PeptideWitch–A Software Package to Produce High-Stringency Proteomics Data Visualizations from Label-Free Shotgun Proteomics Data

PeptideWitch is a python-based web module that introduces several key graphical and technical improvements to the Scrappy software platform, which is designed for label-free quantitative shotgun proteomics analysis using normalised spectral abundance factors. The program inputs are low stringency protein identification lists output from peptide-to-spectrum matching search engines for ‘control’ and ‘treated’ samples. Through a combination of spectral count summation and inner joins, PeptideWitch processes low stringency data, and outputs high stringency data that are suitable for downstream quantitation. Data quality metrics are generated, and a series of statistical analyses and graphical representations are presented, aimed at defining and presenting the difference between the two sample proteomes.

[1]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  ABRF Proteome Informatics Research Group (iPRG) 2015 Study: Detection of Differentially Abundant Proteins in Label-Free Quantitative LC-MS/MS Experiments. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  Anup D Shah,et al.  LFQ-Analyst: An easy-to-use interactive web-platform to analyze and visualize label-free proteomics data preprocessed with MaxQuant. , 2020, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  E. Lacey,et al.  Data from a proteomic baseline study of Assemblage A in Giardia duodenalis , 2015, Data in brief.

[4]  A. Fennell,et al.  Protein identification and quantification from riverbank grape, Vitis riparia: Comparing SDS‐PAGE and FASP‐GPF techniques for shotgun proteomic analysis , 2015, Proteomics.

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[6]  Dana Pascovici,et al.  Label-free quantitative shotgun proteomics using normalized spectral abundance factors. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[7]  H. Francis,et al.  Proteomic analysis of the dorsal and ventral hippocampus of rats maintained on a high fat and refined sugar diet , 2013, Proteomics.

[8]  E. Lacey,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of Giardia duodenalis assemblage A: A baseline for host, assemblage, and isolate variation , 2015, Proteomics.

[9]  S. Sluyter,et al.  Proteomic analysis in Giardia duodenalis yields insights into strain virulence and antigenic variation , 2014, Proteomics.

[10]  K. Resing,et al.  Comparison of Label-free Methods for Quantifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  Dana Pascovici,et al.  Differential regulation of aquaporins, small GTPases and V‐ATPases proteins in rice leaves subjected to drought stress and recovery , 2012, Proteomics.

[12]  A. Goodchild,et al.  Quantitative shotgun proteomics reveals extensive changes to the proteome of the orbitofrontal cortex in rats that are hyperactive following withdrawal from a high sugar diet , 2016, Proteomics.

[13]  M. Washburn,et al.  Improving label-free quantitative proteomics strategies by distributing shared peptides and stabilizing variance. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  S. Lange,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  Paul A. Haynes,et al.  An experimentally-derived measure of inter-replicate variation in reference samples: the same-same permutation methodology , 2019, bioRxiv.

[16]  Michael K. Coleman,et al.  Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  A. Fennell,et al.  Shotgun proteomic analysis of photoperiod regulated dormancy induction in grapevine. , 2018, Journal of proteomics.

[18]  D. Raftos,et al.  Quantitative proteomics of heavy metal stress responses in Sydney rock oysters , 2012, Proteomics.

[19]  M. Washburn,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Jian Zhang,et al.  PANDA-view: an easy-to-use tool for statistical analysis and visualization of quantitative proteomics data , 2018, Bioinform..

[21]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Julie L. Wilson,et al.  Comparing the Diagnostic Classification Accuracy of iTRAQ, Peak-Area, Spectral-Counting, and emPAI Methods for Relative Quantification in Expression Proteomics. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[23]  E. Lacey,et al.  The generation gap: Proteome changes and strain variation during encystation in Giardia duodenalis. , 2015, Molecular and biochemical parasitology.

[24]  Mehdi Mirzaei,et al.  Less label, more free: Approaches in label‐free quantitative mass spectrometry , 2011, Proteomics.

[25]  Linfeng Wu,et al.  Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics , 2010, Expert review of proteomics.

[26]  D. Raftos,et al.  Potential protein biomarkers of QX disease resistance in selectively bred Sydney Rock Oysters , 2018, Aquaculture.

[27]  H. Baharvand,et al.  Proteome Analysis of Ground State Pluripotency , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Dana Pascovici,et al.  Multiple testing corrections in quantitative proteomics: A useful but blunt tool , 2016, Proteomics.

[29]  J. Chick,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of two different rice varieties reveals that drought tolerance is correlated with reduced abundance of photosynthetic machinery and increased abundance of ClpD1 protease. , 2016, Journal of proteomics.

[30]  Michael R Shortreed,et al.  Enhanced Global Post-translational Modification Discovery with MetaMorpheus. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[31]  Robertson Craig,et al.  TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. , 2004, Bioinformatics.

[32]  E. Yi,et al.  Refinements of LC-MS/MS Spectral Counting Statistics Improve Quantification of Low Abundance Proteins , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Marie Locard-Paulet,et al.  Comparing 22 popular phosphoproteomics pipelines for peptide identification and site localization. , 2020, Journal of proteome research.