Comparison of the performance behaviour of silica sand and olivine in a dual fluidised bed reactor system for steam gasification of biomass at pilot plant scale.

The behaviour of olivine compared to silica sand as bed material was investigated in a dual fluidised bed reactor system (DFB) for steam gasification of biomass. This study presents fundamental experimental data on the impact of olivine on the product gas and distribution of condensable hydrocarbons (tars) effected by the catalytic properties of olivine. The results obtained with olivine are compared to silica sand, which is taken as a reference as it is considered to be inert. The experimental device is a pilot plant of 100 kW fuel input and the design is comparable to large scale applications. Pressure and temperature profiles of the reactor system are presented to illustrate the system performance. A clear shift was found for the product gas composition (H2: 5 percentage points in volume, CO and CO2: up to 10 percentage points in volume) using silica sand and olivine as bed material. Olivine is identified as increasing the product gas yield and the H2 yield by promoting the CO-shift reaction. It was found that olivine reduced the GC/MS detectable tar content by approx. 35% and the content of gravimetrically detected tars by approx. 60% in the product gas. The changes in tar yield (related to the fuel input) were found to be decreased by about 30% and 57% for GC/MS and grav. detectable tars, respectively. Classifications for condensable hydrocarbons proposed in literature are used to lump the detected tar species into appropriate groups. Thus, the behaviour and shifting of the tar with respect to the classification is identified. In particular, naphthalene was found to contribute notably to the GC/MS tar complex at quantities of 40–45 wt.% (olivine) and 31–33 wt.% (silica sand). In contrast to silica sand, olivine has a decomposition effect on the higher hydrocarbons.

[1]  D. Świerczyński,et al.  Steam reforming of tar from a biomass gasification process over Ni/olivine catalyst using toluene as a model compound , 2007 .

[2]  S. Rapagnà Steam-gasification of biomass in a fluidised-bed of olivine particles. , 2000 .

[3]  A. M. Efstathiou,et al.  A comparative study of the steam reforming of phenol towards H2 production over natural calcite, dolomite and olivine materials , 2010 .

[4]  José Corella,et al.  Olivine or Dolomite as In-Bed Additive in Biomass Gasification with Air in a Fluidized Bed: Which Is Better? , 2004 .

[5]  R. Chirone,et al.  Biomass gasification in a catalytic fluidized reactor with beds of different materials , 2009 .

[6]  D. Geldart Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[7]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  Development and Application of a Simulation Tool for Biomass Gasification Based Processes , 2008 .

[8]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Reactive bed materials for improved biomass gasification in a circulating fluidised bed reactor , 2008 .

[9]  K. Magrini-Bair,et al.  Review of Catalytic Conditioning of Biomass-Derived Syngas , 2009 .

[10]  D. Świerczyński,et al.  Oxidation Reduction Behavior of Iron-Bearing Olivines (FexMg1-x)2SiO4 Used as Catalysts for Biomass Gasification , 2006 .

[11]  L. Devi Catalytic removal of biomass tars : olivine as prospective in-bed catalyst for fluidized-bed biomass gasifiers , 2005 .

[12]  Larry G. Felix,et al.  Olivine catalysts for methane- and tar-steam reforming , 2008 .

[13]  B. Kelleher,et al.  Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification , 2001 .

[14]  Thomas Nussbaumer,et al.  Mechanisms and kinetics of homogeneous secondary reactions of tar from continuous pyrolysis of wood chips , 2002 .

[15]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  In Situ CO2 Capture in a Dual Fluidized Bed Biomass Steam Gasifier – Bed Material and Fuel Variation , 2009 .

[16]  Gerrit Brem,et al.  Experimental comparison of biomass chars with other catalysts for tar reduction , 2008 .

[17]  B. J. Vreugdenhil,et al.  THE 800 KWTH ALLOTHERMAL BIOMASS GASIFIER MILENA , 2008 .

[18]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  Steam gasification of various feedstocks at a dual fluidised bed gasifier: Impacts of operation conditions and bed materials , 2011 .

[19]  H. Hofbauer,et al.  Tar content and composition in producer gas of fluidized bed gasification of wood—Influence of temperature and pressure , 2009 .

[20]  B. Morreale,et al.  High-Temperature Kinetics of the Homogeneous Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction , 2004 .

[21]  Luciana Lisi,et al.  Dual bed reactor for the study of catalytic biomass tars conversion , 2010 .

[22]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Olivine as tar removal catalyst for biomass gasifiers: Catalyst characterization , 2005 .

[23]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  The FICFB — Gasification Process , 1997 .

[24]  Anthony V. Bridgwater,et al.  Developments in thermochemical biomass conversion , 1997 .

[25]  Hofbauer Hermann,et al.  Biomass CHP Plant Güssing - A Success Story , 2002 .

[26]  Heejoon Kim,et al.  The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: An overview , 2008 .

[27]  C. Rhodes,et al.  Water-gas shift reaction: finding the mechanistic boundary , 1995 .

[28]  Robert M. Enick,et al.  Uncatalyzed and wall‐catalyzed forward water–gas shift reaction kinetics , 2005 .

[29]  T. A. Milne,et al.  Biomass Gasifier "Tars": Their Nature, Formation, and Conversion , 1998 .

[30]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  In-Bed Catalytic Tar Reduction in a Dual Fluidized Bed Biomass Steam Gasifier , 2004 .