Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory—Exploring effects of task features
暂无分享,去创建一个
Avi Hofstein | Per Morten Kind | Avi Hofstein | P. Kind | Vanessa Kind | Vanessa Kind | Janine Wilson | Janine Wilson
[1] Gail Richmond,et al. Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small‐group discourse and scientific knowledge building , 1996 .
[2] Ian Abrahams,et al. Does Practical Work Really Work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science , 2008 .
[3] R. A. Engle,et al. Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .
[4] Heekyong Kim,et al. The Features of Peer Argumentation in Middle School Students' Scientific Inquiry , 2006 .
[5] Elizabeth Hegarty-Hazel. The Student laboratory and the science curriculum , 1990 .
[6] J. Osborne,et al. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .
[7] Robin Millar,et al. Investigating in the school science laboratory: conceptual and procedural knowledge and their influence on performance , 1994 .
[8] D. Kuhn. Thinking as Argument , 1992 .
[9] D. Klahr,et al. Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[10] Clark A. Chinn,et al. Children's Responses to Anomalous Scientific Data: How Is Conceptual Change Impeded?. , 2002 .
[11] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education , 2005 .
[12] Derek Hodson,et al. Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards A More Critical Approach To Practical Work In School Science , 1993 .
[13] Stuart Naylor,et al. Argumentation and Primary Science , 2007 .
[14] Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al. Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1999 .
[15] W. Sandoval,et al. Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .
[16] C. Chinn,et al. Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .
[17] J. Osborne,et al. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .
[18] Vincent N. Lunetta,et al. The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .
[19] María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. Designing Argumentation Learning Environments , 2007 .
[20] Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al. The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Conscription Device and Tool for Social Thinking in High School Science. , 1992 .
[21] R. Duschl,et al. "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .
[22] Michael Ford,et al. Disciplinary Authority and Accountability in Scientific Practice and Learning , 2008 .
[23] Shirley Simon,et al. Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom , 2006 .
[24] Paul J. Germann,et al. Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry , 1996 .
[25] James D. Klein,et al. The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction , 1995 .
[26] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality , 2008 .
[27] Randy Yerrick,et al. Lower track science students' argumentation and open inquiry instruction , 2000 .
[28] Uri Zoller,et al. The disposition toward critical thinking of high school and university science students: an interintra Israeli-Italian Study , 2000 .
[29] William A. Sandoval,et al. What Can Argumentation Tell Us About Epistemology , 2007 .
[30] Derek Hodson,et al. Practical work in school science: exploring some directions for change , 1996 .
[31] Learning about the Nature of Scientific Knowledge: The Imitating-Science Project , 2005 .
[32] Shirley Simon,et al. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .
[33] S. Erduran,et al. Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview , 2007 .
[34] Wolff-Michael Roth,et al. The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Device and Tool Thinking in High Conscription for Social School Science , 1992 .
[35] S. Erduran,et al. TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .
[36] T. Kuhn,et al. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .
[37] Brian Hand,et al. Factors Affecting the Implementation of Argument in the Elementary Science Classroom. A Longitudinal Case Study , 2009 .
[38] Julian Swain,et al. Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries , 2004 .
[39] Abbie Brown,et al. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .
[40] Laurence Simonneaux. Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis , 2001 .
[41] B. Koslowski. Theory and Evidence: The Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1996 .
[42] Patrick Fullick. Investigations by Order: Policy, curriculum and science teachers' work under the Education Reform Act , 1997 .
[43] Andy Cavagnetto,et al. Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy , 2010 .
[44] Anat Zohar,et al. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .
[45] Roger C. Schank,et al. SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .
[46] Sonja M. Mork. Argumentation in science lessons: Focusing on the teacher’s role , 2012 .
[47] Sibel Erduran,et al. Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research , 2007 .
[48] M. Baker,et al. Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific Notions , 2002 .
[49] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .
[50] Avi Hofstein,et al. Learning In and From Science Laboratories , 2012 .
[51] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions , 2008 .
[52] Gregory J. Kelly,et al. Inquiry, Activity and Epistemic Practice , 2008 .
[53] Sibel Erduran,et al. Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms , 2007 .
[54] L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al. Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .
[55] J. Lemke. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .
[56] Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al. Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments , 2013 .
[57] Jazlin Ebenezer,et al. Chemistry students' conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography , 1996 .
[58] B. Lazerick. Third international mathematics and science study , 1997 .
[59] F. Toates,et al. Science in Schools , 1878, Nature.