From Transit Systems to Models: Purpose of Modelling

From Part I of the book, it will be obvious that public transport plays an essential role in providing mobility to people, especially in dense urban areas. The social welfare generated by good public transport comes at a price, however. Almost all forms require large investments into infrastructure, vehicles and operation. With limited finance, ideal public transport remains a distant goal, and a lot of effort goes into finding an optimal allocation of budget to investment options. The key question for these decisions is: How big is the total benefit of a proposed investment? To answer it, one needs to predict how the potential users will make use of the hypothetical improved public transport. For responsible decision-making, this prediction should be rational, transparent and accountable. It is no surprise therefore that models are typically used to produce the predictions. These models span the whole range of mobility decisions made by individuals, from long term to short term. Passenger route choice, the focus of Part III, accounts for only a part of the complex decision hierarchy. Before zooming into route choice models, this chapter looks at the planning process as a whole, explains the role of models in decision-making and gives an overview of the whole decision hierarchy. The last two sections introduce the general mathematical framework, in which decision models are formulated and set the stage for the description of specific models.

[1]  R. Jou,et al.  An application of cumulative prospect theory to freeway drivers’ route choice behaviours , 2013 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[4]  E. Martins,et al.  An algorithm for the ranking of shortest paths , 1993 .

[5]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Multi Criteria Decision Making and the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[6]  C. Chu A PAIRED COMBINATORIAL LOGIT MODEL FOR TRAVEL DEMAND ANALYSIS , 1989 .

[7]  Sebastián Raveau,et al.  Analyzing route choice strategies on transit networks , 2014 .

[8]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting. , 1980 .

[9]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  Using prospect theory to investigate the low value of travel time for small time changes , 2011 .

[10]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[11]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[12]  Richard Bellman,et al.  ON A ROUTING PROBLEM , 1958 .

[13]  Chieh-Hua Wen Alternative tree structures for estimating nested logit models with mixed preference data , 2010 .

[14]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[15]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[16]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[17]  E. Avineri Nudging Travellers to Make Better Choices , 2009 .

[18]  T de la Barra,et al.  Multidimensional path search and assignment , 1993 .

[19]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception , 2005 .

[20]  M. Meyer,et al.  Urban transportation planning , 1984 .

[21]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[22]  Peter Vovsha,et al.  Application of Cross-Nested Logit Model to Mode Choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area , 1997 .

[23]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[24]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis , 1990 .

[25]  E. Cascetta,et al.  A MODIFIED LOGIT ROUTE CHOICE MODEL OVERCOMING PATH OVERLAPPING PROBLEMS. SPECIFICATION AND SOME CALIBRATION RESULTS FOR INTERURBAN NETWORKS , 1996 .

[26]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods , 2001 .

[27]  Subeh Chowdhury,et al.  Modelling public-transport users’ behaviour at connection point , 2013 .

[28]  M. Postorino A comparative analysis of different specifications of modal choice models in an urban area , 1993 .

[29]  J. Y. Yen Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network , 1971 .

[30]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Empirical approaches to combining revealed and stated preference data: Some recent developments with reference to urban mode choice , 2008 .

[31]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Modelling Transport: Ortúzar/Modelling Transport , 2011 .

[32]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[33]  Jing Zhou,et al.  A decision-making rule for modeling travelers' route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory , 2011 .

[34]  M. Gaudry,et al.  Dogit and Logit Models of Travel Mode Choice in Montreal , 1980 .

[35]  S. Hoogendoorn,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review: Developments in Utility Theory, Prospect Theory and Regret Theory to Investigate Travellers' Behaviour in Situations Involving Travel Time Uncertainty , 2014 .

[36]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Model of Change , 1986 .

[37]  H. Timmermans On the (Ir)relevance of Prospect Theory in Modelling Uncertainty in Travel Decisions , 2010 .

[38]  S. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Modelling travellers' heterogeneous route choice behaviour as prospect maximizers , 2013 .

[39]  E. Ziegel Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1989 .

[40]  Sebastián Raveau,et al.  Inclusion of latent variables in Mixed Logit models: Modelling and forecasting , 2010 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[42]  A. Garnham,et al.  Thinking and Reasoning , 1994 .

[43]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  Applying Branch-and-Bound Technique to Route Choice Set Generation , 2006 .

[44]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[45]  Nicos Christofides,et al.  An efficient implementation of an algorithm for finding K shortest simple paths , 1999, Networks.

[46]  Kathryn E. Newcomer,et al.  Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation , 2010 .

[47]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  An algorithm for the equilibrium assignment problem with random link times , 1982, Networks.

[48]  Erel Avineri,et al.  A Cumulative Prospect Theory Approach to Passengers Behavior Modeling: Waiting Time Paradox Revisited , 2004, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[49]  A. Papola Some development on the cross-nested logit model , 2004 .

[50]  F. Koppelman,et al.  Alternative nested logit models: structure, properties and estimation , 1998 .

[51]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[52]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks: A prospect theory approach , 2010 .

[53]  J. Baron Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[54]  C. Bhat Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model , 2001 .

[55]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  Using prospect theory to investigate the low marginal value of travel time for small time changes , 2012 .

[56]  Marc Gaudry,et al.  Heteroscedasticity and the use of Box–Cox transformations☆ , 1979 .

[57]  Paolo Beria,et al.  Multicriteria versus Cost Benefit Analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility , 2012 .

[58]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[59]  E. J. V. D. Kaa Prospect Theory and Choice Behaviour Strategies: Review and Synthesis of Concepts from Social and Transport sciences , 2010 .

[60]  Richard Pavley,et al.  A Method for the Solution of the Nth Best Path Problem , 1959, JACM.

[61]  Nicholas Kalouptsidis,et al.  Approximations of choice probabilities in mixed logit models , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[62]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  Investigation of Stochastic Network Loading Procedures , 1998 .