Global Modelling: Managing Uncertainty Complexity and Incomplete Information

Human activities change the environment on a global level. Global modelling is used to derive insights in the interactions between humans and the ir environment. However, the possibility to validate those global models is limited. In fact, t oo little information is available, many subjective assumptions are made and a single model cannot cover all relevant scale levels and processes. These limitations already appeared in th e early seventies. Current global modelling activities still deal with the same dilemma’s, ofte n in the same way as the strongly criticised world models of the early seventies. We sketch some rec nt developments which can help to manage the persistent dilemma’s. We focus on the us e of different modelling paradigms and on the use of different world views to analyse the con sequences of subjective assumptions to be made in global models. keywords global modelling, validation, complexity, uncertain ty

[1]  J. Rotmans,et al.  Allocation of fossil CO2 emission rights quantifying cultural perspectives , 1995 .

[2]  R. Kaufmann,et al.  ASSESSING THE DICE MODEL: UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH THE EMISSION AND RETENTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES , 1997 .

[3]  Michael E. Colby Environmental management in development: the evolution of paradigms , 1991 .

[4]  Vladimir F. Krapivin Mathematical model for global ecological investigations , 1993 .

[5]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[6]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Models of doom : a critique of The limits to growth , 1976 .

[7]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[8]  L. Codispoti The limits to growth , 1997, Nature.

[9]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Image: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect , 1990 .

[10]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  A model framework for integrated studies of the climate problem , 1993 .

[11]  M. Janssen Optimization of a non-linear dynamical system for global climate change , 1997 .

[12]  Thomas S. Fiddaman,et al.  Feedback complexity in integrated climate-economy models , 1997 .

[13]  Hubertus Johannes Maria de Vries,et al.  Sustainable resource use. An enquiry into modelling and planning. , 1989 .

[14]  B. Lloyd Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology and social choice , 1991 .

[15]  Marco A. Janssen Modelling Global Change: the Art of Integrated Assessment Modelling , 1998 .

[16]  W. Nordhaus World Dynamics: Measurement Without Data , 1973 .

[17]  StroustrupBjarne A history of C , 1993 .

[18]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate change 1995 - impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change : scientific-technical analyses , 1997 .

[19]  J. Alcamo,et al.  The RAINS Model of Acidification: Science and Strategies in Europe , 1990 .

[20]  Anand Patwardhan,et al.  Assessing integrated assessments , 1996 .

[21]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[22]  Peter Brecke Integrated Global Models That Run On Personal Computers , 1993, Simul..

[23]  W. Nordhaus An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases , 1992, Science.

[24]  Marcus Janssen,et al.  The battle of perspectives: a multi-agent model with adaptive responses to climate change , 1998 .

[25]  C. Price Emissions, concentrations and disappearing CO2 , 1995 .

[26]  S. Rayner A Cultural Perspective On the Structure and Implementation of Global Environmental Agreements , 1991 .

[27]  C. Hope,et al.  Policy analysis of the greenhouse effect: An application of the PAGE model , 1993 .

[28]  W. Nordhaus Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change , 1994 .