Using online discussion boards with large and small groups to enhance learning of assistive technology

There is a need for further research to understand the potential uses of asynchronous electronic discussions in higher education courses. Electronic discussion boards were conducted with two different graduate speech-language pathology student cohorts to supplement in-class instruction regarding assistive technology. One year’s discussions were done as a single large group while the second year’s were done in multiple-small groups. These discussion boards were analyzed for emerging themes. Students’ opinions of the discussion board, along with their suggestions for improvement, were also requested and analyzed. Results indicated that the discussion boards were a successful tool in maximizing the potential for knowledge acquisition outside the classroom and that several enhancements could be added to improve the overall experience. In particular, instructor involvement was more easily incorporated into large groups and small groups had fewer students reporting about redundancy of posts. Practical applications and future research directions are discussed.

[1]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[2]  Tisha Bender,et al.  Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice and Assessment , 2003 .

[3]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Online and traditional assessments: what is the difference? , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  Cliff Figallo,et al.  Hosting Web Communities: Building Relationships, Increasing Customer Loyalty, and Maintaining A Competitive Edge , 1998 .

[6]  Leslie A. Moller Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education , 1998 .

[7]  Scott L. Althaus Please Scroll down for Article Communication Education Computer-mediated Communication in the University Classroom: an Experiment with On-line Discussions , 2022 .

[8]  J. Aitken,et al.  Using Electronic Discussion to Teach Communication Courses , 2002 .

[9]  Jennifer H. Waldeck,et al.  Teacher e-mail message strategies and students' willingness to communicate online , 2001 .

[10]  Seugnet Blignaut,et al.  Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments - an exploratory investigation , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication technology learning part 1: Augmentative and Alternative Communication intervention specialists , 2002 .

[13]  Tal Lebel,et al.  Teaching teachers about augmentative and alternative communication: Opportunities and challenges of a web-based course , 2005 .

[14]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[15]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  Scott L. Howell,et al.  Online Assessment and Measurement: Case Studies from Higher Education, K-12 and Corporate , 2006 .

[17]  Janice C Light,et al.  ‘Getting your wheel in the door’: successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2002 .

[18]  Jo Davies,et al.  Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication technology learning part 2: preprofessional students , 2002 .

[20]  Steven Smith,et al.  Increasing Access to Teacher Preparation: The Effectiveness of Traditional Instructional Methods in an Online Learning Environment , 2000 .

[21]  Stevie Rocco Online Assessment and Evaluation , 2007 .

[22]  David B Resnik Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[23]  Leah E. Wickersham,et al.  A Content Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills as an Indicator of Quality of Online Discussion in Virtual Learning Communities , 2006 .

[24]  Margaret Mazzolini,et al.  Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums , 2004 .