Autonomous Boolean modelling of developmental gene regulatory networks

During early embryonic development, a network of regulatory interactions among genes dynamically determines a pattern of differentiated tissues. We show that important timing information associated with the interactions can be faithfully represented in autonomous Boolean models in which binary variables representing expression levels are updated in continuous time, and that such models can provide a direct insight into features that are difficult to extract from ordinary differential equation (ODE) models. As an application, we model the experimentally well-studied network controlling fly body segmentation. The Boolean model successfully generates the patterns formed in normal and genetically perturbed fly embryos, permits the derivation of constraints on the time delay parameters, clarifies the logic associated with different ODE parameter sets and provides a platform for studying connectivity and robustness in parameter space. By elucidating the role of regulatory time delays in pattern formation, the results suggest new types of experimental measurements in early embryonic development.

[1]  J. Hooper.  Distinct pathways for autocrine and paracrine Wingless signalling inDrosophila embryos , 1994, Nature.

[2]  Cyrille Alexandre,et al.  Requirements for transcriptional repression and activation by Engrailed in Drosophila embryos , 2003, Development.

[3]  T. Tabata,et al.  The Drosophila hedgehog gene is expressed specifically in posterior compartment cells and is a target of engrailed regulation. , 1992, Genes & development.

[4]  E. Davidson.  The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks In Development And Evolution , 2006 .

[5]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[6]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[7]  James Sharpe,et al.  An atlas of gene regulatory networks reveals multiple three-gene mechanisms for interpreting morphogen gradients , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[8]  Daniel J. Gauthier,et al.  On the origin of chaos in autonomous Boolean networks , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  R. Thomas,et al.  Boolean formalization of genetic control circuits. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  P. Ingham,et al.  Regulation of wingless transcription in the Drosophila embryo. , 1993, Development.

[12]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The making of a maggot: patterning the Drosophila embryonic epidermis. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[13]  M. Ghil,et al.  Boolean delay equations: A simple way of looking at complex systems , 2006, nlin/0612047.

[14]  T. Kornberg,et al.  Analysis of cubitus interruptus regulation in Drosophila embryos and imaginal disks. , 1995, Development.

[15]  T. Kornberg,et al.  Ci: a complex transducer of the hedgehog signal. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  Volkan Sevim,et al.  Reliability of Transcriptional Cycles and the Yeast Cell-Cycle Oscillator , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Alexander Bockmayr,et al.  Incorporating Time Delays into the Logical Analysis of Gene Regulatory Networks , 2006, CMSB.

[18]  T. Kornberg,et al.  Proteolysis That Is Inhibited by Hedgehog Targets Cubitus interruptus Protein to the Nucleus and Converts It to a Repressor , 1997, Cell.

[19]  W. Gehring,et al.  Localized expression of sloppy paired protein maintains the polarity of Drosophila parasegments. , 1994, Genes & development.

[20]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  L. Glass.  Classification of biological networks by their qualitative dynamics. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  D. Thieffry,et al.  Segmenting the fly embryo: logical analysis of the role of the segment polarity cross-regulatory module. , 2008, The International journal of developmental biology.

[23]  T. Misteli,et al.  Transcription dynamics. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[24]  William J. R. Longabaugh,et al.  Computational representation of developmental genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[25]  V. Hatini,et al.  Distinct signals generate repeating striped pattern in the embryonic parasegment. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[26]  A. Galston.  Plant Physiology , 1967, Nature.

[27]  Michael B. Mayhew,et al.  Cyclin-dependent kinases are regulators and effectors of oscillations driven by a transcription factor network. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[28]  Nicholas T Ingolia,et al.  Topology and Robustness in the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network , 2004, PLoS biology.

[29]  Jean-Paul Vincent,et al.  The state of engrailed expression is not clonally transmitted during early Drosophila development , 1992, Cell.

[30]  Joshua E. S. Socolar,et al.  Global control of cell-cycle transcription by coupled CDK and network oscillators , 2008, Nature.

[31]  Didier Lime,et al.  Hybrid Modelling and Dynamical Analysis of Gene Regulatory Networks with Delays , 2007, Complexus.

[32]  J. Neel.  A Study of a Case of High Mutation Rate in Drosophila Melanogaster. , 1942, Genetics.

[33]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Zheng Gao,et al.  Boolean chaos. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.