A high-performance brain–computer interface

Recent studies have demonstrated that monkeys and humans can use signals from the brain to guide computer cursors. Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) may one day assist patients suffering from neurological injury or disease, but relatively low system performance remains a major obstacle. In fact, the speed and accuracy with which keys can be selected using BCIs is still far lower than for systems relying on eye movements. This is true whether BCIs use recordings from populations of individual neurons using invasive electrode techniques or electroencephalogram recordings using less- or non-invasive techniques. Here we present the design and demonstration, using electrode arrays implanted in monkey dorsal premotor cortex, of a manyfold higher performance BCI than previously reported. These results indicate that a fast and accurate key selection system, capable of operating with a range of keyboard sizes, is possible (up to 6.5 bits per second, or ∼15 words per minute, with 96 electrodes). The highest information throughput is achieved with unprecedentedly brief neural recordings, even as recording quality degrades over time. These performance results and their implications for system design should substantially increase the clinical viability of BCIs in humans.

[1]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  B.M. Yu,et al.  Improving neural prosthetic system performance by combining plan and peri-movement activity , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[4]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Covariation of primate dorsal premotor cell activity with direction and amplitude during a memorized-delay reaching task. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Neural Variability in Premotor Cortex Provides a Signature of Motor Preparation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Halgren,et al.  Motor-cortical activity in tetraplegics , 2001, Nature.

[7]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[8]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Modest gaze-related discharge modulation in monkey dorsal premotor cortex during a reaching task performed with free fixation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[10]  John F. Kalaska,et al.  Neural correlates of mental rehearsal in dorsal premotor cortex , 2004, Nature.

[11]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Prior information in motor and premotor cortex: activity during the delay period and effect on pre-movement activity. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Extracting Dynamical Structure Embedded in Neural Activity , 2005, NIPS.

[13]  D.M. Taylor,et al.  Information conveyed through brain-control: cursor versus robot , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  R. Andersen,et al.  Neural prosthetic control signals from plan activity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[15]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Deciding not to GO: neuronal correlates of response selection in a GO/NOGO task in primate premotor and parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  P R Kennedy,et al.  Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  Parag G. Patil,et al.  Ensemble Recordings Of Human Subcortical Neurons as a Source Of Motor Control Signals For a Brain-Machine Interface , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[19]  S.I. Ryu,et al.  An extensible infrastructure for fully automated spike sorting during online experiments , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Modulation of preparatory neuronal activity in dorsal premotor cortex due to stimulus-response compatibility. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[22]  R. Andersen,et al.  Cognitive Control Signals for Neural Prosthetics , 2004, Science.

[23]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Simultaneous encoding of multiple potential reach directions in dorsal premotor cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[26]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Latent variable models for neural data analysis , 1999 .

[27]  S. Meagher Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .