The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendants' Evaluations of Their Courtroom Experience

The purpose of this study is to explore the role of perceived injustice in generating dissatisfaction with legal authorities. Using data collected in interviews with a sample of defendants in traffic and misdemeanor court, I compare the influence of case outcomes upon attitudes toward judges and courts to that of distributive and procedural justice. The results suggest that among the defendants studied the major determinant of satisfaction with legal authorities is perceived fairness. Once the influence of perceived fairness is considered, case outcomes explain no additional variation in attitudes toward courts and judges. In the conclusion, possible implications of this finding are discussed.

[1]  J. Brigham,et al.  Policy implementation : penalties or incentives? , 1982 .

[2]  A. Kahn,et al.  The Justice Process: Deciding Upon Equity or Equality , 1982 .

[3]  T. Tyler,et al.  The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. , 1981 .

[4]  M. Laver.  The politics of private desires , 1981 .

[5]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction With Citizen-Police Encounters , 1980 .

[6]  Mitchell A. Seligson,et al.  Trust, Efficacy and Modes of Political Participation: A Study of Costa Rican Peasants , 1980, British Journal of Political Science.

[7]  Social Psychology and the Emergence of Disputes , 1980 .

[8]  R. Hayden,et al.  Questions of Validity and Drawing Conclusions from Simulation Studies in Procedural Justice: A Comment , 1980 .

[9]  Austin Sarat,et al.  The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . . , 1980 .

[10]  John Thibaut,et al.  The Relation between Procedural and Distributive Justice , 1979 .

[11]  E. Muller.  Aggressive Political Participation , 1979 .

[12]  Ralph Baker,et al.  EVALUATION OF POLICE SERVICES IN MEDIUM-SIZED CITIES , 1979 .

[13]  P. Brickman,et al.  Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Effects of reward value and retaliative power on allocation decisions: Justice, generosity, or greed? , 1978 .

[15]  Jonathan D. Casper.  HAVING THEIR DAY IN COURT: DEFENDANT EVALUATIONS OF THE FAIRNESS OF THEIR TREATMENT , 1978 .

[16]  J. Traupmann,et al.  Equity: Theory and Research , 1978 .

[17]  T. O. Jukam,et al.  On the Meaning of Political Support , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Austin Sarat,et al.  Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence , 1977 .

[19]  W. Ophuls.  Ecology and the politics of scarcity , 1977 .

[20]  R. Curtin.  Income equity among U.S. workers: The bases and consequences of deprivation , 1977 .

[21]  G. Becker,et al.  The Economic Approach to Human Behavior , 1978 .

[22]  H. Reis,et al.  On Mediating Equity, Equality, and Self-Interest: The Role of Self-Presentation in Social Exchange. , 1976 .

[23]  Stuart A. Scheingold,et al.  The Politics of Rights , 1976 .

[24]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[25]  E. Lawler,et al.  Endorsement of formal leaders: an integrative model. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Bureaucratic Encounters: A Pilot Study in the Evaluation of Government Services , 1975 .

[27]  Arthur H. Miller,et al.  Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970 , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[28]  J. Citrin,et al.  Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[29]  George L. Kelling,et al.  The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment : a technical report , 1974 .

[30]  J. Tanenhaus,et al.  Public evaluations of constitutional courts, alternative explanations , 1973 .

[31]  R. Engstrom,et al.  Expectations and Images: A Note on Diffuse Support for Legal Institutions , 1972 .

[32]  I. Lane,et al.  Distribution of Insufficient, Sufficient, and Oversufficient Rewards: A Clarification of Equity Theory. , 1972 .

[33]  John C. Wahlke.  Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented , 1971, British Journal of Political Science.

[34]  D. Campbell,et al.  Hedonic relativism and planning the good society , 1971 .

[35]  H. Jacob,et al.  Debtors in court : the consumption of Government services , 1970 .

[36]  Michael J. Shapiro.  Rational Political Man: A Synthesis of Economic and Social-Psychological Perspectives , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[37]  H. Kelman.  Patterns of personal involvement in the national system: A social-psychological analysis of political legitimacy , 1969 .

[38]  W. Gamson.  Power and discontent , 1969 .

[39]  J. Tanenhaus,et al.  Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes , 1968 .

[40]  Murray Edelman,et al.  The symbolic uses of politics , 1967 .

[41]  D. Easton,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Political Life , 1966 .

[42]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[43]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[44]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  ON THE CONCEPT OF INFLUENCE , 1963 .

[45]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .