Where's Downtown?: Behavioral Methods for Determining Referents of Vague Spatial Queries

Humans think and talk about regions and spatial relations imprecisely, in terms of vague concepts that are fuzzy or probabilistic (e.g., downtown, near). The functionality of geographic information systems will be increased if they can interpret vague queries. We discuss traditional and newer approaches to defining and modeling spatial queries. Most of the research on vague concepts in information systems has focussed on mathematical and computational implementation. To complement this, we discuss behavioral-science methods for determining the referents of vague spatial terms, particularly vague regions. We present a study of the empirical determination of downtown Santa Barbara. We conclude with a discussion of prospects and problems for integrating vague concepts into geographic information systems.

[1]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Modeling Directional Knowledge and Reasoning in Environmental Space: Testing Qualitative Metrics , 1996 .

[2]  Gary L. Allen,et al.  From Knowledge to Words to Wayfinding: Issues in the Production and Comprehension of Route Directions , 1997, COSIT.

[3]  Fangju Wang,et al.  Fuzzy Representation of Geographical Boundaries in GIS , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Ontologies in support of activities in geographical space , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Michael Blakemore,et al.  Part 4: Mathematical, Algorithmic and Data Structure Issues: Generalisation and Error in Spatial Data Bases , 1984 .

[6]  S. Lavin.  Mapping Continuous Geographical Distributions Using Dot-Density Shading , 1986 .

[7]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms , 1986 .

[8]  Fangju Wang.  Towards a Natural Language User Interface: An Approach of Fuzzy Query , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Terence R. Smith.  A Digital Library for Geographically Referenced Material , 1996, Computer.

[10]  Wolfgang Wahlster,et al.  One word says more than a thousand pictures , 1989 .

[11]  D. Mark,et al.  The Nature Of Boundaries On ‘Area-Class’ Maps , 1989 .

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[13]  Gudula Retz-Schmidt,et al.  Various Views on Spatial Prepositions , 1988, AI Mag..

[14]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Dimitris Papadias,et al.  Processing fuzzy spatial queries: a configuration similarity approach , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Frederick E. Petry,et al.  Special Issue on Incorporating Fuzzy Sets in Geographic Information Systems , 2003, Trans. GIS.

[17]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Regions in Geography , 2003, Foundations of Geographic Information Science.

[18]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Scale in a digital geographic world , 1997 .

[19]  David Altman,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theoretic Approaches for Handling Imprecision in Spatial Analysis , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Barry Smith,et al.  Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries: Towards on Ontology of Spatially Extended Objects , 1997, COSIT.

[21]  J. Pickles.  Ground truth : the social implications of geographic information systems , 1995 .

[22]  Vincent B. Robinson.  Interactive machine acquisition of a fuzzy spatial relation , 1990 .

[23]  P. Burrough,et al.  Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries , 1996 .

[24]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[25]  V. B. Robinson.  Individual and multipersonal fuzzy spatial relations acquired using human-machine interaction , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[26]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[27]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: Cardinal Directions as an Example , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[28]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[29]  David M. Mark,et al.  Toward a Theoretical Framework for Geographic Entity Types , 1993, COSIT.

[30]  Sytze de Bruin,et al.  Querying probabilistic land cover data using fuzzy set theory , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[31]  M. Violet Gray,et al.  Classification as an Impediment to Reliable and Valid Use of Spatial Information: A Disaggregate Approach , 1997, COSIT.

[32]  Lynn A. Streeter,et al.  How to Tell People Where to Go: Comparing Navigational Aids , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..