How does the toad's visual system discriminate different worm-like stimuli?

Behavioral experiments show that toads exhibit stimulus- and locus-specific habituation. Different worm-like stimuli that toads can discriminate at a certain visual location form a dishabituation hierarchy. What is the neural mechanism which underlies these behaviors? This paper proposes that the toad discriminates visual objects based on temporal responses, and that discrimination is reflected in different average neuronal firing rates at some higher visual center, hypothetically anterior thalamus. This theory is developed through a large-scale neural simulation which includes retina, tectum and anterior thalamus. The neural model based on this theory predicts that retinal R2 cells play a primary role in the discrimination via tectal small pear cells (SP) and R3 cells refine the feature analysis by inhibition. The simulation demonstrates that the retinal response to the trailing edge of a stimulus is as crucial for pattern discrimination as the response to the leading edge. The new dishabituation hierarchies predicted by this model by reversing contrast and shrinking stimulus size need to be tested experimentally.

[1]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Neurophysiology of the Anuran Visual System , 1976 .

[2]  J.-P. Ewert,et al.  Neuroethology: Toward a Functional Analysis of Stimulus-Response Mediating and Modulating Neural Circuitries , 1987 .

[3]  M. Arbib,et al.  A neural model of interactions subserving prey-predator discrimination and size preference in anuran amphibia. , 1985, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  J. Ewert Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: Prey-catching in toads , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  J. Ewert,et al.  Movement-sensitive neurones in the toad's retina , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  M. Arbib,et al.  A model of anuran retina relating interneurons to ganglion cell responses , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[8]  B. Betts The T5 Base Modulator Hypothesis: A Dynamic Model of T5 Neuron Function in Toads , 1989 .

[9]  G. Roth,et al.  Mathematical model and simulation of retina and tectum opticum of lower vertebrates , 1987, Acta biotheoretica.

[10]  J. Ewert,et al.  Excitatory effects following habituation of prey-catching activity in frogs and toads. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[11]  J. L. Teeters,et al.  A simulation system and model for the Anuran Retina , 1990 .

[12]  R. Northcutt,et al.  Connections of the bullfrog striatum: Afferent organization , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  M. Arbib,et al.  The role of the tectal column in facilitation of amphibian prey- catching behavior: a neural model , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Ewert Tectal Mechanisms That Underlie Prey-Catching and Avoidance Behaviors in Toads , 1984 .

[15]  J. Ewert,et al.  Neurobiologie und System-Theorie eines visuellen Muster-Erkennungsmechanismus bei Kröten , 2004, Kybernetik.

[16]  K. Gregory,et al.  Retinofugal projections in the frog: location of the postsynaptic neurons. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[17]  J. Ewert,et al.  Neuroethological Analysis of the Innate Releasing Mechanism for Prey-Catching Behavior in Toads , 1983 .

[18]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of the orienting reflex , 1975 .

[19]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Northcutt,et al.  Nuclear organization of the bullfrog diencephalon , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  J. Ewert,et al.  Edge preference of retinal and tectal neurons in common toads (Bufo bufo) in response to worm-like moving stripes: the question of behaviorally relevant ‘position indicators’ , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  M. Arbib,et al.  A model of the neural mechanisms responsible for pattern recognition and stimulus specific habituation in toads , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  J. Ewert 5 – The Visual System of the Toad: Behavioral and Physiological Studies on a Pattern Recognition System , 1976 .

[24]  W. F. Blair,et al.  The Amphibian visual system : a multidisciplinary approach , 1976 .

[25]  W von Seelen,et al.  [Neurobiology and system theory of a visual pattern recognition mechanism in the toad]. , 1973, Kybernetik.

[26]  E. Kandel,et al.  Prospectuses of Neurobiology. (Book Reviews: From Neuron to Brain. A Cellular Approach to the Function of the Nervous System; The Cellular Basis of Behavior. An Introduction to Behavioral Neurobiology) , 1976 .

[27]  G. Lázár,et al.  Morphology and location of tectal projection neurons in frogs: A study with hrp and cobalt‐filling , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  D. Ingle Some effects of pretectum lesions on the frogs' detection of stationary objects , 1980, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  J. -P. Ewert,et al.  Configurational prey-selection by individual experience in the toadBufo bufo , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[30]  R. Desimone,et al.  Inferior Temporal Cortex and Pattern Recognition , 1985 .

[31]  G. Székely,et al.  Cellular and Synaptic Architecture of the Optic Tectum , 1976 .