Modularity of stress response evolution

Responses to extracellular stress directly confer survival fitness by means of complex regulatory networks. Despite their complexity, the networks must be evolvable because of changing ecological and environmental pressures. Although the regulatory networks underlying stress responses are characterized extensively, their mechanism of evolution remains poorly understood. Here, we examine the evolution of three candidate stress response networks (chemotaxis, competence for DNA uptake, and endospore formation) by analyzing their phylogenetic distribution across several hundred diverse bacterial and archaeal lineages. We report that genes in the chemotaxis and sporulation networks group into well defined evolutionary modules with distinct functions, phenotypes, and substitution rates as compared with control sets of randomly chosen genes. The evolutionary modules vary in both number and cohesiveness among the three pathways. Chemotaxis has five coherent modules whose distribution among species shows a clear pattern of interdependence and rewiring. Sporulation, by contrast, is nearly monolithic and seems to be inherited vertically, with three weak modules constituting early and late stages of the pathway. Competence does not seem to exhibit well defined modules either at or below the pathway level. Many of the detected modules are better understood in engineering terms than in protein functional terms, as we demonstrate using a control-based ontology that classifies gene function according to roles such as “sensor,” “regulator,” and “actuator.” Moreover, we show that combinations of the modules predict phenotype, yet surprisingly do not necessarily correlate with phylogenetic inheritance. The architectures of these three pathways are therefore emblematic of different modes and constraints on evolution.

[1]  Ali S. Hadi,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Chster Analysis , 1991 .

[2]  A. Dautry‐Varsat,et al.  Type III secretion system in Chlamydia species: identified members and candidates. , 2000, Microbes and infection.

[3]  Adam P. Arkin,et al.  Orthologous Transcription Factors in Bacteria Have Different Functions and Regulate Different Genes , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Simple sequence repeats in proteins and their significance for network evolution. , 2005, Gene.

[5]  Sarah A Teichmann,et al.  Novel specificities emerge by stepwise duplication of functional modules. , 2005, Genome research.

[6]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[7]  D. Dubnau,et al.  DNA uptake in bacteria. , 1999, Annual review of microbiology.

[8]  W. Fontana,et al.  Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. , 2000, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[9]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Erich Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Convergent evolution of gene networks by single‐gene duplications in higher eukaryotes , 2004, EMBO reports.

[11]  A. E. Tsong,et al.  Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic , 2006, Nature.

[12]  A. Kimura,et al.  Chromosomal gradient of histone acetylation established by Sas2p and Sir2p functions as a shield against gene silencing , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[13]  P. Bork,et al.  Identification and analysis of evolutionarily cohesive functional modules in protein networks. , 2006, Genome research.

[14]  Darren A. Natale,et al.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[15]  T. Msadek When the going gets tough: survival strategies and environmental signaling networks in Bacillus subtilis. , 1999, Trends in microbiology.

[16]  A. Grossman Genetic networks controlling the initiation of sporulation and the development of genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis. , 1995, Annual review of genetics.

[17]  R. Losick,et al.  Bacillus subtilis and Its Closest Relatives , 2002 .

[18]  Adam P. Arkin,et al.  The Evolution of Two-Component Systems in Bacteria Reveals Different Strategies for Niche Adaptation , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  U. Alon,et al.  Environmental variability and modularity of bacterial metabolic networks , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  J. Hoch,et al.  Evolution of signalling in the sporulation phosphorelay , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[22]  Michelle G. Giglio,et al.  TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties: tools for the assignment of molecular function and biological process in prokaryotic genomes , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Yaniv Ziv,et al.  Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[24]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  Allen G. Rodrigo,et al.  Computational and Evolutionary Analysis of HIV Molecular Sequences , 2001, Springer US.

[27]  Ken F. Jarrell,et al.  Archaeal Flagella, Bacterial Flagella and Type IV Pili: A Comparison of Genes and Posttranslational Modifications , 2006, Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[28]  B. Snel,et al.  The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. L. Martínez Do bacteria have sex? , 1991, Nature.

[30]  D. Thieffry,et al.  Modularity in development and evolution. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[31]  L. Altucci,et al.  Tumor-selective action of HDAC inhibitors involves TRAIL induction in acute myeloid leukemia cells , 2005, Nature Medicine.

[32]  A. Kostyukova,et al.  The archaeal flagellum: a unique motility structure , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Design and Diversity in Bacterial Chemotaxis: A Comparative Study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2004, PLoS biology.

[34]  Igor B Zhulin,et al.  Comparative genomic and protein sequence analyses of a complex system controlling bacterial chemotaxis. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[35]  R. Kolter,et al.  DNA as a Nutrient: Novel Role for Bacterial Competence Gene Homologs , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  D. Lipman,et al.  A genomic perspective on protein families. , 1997, Science.

[37]  J. Claverys,et al.  Competence‐induced fratricide in streptococci , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[38]  Jiajian Liu,et al.  A Molecular Switch Controlling Competence and Motility: Competence Regulatory Factors ComS, MecA, and ComK Control ςD-Dependent Gene Expression in Bacillus subtilis , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[39]  N. Slonim,et al.  Ab initio genotype–phenotype association reveals intrinsic modularity in genetic networks , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[40]  Berend Snel,et al.  Gene co-regulation is highly conserved in the evolution of eukaryotes and prokaryotes. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  S. Tasker,et al.  Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology , 2010 .

[42]  P Bork,et al.  On the Classification and Evolution of Protein Modules , 1997, Journal of protein chemistry.

[43]  Francis D. Gibbons,et al.  Judging the quality of gene expression-based clustering methods using gene annotation. , 2002, Genome research.

[44]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[45]  G. Church,et al.  Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[46]  Peer Bork,et al.  Systematic Association of Genes to Phenotypes by Genome and Literature Mining , 2005, PLoS biology.

[47]  B. Korber HIV Sequence Sigmatires and Similarities , 2002 .