Legislating for corporate criminal liability in Finland: 22-year long debate revisited

Abstract The criminal liability of corporations has been the subject of long debates in many countries. This article scrutinizes the 22-year long genesis of corporate criminal liability legislation in Finland. We are interested in unveiling the turns of the law-making process, and in investigating the struggle between various interest groups from a socio-historical perspective. The research data consist of legislative documents such as committee memorandums and written opinions, and the method of inquiry is content analysis. Our study reveals that the core issue of the process became whether jurisprudential principles should be changed in accordance with societal change or whether they are essentially immutable. The Act of Corporate Criminal Liability took effect in 1995, but its coverage was weakened by imposing discretionary sentencing and leaving employment offences outside of its purview. The initial aim and the very justification of the law—to place liability where it belongs—was achieved only in principle. Furthermore, the final outcome of the 1995 law served to actually prevent corporate misconducts from being processed as crimes.

[1]  S. Tombs,et al.  The Corporate Criminal: Why Corporations Must Be Abolished , 2015 .

[2]  D. Machin,et al.  Corporate crime and the discursive deletion of responsibility: A case study of the Paddington rail crash , 2013 .

[3]  Liisa Lähteenmäki.  Keskusteluja vuokratyöstä. Vuokratyön diskursiivinen rakentuminen Suomessa , 2013 .

[4]  S. Tombs.  Still killing with impunity: corporate criminal law reform in the UK , 2013 .

[5]  P. Larsson.  Regulating Corporate Crime: From Punishment to Self-Regulation , 2012 .

[6]  A. Pascal,et al.  European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability , 2011 .

[7]  Sara Sun Beale.  A Response to the Critics of Corporate Criminal Liability , 2009 .

[8]  Anne Alvesalo.  The Dynamics of Economic Crime Control , 2008 .

[9]  D. Whyte,et al.  Eyes wide shut: the police investigation of safety crimes , 2007 .

[10]  Garry C. Gray,et al.  The Regulation of Corporate Violations Punishment, Compliance, and the Blurring of Responsibility , 2006 .

[11]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[12]  Steve Tombs,et al.  Regulating Workplace Safety: Systems and Sanctions , 2002 .

[13]  S. Tombs,et al.  The Emergence of a “War” on Economic Crime: The Case of Finland , 2001, Business and Politics.

[14]  Hazel Croall.  Understanding White Collar Crime , 2001 .

[15]  Laureen Snider.  The Sociology of Corporate Crime: An Obituary , 2000 .

[16]  Richard Johnstone,et al.  Regulating Workplace Safety: System and Sanctions , 1999 .

[17]  F. Cullen,et al.  Combating Corporate Crime: Local Prosecutors at Work , 1998 .

[18]  J. Dimento,et al.  4. Should We Prosecute Corporations and/or Individuals? , 1995 .

[19]  Celia Wells,et al.  Corporations and criminal responsibility , 1995 .

[20]  Kitty Calavita,et al.  Corporate crime and criminal justice system capacity: Government response to financial institution fraud , 1994 .

[21]  M. Levi.  Regulating Fraud: White Collar Crime and the Criminal Process , 1994 .

[22]  G. Stessens.  Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Perspective , 1994, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[23]  Keith Hawkins,et al.  COMPLIANCE STRATEGY, PROSECUTION POLICY, AND AUNT SALLY A Comment on Pearce and Tombs , 1990 .

[24]  Steve Tombs,et al.  IDEOLOGY, HEGEMONY, AND EMPIRICISM Compliance Theories of Regulation , 1990 .

[25]  R. Mawby.  Regulating Fraud: White-Collar Crime and the Criminal Process , 1989 .

[26]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field , 1987 .

[27]  S. Tombs,et al.  Crime, harm and corporate power , 2009 .

[28]  Hazel Croall.  Victims of White-Collar and Corporate Crime , 2007 .

[29]  David O. Friedrichs.  Trusted Criminals... White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society , 2004 .

[30]  T. Turner.  Combating Corporate Crime , 2004 .

[31]  Robert A. Kagan,et al.  The “Criminology of the Corporation” and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies , 1980 .

[32]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .

[33]  T. Graham.  The Common Law: Vicarious Liability and the Development of Primary Liability UNLESS THE TERMS OF THE STATUTE INVOLVED SPECIFICALLY PROVIDE TO the , 2022 .