Tribology of Artificial Joints

More than half a million hip, knee, shoulder, elbow, wrist, finger, and ankle joint prostheses made from engineered materials are implanted world-wide every year to replace diseased natural joints. The breakthrough in artificial joint replacement was achieved with the introduction of approved materials, such as CoCrMo cast alloys with suitable biocompatibility and resistance and with optimized implantation technique using aseptic surgery. Nowadays joint replacement operations are standard, with long-term success rates of more than 10 years [3, 4]. Materials which can be used as biomaterials in endoprosthetics are subjected to complex conditions. For this reason, so-called modular prosthesis systems, which partly resolve the conflicting requirements for components with fixation and tribological requirements, have found wide use in recent years. Using the knowledge from more than 20 years ago, that it is primarily polymer wear particles which significantly affect the long-term results of cemented and cementless prostheses due to osteolysis and subsequent loosening, there is now increased interest in the tribology and material optimization of articulating components of implants [1, 23]. This contribution provides an overview of the tribological validation of new material combinations and designs, together with a brief report on experience.

[1]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  The effect of transfer film and surface roughness on the wear of lubricated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene , 1993 .

[2]  G K McKee,et al.  Total hip replacement--past, present and future. , 1982, Biomaterials.

[3]  M. Semlitsch,et al.  Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  H. Willert,et al.  Comparison of alumina-polyethylene and metal-polyethylene in clinical trials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  R M Streicher,et al.  [UHMW-polyethylene as the substance for articulating components of joint prostheses]. , 1993, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[6]  I A Trail,et al.  Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  N. Rydell Forces acting on the femoral head-prosthesis. A study on strain gauge supplied prostheses in living persons. , 1966, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  M A Freeman,et al.  Tibial high-density polyethylene wear in conforming tibiofemoral prostheses. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  R. Schön,et al.  Untersuchung des tribologischen Verhaltens von Metal/Metall-Kombinationen für künstliche Hüftgelenke , 1990 .

[10]  W. Plitz,et al.  Untersuchungen zum Verschleißmechanismus bei revidierten Hüftendoprothesen mit Gleitflächen aus Al2O3-Keramik , 1980 .

[11]  J. Schurz Biorheologie: Probleme und Ergebnisse in der Medizin , 1983 .

[12]  P. Sioshansi,et al.  Wear improvement of surgical titanium alloys by ion implantation , 1985 .