An analysis of multi-stakeholder interactions in the sugar industry using a social complexity framework

This study examines social complexity in the sugar industry. The sugar industry is complex, characterized by multiple stakeholders each with their own objectives. This study focuses on the interrelationships between the stakeholders by analyzing social complexity. The qualitative research approach was employed. Twenty-three in-depth, unstructured interviews were conducted with various stakeholders to collect data on the challenges that exist. The diverse goals of the stakeholders were found to be characteristic of a purposeful system, as is the case with social systems, but were identified as a potential source of conflict. Although the mill is a corporate shareholder entity, local interactions were found to be important in shaping the future. Critical factors, such as haulier inefficiencies, cane supply and cane quality, were found to have significant implications for the sustainability of the mill area.

[1]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[2]  J. Conklin.  Wicked problems and social complexity , 2003 .

[3]  J. Austin.  From Organization to Organization: On Creating Value , 2010 .

[4]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Complexity Theory and Public Management , 2008 .

[5]  Svetlana. Cicmil,et al.  Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms , 2005 .

[6]  M. Uhl‐Bien,et al.  Leadership in complex organizations , 2001 .

[7]  Isaac Olusegun Osunmakinde,et al.  Temporality in Link Prediction: Understanding Social Complexity , 2009 .

[8]  E. Klijn.  Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What's New? , 2008 .

[9]  Isaac Olusegun Osunmakinde,et al.  Temporality in link prediction , 2009 .

[10]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  R. Ackoff,et al.  Mechanisms, organisms and social systems , 1984 .

[12]  P. Cilliers.  What Can We Learn From a Theory of Complexity , 2000 .

[13]  C. Gershenson,et al.  Philosophy and Complexity , 2007 .

[14]  Ralph Stacey.  Complexity and Organizational Reality: Uncertainty and the Need to Rethink Management after the Collapse of Investment Capitalism , 2009 .

[15]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Organizational responses to complexity: the effect on organizational performance , 2000 .

[16]  Jason Brownlee,et al.  Complex adaptive systems , 2007 .

[17]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[18]  Modeling of Social Organizations: Necessity and Possibility , 2002 .

[19]  Ana Duek,et al.  Reinterpreting Social Processes: How System Theory Can Help To Understand Organizations And The Example Of Indonesia's Decentralization , 2010 .

[20]  David L. Levy,et al.  Applications and Limitations of Complexity Theory in Organization Theory and Strategy , 2000 .

[21]  Clarissa Fourie,et al.  WICKED PROBLEMS, SOFT SYSTEMS AND CADASTRAL SYSTEMS IN PERIODS OF UNCERTAINTY: SOUTH AFRICAN EXPERIENCE , 2002 .

[22]  A. Wynne.  The South African sugar industry in the 2010s: a look into the future using scenario planning. , 2009 .

[23]  Jan Bogg,et al.  Complexity, Science and Society , 2007 .