An Automated Two-step Pipeline for Aggressive Prostate Lesion Detection from Multi-parametric MR Sequence.

A substantial percentage of prostate cancer cases are overdiagnosed and overtreated due to the challenge in deter- mining aggressiveness. Multi-parametric MR is a powerful imaging technique to capture distinct characteristics of prostate lesions that are informative for aggressiveness assessment. However, manual interpretation requires a high level of expertise, is time-consuming, and significant inter-observer variation exists for radiologists. We propose a completely automated approach to assessing pixel-level aggressiveness of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI. Our model efficiently combines traditional computer vision and deep learning algorithms, to remove reliance on manual features, prostate segmentation, and prior lesion detection and identified optimal combinations of MR pulse sequences for assessment. Using ADC and DWI, our proposed model achieves ROC-AUC of 0.86 and ROC-AUC of 0.88 for the diagnosis of aggressive and non-aggressive prostate lesions, respectively. In performing pixel-level clas- sification, our model's classifications are easily interpretable and allow clinicians to infer localized analyses of the lesion.

[1]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Iterative Most-Likely Point Registration (IMLP): A Robust Algorithm for Computing Optimal Shape Alignment , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[3]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[4]  M. Stasi,et al.  Texture features on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: new potential biomarkers for prostate cancer aggressiveness , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer in MRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Point-Based Rigid-Body Registration Using an Unscented Kalman Filter , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  John D. Austin,et al.  Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations , 1987 .

[8]  Bulat Ibragimov,et al.  Prostate cancer classification with multiparametric MRI transfer learning model , 2019, Medical physics.

[9]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: An update on state‐of‐the‐art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  J. Hornaday,et al.  Cancer Facts & Figures 2004 , 2004 .

[11]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Computerized Multiparametric MR image Analysis for Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness-Assessment , 2016, ArXiv.

[12]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  M. Vural,et al.  Final Gleason Score Prediction Using Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine Based on Preoperative Multiparametric MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer at 3T , 2014, BioMed research international.

[14]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Kernel-Based Learning From Both Qualitative and Quantitative Labels: Application to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Based on Multiparametric MR Imaging , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[17]  Karen E. Burtt,et al.  Computer Aided-Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI: A Technical Review of Current Research , 2014, BioMed research international.

[18]  Joseph O. Deasy,et al.  Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.