normal distribution. Considering the profit model, the manufacturer can decide on the most suitable degree of customisation according to market situations, suppliers at the time of production and most important, the manufacturer's profit. This study uses a notebook computer manufacturer as an example to carry out empirical analysis. The manufacturer was permitted to decide the optimal product types depending on its financial status. Postponement techniques were then provided as a reference to the manufacturer to help it maximise profits.

[1]  Rajiv M. Dewan,et al.  Adoption of Internet-Based Product Customization and Pricing Strategies , 2000 .

[2]  M. Fisher What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[3]  R. C. Baker,et al.  A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  D. Gerwin Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective , 1993 .

[5]  Bart Victor,et al.  New Competitive Strategies: Challenges to Organizations and Information Technology , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[6]  S. Ruzika,et al.  Approximation Methods in Multiobjective Programming , 2005 .

[7]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Mass Customization at Hewlett-Packard : The Power of Postponement , 1999 .

[8]  Hokey Min,et al.  Supply chain modeling: past, present and future , 2002 .

[9]  Chris J. Backhouse,et al.  Management of uncertainty through postponement , 2004 .

[10]  N. D. Burns,et al.  Implications of postponement for the supply chain , 2003 .

[11]  Hon-Shiang Lau,et al.  Effects of a demand-curve's shape on the optimal solutions of a multi-echelon inventory/pricing model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Patrik Jonsson,et al.  LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2022 .

[13]  Samar K. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Optimal return policy and modular design for build-to-order products , 2005 .

[14]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design , 2000 .

[15]  S. Chopra,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning & Operation , 2007 .

[16]  Eddie Anderson,et al.  Operations Management—Strategy and Analysis , 1987 .

[17]  Grace I. Kunz,et al.  Individual differences, motivations, and willingness to use a mass customization option for fashion products , 2004 .

[18]  J. Winch,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation , 2003 .

[19]  Ben Hua,et al.  Supply chain optimization of continuous process industries with sustainability considerations , 2000 .

[20]  A. Volgenant,et al.  Operations management: Strategy and analysis , 1988 .

[21]  Yen-Fang Chu,et al.  A STUDY OF INVENTORY MODEL BASED ON ORDER QUANTITY AND LEAD TIME AS DECISION VARIABLES—DEMAND FREQUENCY AND QUANTITIES CORRESPONDING POISSON AND NORMAL DISTRIBUTION , 2004 .