The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization

We examined the time-course of the influence of background knowledge on perceptual categorization by manipulating the meaningfulness of labels associated with categories and by manipulating the amount of time provided to subjects for making a categorization decision. Extending a paradigm originally reported by Wisniewski and Medin (1994) (Cog. Sci. 18 (1994) 221), subjects learned two categories of children's drawings that were given either meaningless labels (drawings by children from 'group 1' or 'group 2') or meaningful labels (drawings by 'creative' or 'non-creative' children); the meaningfulness of the label had a significant effect on how new drawings were classified. In addition, half of the subjects were provided unlimited time to respond, while the other half of the subjects were forced to respond quickly; speeded response conditions had a relatively large effect on categorization decisions by subjects given the meaningless labels but had relatively little effect on categorization decisions by subjects given the meaningful labels. These results suggest that some forms of background knowledge can show an influence at relatively early stages in the time-course of a categorization decision.

[1]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[2]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .

[3]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  A rule-plus-exception model for classifying objects in continuous-dimension spaces , 1998 .

[5]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Feature correlations in conceptual representations , 1989 .

[7]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[8]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[9]  Douglas L Medin,et al.  Linear separability and concept learning: Context, relational properties, and concept naturalness , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  R M Nosofsky,et al.  Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[13]  P. Farnsworth,et al.  Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity , 1964 .

[14]  M. Pazzani.  Influence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results. , 1991 .

[15]  T. Palmeri.  Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  E Heit.  Influences of prior knowledge on selective weighting of category members. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  Advances in cognitive science: Vol. 2: Theory and applications : Guy Tiberghien (ed.), Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, 1989. 204 pp., £39.95 , 1990 .

[18]  E. Heit,et al.  Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[20]  Influences of prior knowledge on selective weighting of category members. , 1998 .

[21]  Emilie L. Lin,et al.  Effects of Background Knowledge on Object Categorization and Part Detection , 1997 .

[22]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Similarity- versus rule-based categorization , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[23]  E. Wisniewski,et al.  Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[25]  D. Homa.  On the Nature of Categories , 1984 .

[26]  Elizabeth Munsterberg Koppitz,et al.  Psychological Evaluation of Human Figure Drawings by Middle School Pupils , 1984 .

[27]  Koen Lamberts,et al.  The time course of categorization. , 1998 .

[28]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  On the Interaction of Theory and Data in Concept Learning , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Nancy S. Kim,et al.  The causal status effect in categorization: An overview , 2000 .